Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Applied Optimization ((APOP,volume 49))

  • 1015 Accesses

Abstract

The mathematical models described in the previous chapters are based on the assumptions of intra-period stationariety. This is equivalent to assuming, as stated in Chapter 1, that all significant variables are constant, at least on average, over successive sub-intervals of a reference period long enough to allow the system to reach stationariety condition. This assumption, although acceptable for many applications, does not allow for the satisfactory simulation of some transportation systems such as heavily congested urban road networks or low frequency scheduled services. In the first case, some important phenomena cannot be reproduced by traditional intra-period static models, including demand peaks, temporary capacity variations, temporary over-saturation of supply elements, and formation and dispersion of queues. In the second case, low-frequency services (e.g. two flights per day) may call into question the assumption of intra-period uniform supply and mixed preventive-adaptive users’ choice behavior introduced in the previous chapters. To simulate these aspects, different intra-periodal or within-day dynamic models have recently been developed; these models are usually referred to in the literature as (within-day) Dynamic Traffic Assignment (DTA) models, implying that dynamic assignment models require within-day dynamic demand and supply models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference Notes

  1. Ben Akiva M., M. Cyna, and A. de Palma (1984). Dynamic model of peak period congestion. Transportation Research 18B: 339–355.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Merchant D. K., and Nemhauser G.L. (1978). A model and an algorithm for the dynamic traffic assignment problem. Transportation Science 12: 183–199.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cascetta E., and G.E. Cantarella (1991). A day-to-day and within-day dynamic stochastic assignment model Transportation Research 25A: 277–291

    Google Scholar 

  4. Friesz T.L., J. Luque, R.L. Tobin, and B.W. Wie (1989). Dynamic network traffic assignment considered as continuous time optimal control problem. Operations Research 37: 893–901.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chabini I., and S. Kachani (1999). Analytical dynamic network loading models: analysis of a single link network Forthcoming in Transportation Research.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wu.J. H., Y. Chen, and M. Florian (1995). The continuous dynamic network loading problem: a mathematical formulation and solution method. Transportation Research 32B: 173–187.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Astarita V. (1996). A continuous time link based model for dynamic network loading based on travel time function. Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory. Lyon, France.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Xu Y., J. Wu, M. Florian, P. Marcotte, and D.L. Zhu (1994). New advances in the continuous dynamic network loading problem Forthcoming in Transportation Science.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jayakarishnan R., H. Mahamassani, and T. Hu (1994). An evaluation tool for advanced traffic information and management system in urban networks. Transportation Research 2C: 129–147.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ben-Akiva M., M. Bierlaire, J. Bottom, H. Koutsopoulos, and R. Mishalani (1997). Development of a route guidance generation system for real-time application. Proceedings of the 8th IFAC Symposium on Transportation Systems, Chania, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cantarella G. E., E. Cascetta, V. Adamo, and V. Astarita (1999). A doubly dynamic traffic assignment model for planning applications. Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, Jerusalem, Israel.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yang Q., and H. Koutsopoulos (1996). A microscopic traffic simulator for evaluation of dynamic traffic management systems. Transportation Research 4C: 113–129.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Abkowitz M.D. (1981). An analysis of the commuter departure time decision. Transportation 10: 283–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Small K.A. (1982). The scheduling of commuter Activities: work trips The American Economic Review 72: 467–479.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cascetta E., A. Nuzzolo, and L. Biggiero (1992). Analysis and modeling of commuters departure time and route choices in urban networks. Proceedings of the 2nd International Seminar on Urban Traffic Networks, Capri, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mahamassani H., and Y. H. Liu (1999). Dynamics of commuting decision behaviour under Advanced Traveller Information Systems. Transportation Research 7C: 91–107.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Boyce D.E., B. Ran, and L. J. Le Blanc (1991). Dynamic user-optimal traffic assignment model: a new model and solution technique. Proceedings of the 151 TRISTAN, Montreal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Janson B. N. (1989). Dynamic traffic assignment for urban road network. Transportation Research 25B: 143–161.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vytoulkas P.K. (1990). A dynamic stochastic assignment model for the analysis of general networks Transportation Research 24B: 453–469.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Friesz T. L., D. Bernstein, T.E. Smith, R. L. Tobin, and B.W. Wie (1993). A variational inequality formulation of the dynamic network users equilibrium problem. Operations Research 41: 179–191.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wie B. W., T. L. Friesz, and T. L. Tobin (1990). Dynamic user optimal traffic assignment on congested multi-destination networks. Transportation Research 24B: 431–442.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ran B., and D. E. Boyce (1994). Dynamic urban transportation network models: theory and implications for Intelligent Vehicle-Highway Systems Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Daganzo C. (1983). Stochastic Network equilibrium problem with multiple vehicle types and asiymmetric, indefinite link cost jacobians Transportation Science 17: 282–300.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cantarella G.E. (1997). A General Fixed-Point Approach to Multi-Mode Multi-User Equilibrium Assignment with Elastic Demand Transportation Science 31: 107–128.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cascetta E., and Improta A.A. (1999). Estimation of travel demand using traffic counts and other data sources. Optimization Days 1999 ( Michael Florian’s special session) Montreal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jha M., S. Madanat, and S. Peeta (1998). Perception updating and day-to-day travel choice dynamics in traffic networks with information provision. Transportation Research 6C: 189–212.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cascetta E., A. Nuzzolo, F. Russo, and A. Vitetta (1996). A new route choice logit model overcoming IIA problems: specification and some calibration results for interurban networks. Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory ( Jean-Baptiste Lesort ed. ), Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cascetta E., L. Biggiero, A. Nuzzolo, and F. Russo (1996). A system of within-day dynamic demand and assignment models for scheduled inter-city services Proceedings of the 24th European Transportation Forum, London, Great Britain.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nuzzolo A., U. Crisalli, and F. Gangemi (2000). A behavioural choice model for the evaluation of railway supply and pricing policies. Transportation Research 35A: 211–226.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hickman M.D., and N.H.M. Wilson (1995). Passenger travel time and path choice implications of real-time transit information. Transportation Research 3C: 211–226.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hickman M.D., and D.H. Bernstein (1997). Transit service and path choice models in stochastic and time-dependent networks. Transportation Science 31: 129–146.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nuzzolo A., F. Russo, and U. Crisalli (1999). A doubly dynamic assignment model for congested urban transit networks. Proceedings of 27th European Transportation Forum, Cambridge, England, Seminar F: 185–196.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cascetta, E. (2001). Intra-Period (Within-Day) Dynamic Models. In: Transportation Systems Engineering: Theory and Methods. Applied Optimization, vol 49. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6873-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6873-2_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-6875-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-6873-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics