Robust Target Identification Using a Generalized Likelihood Ratio Test

  • Jon E. Mooney
  • Zhi Ding
  • Lloyd Riggs


The concept of deciding among a set of alternatives (or hypotheses) based upon the observation of a set of random variables has been a topic studied by statisticians for many years. This concept, known as hypothesis testing, provides a mathematically solid foundation to perform target identification. Target identification with known signatures can be easily formulated using Bayes hypothesis testing. However, a significant challenge lies in the need to accurately discriminate among known targets with only partial knowledge of target signatures. The lack of complete target signature knowledge results from the unknown orientation of the target and the dependency of the target signature on the target’s orientation. For practical purposes, it is important to derive efficient and reliable schemes to accurately identify the target without a priori knowledge concerning the target’s orientation.


Energy Ratio Scattered Field Correct Target Generalize Likelihood Ratio Test Aspect Angle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    E.J. Rothwell and D.P. Nyquist, “Radar target discrimination using the extinction-pulse technique,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagation, 33: 929–936 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    E.J. Rothwell, K.M Chen and D.P. Nyquist, “Frequency domain E-pulse synthesis and target discrimination,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagation, 35: 426–434 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C.E. Baum, The Singularity Expansion Method, in: Transient Electromagnetic Fields Springer-Verlag (1976).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C.E. Baum, “Representation of surface current density and far scattering in EEM and SEM with entire functions,” Interaction Note 486, Phillips Laboratory, Kirtland AFB (1992).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Richards, “SEM representation of the early and late time fields scattered from wire targets,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagation, 42 (1995).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H.L. Van Trees, Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory Part I. John Wiley & Sons (1967).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    C.E. Baum, E.J. Rothwell, K.M. Chen, and D.P. Nyquist, “The singularity expansion method and its application to target identification,” IEEE Proceedings, 79: 1481–1492 (1991).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jon E. Mooney
    • 1
  • Zhi Ding
    • 1
  • Lloyd Riggs
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringAuburn UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations