Reintegrating Sense into Subjectification

  • Martin Hildebrand-Nilshon
  • Johanna Motzkau
  • Dimitris Papadopoulos


Subjectification displays the specific processes forming individual existence in the multiple interrelations between persons and their surroundings. In this sense subjectification corresponds to the idea of an individual as the intersection of the production of meaning and the efficacy of power. In this paper we want to assert that subjectification is more than the mere positioning of the individual between tangents of meaning and practice; it also entails the necessity of creating sense through the subjective reorganization of the conduct of self and of others. The driving force of this movement emerges from the political and social affinities realized by the participating subjects. In our paper we also wish to argue for the historical specificity of such a conception. That is, the notion of an individual both dialogical and self-reflective, although represented by alternative psychologies as the key presupposition for a critical stance in psychology, seems to reflect primarily the dominant postindustrial realities of North Atlantic countries. Finally we offer an insight into some of the central aspects of current socioeconomic reasoning in psychological theories.


Natural Kind Critical Stance Theoretical Thinking Mainstream Psychology Critical Psychology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Altvater, E. and Mahnkopf, B. (1996). Grenzen der Globalisierung: Ökonomie, Ökologie und Politik in der Weltgesellschaft. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.Google Scholar
  2. Burchell, G. (1996). Liberal government and techniques of the self. In A. Barry, T. Osborne, and N. Rose, (Eds), Foucault and political reason. Liberalism, neo-liberalism and rationalities of goverment (pp. 19–36 ). London: University College London Press.Google Scholar
  3. Broughton, J.M. (1987a). An introduction to critical developmental psychology. In J.M. Broughton (Ed.) Critical theories of developmental psychology (pp. 1–30 ). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  4. Broughton, J.M. (Ed.) (1987b). Critical theories of developmental psychology. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  5. Burman, E. (1994). Deconstructing developmental psychology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Danziger, K. (1997a). Naming the mind. How psychology found its language. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Danziger, K. (1997b). Natural kinds, human kinds, and historicity. Vortrag in der 7. Konferenz der International Society for Theoretical Psychology, Berlin, 27. April - 2. Mai 1997.Google Scholar
  8. Deleuze, G. (1969). Die Logik des Sinns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  9. Deleuze, G. (1987). Foucault. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  10. Derrida, J. (1967). Of Grammatology. Übers. v. G. C. Spivak. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  11. Foucault, M. (1982). Technologies of the self. In L.H. Martin, H. Gutman, and P.H. Hutton, (Eds.) Technologies of the self. A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16–49 ). Amherst MA: The Universiy of Massachusetts Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  12. Foucault, M. (1984). The ethic of care for the self as a practice of freedom. In J. Bernauer, and D. Rasmussen, (Eds.), The final Foucault (pp. 1–20 ). Cambridge: MIT Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  13. Haraway, D. (1985). Ein Manifest fill- Cyborgs. Feminismus im Streit mit den Technowissenschaften. In D. Haraway, Die Neuerfindung der Natur. Primaten, Cyborgs und Frauen (pp. 33–72 ). Frankfurt/M.: Campus, 1995.Google Scholar
  14. Hildebrand-Nilshon, M. and Kim, C.-W. (1997). Concerning the compatibility of Vygotsky’s concept of semiotic mediation and the cultural psychological challenge of today. Vortrag in der 7. Konferenz der International Society for Theoretical Psychology, Berlin, 27. April/May.Google Scholar
  15. Hildebrand-Nilshon, M. and Papadopoulos, D. (1998). Short stories about identity. The tension between self-articulation and the regulation of the self. Paper presented at the 4th Congress of the International Society for Cultural Research and Activity Theory, Aarhus, Denmark, June.Google Scholar
  16. Hollway, W. (1984). Gender difference and the production of subjectivity. In J. Henriques et al., Changing the subject. Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity (pp. 227–260 ). London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  17. Holzkamp, K. (1983). Grundlegung der Psychologie. Frankfurt/M.: Campus.Google Scholar
  18. Kim, C.-W. (1997). Baustein für einen kulturpsychologischen Diskurs: Dekonstruktion des unilinearen Entwicklungsgedankens. Berlin: Dissertation (Fachbereich Erziehungswissenschaft und Psychologie der Freien Universität Berlin).Google Scholar
  19. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981). Die Fabrikation von Erkenntnis. Zur Anthropologie der Naturwissenschaft. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 1991.Google Scholar
  20. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
  21. Minh-Ha, Trinh T. (1996). Über zulässige Grenzen: Die Politik der Identität und Differenz. In B. Fuchs, and G. Habinger, (Eds). Rassismen und Feminismen. Differenzen, Machtverhältniss, und Solidarität zwischen Frauen. (p. 151 ). Wien: Promedia.Google Scholar
  22. Morss, J. R. (1996). Growing critical. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Papadopoulos, D. (1999). Lew S. Wygotski — Werk und Wirkung. Frankfurt/M.: Campus.Google Scholar
  24. Parker, I. (1992). Discourse dynamics. Critical analysis for social and individual psychology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Rose, N. (1985). The psychological complex: Psychology, politics, and society in England, 1869–1939. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  26. Rose, N. (1996). Identity, genealogy, history. In S. Hall and P. du Gay (Eds) Questions of cultural identity (pp. 128–150 ). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Staeuble, I. (1991). Könnte Psychologie auch anders aussehen? Zur historischen Rekonstruktion von Alternativen. In H.E. Lack and R. Miller (Hg.), Theorien und Methoden psychologiegeschichtlicher Forschung (pp. 33–42 ). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  28. Tolman, C. W. and Maiers,W. (Eds) (1991). Critical psychology. Contributions to an historical science of the subject. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Vygotsky, L. S. (1934). Thinking and speech. In L.S. Vygotsky, The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky. Bd. I: Problems of general psychology (pp. 39–285). R.W. Rieber, and A.C. Carton (Eds.). New York: Plenum, 1987.Google Scholar
  30. Walkerdine, V. (1988). The mastery of reason. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophische Untersuchungen. In L. Wittgenstein, Werkausgabe, Bd. 1 (pp. 225–580 ). Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 1993.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Hildebrand-Nilshon
    • 1
  • Johanna Motzkau
    • 1
  • Dimitris Papadopoulos
    • 1
  1. 1.Free University of BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations