Discourse Analysis and Structural Supervision

  • Arnd Hofmeister
Chapter

Summary

Structural Supervision is a conceptual framework, which allows us to analyze problems in the working environment without personalizing them by the use of discourse-analytical and subject-scientific instruments. It is an attempt to combine supervision with an emancipatory impulse. In this paper I sketch the basic assumptions and the analytical framework with its theoretical implications. Following from there I describe the different steps of a supervision process. Finally I give an example of a supervision process in order to illustrate the advantages and problems of this approach. The example is taken from work with the Sanctuary Movement in Germany.

Keywords

Discursive Practice Moral Discourse Group Conflict Supervision Session Supervision Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bourdieu, P. (1980): Le sens pratique. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
  2. Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L.J.D. (1992): An introduction to reflexive sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Deleuze, G. (1986). Foucault. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
  4. Foucault, M. (1969). L’archéologie du savoir. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.Google Scholar
  5. Giesecke, M. and Rappe, C. (1982). Setting und Ablaufstruktuiren in Supervisions-und Balintgruppen. Ergebnisse einer kommunikationswissenschaftlichen Untersuchung. In D. Flader et. al. (Eds) Psychoanalyse als Gesräch, Interaktionsanalytische Untersuchungen fiber Therapie und Supervision (pp 208–299 ). Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  6. Hofmeister, A, (1998). Zur Kritik des Bildungsbegriffs aus subjektwissenschaftlicher Perspektive, Diskursanalytische Untersuchungen. Hamburg: Argument-Verlag.Google Scholar
  7. Holzkamp, K. and Markard, M. (1989) Praxis-Portrait. Ein Leitfaden zur Analyse psychologischer Berufstätigkeit. Forum Kritische Psychologie, 23, (5–49).Google Scholar
  8. Holzkamp-Osterkamp, U. (1991). Emotion, cognition and action-potence. In C. Tolman and W. Maiers (Eds) Critical psychology: Contributions to an historical science of the subject (pp. 102–133 ). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Horkheimer, M. and Adorno, T.W. (1969). Dialektik der Aufklärung, Philosophische Fragmente. Frankfurt/Main: Fischer.Google Scholar
  10. Lyotard, J.F. (1983). Le Différend. Paris: Les Édition de Minuit.Google Scholar
  11. Schütz, F. (1976): Zur Hervorlockung und Analyse thematisch relevanter Geschichten im Rahmen sozilogischer Feldforschung. In: Arbeitsgruppe Bielefelder Soziologen (Eds) Kommunikative Sozialforschung (pp 159–220). München.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arnd Hofmeister
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Western SydneyNepeanAustralia

Personalised recommendations