Summary
The call for interdisciplinarity within psychology appears to be an ambivalent one. The integration of investigative practices and knowledge from other academic realms into psychology has recurrently been tantamount to sacrificing an independent understanding of the psychological. It is not only with respect to the (wishful) emulation of physics or to the advance of computer-scientific metaphors, with the cognitive turn, that psychology’s history can be written as the history of an “imitative science”. The same holds true for alternative designs of psychology as an interpretative investigation in strict analogy to the hermeneutics of textual material. Interdisciplinarity raises issues of the possible unity of the sciences and of how this relates to reality. The scientific program of materialist dialectics, while facing up to the philosophical problem of realism, opens a new perspective for an explanatory understanding of the totality of nature and society that does not concern itself with disciplinary entrenchments. In this vein, Critical Psychology builds its own specifically psychological conceptual and methodological system within a truly “transdisciplinary” framework.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Brockmeier, J. (1997). Narrative realities, human possibilities. In Brockmeier, J. (Ed.) Narrative realities:Perspectives on the self, 4–17. Vienna: Internationales Forschungszentrum Kulturw i ssenschaften.
Brockmeier, J. and Harré, R. (1997). Narrative: Problems and promises of an alternative paradigm. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 30 (4), 263–283.
Leontiev, A.N. (1978). Activity, consciousness & personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
Maiers, W. (1988). Has psychology exaggerated its ‘natural scientific character’? Remarks concerning an empirical topic and a methodological desideratum of ‘theoretical psychology’. In W. J. Baker, L. P. Mos, H. van Rappard & H.J. Stam (Eds) Recent trends in theoretical psychology (pp. 133–143 ). New York/Heidelberg/Berlin: Springer.
Maiers, W. (1999). Critical Psychology — an unfinished modern project. In W. Maiers, B. Bayer, B. D. Esgalhado, R. Jorna & E. Schraube (Eds) Challenges to theoretical psychology (pp. 457–466 ). North York: Captus Press.
Ratner, C. (1988). Psychology’s relation to biology: qualitatively distinct levels. In W. J. Baker, L. P. Mos, H. van Rappard & H.J. Stain (Eds) Recent trends in theoretical psychology (pp. 95–105 ). New York/Heidelberg/Berlin: Springer.
Rose, H. (1998). Evolutionary psychology: Social Darwinism and the standard social science model. Unpublished MS.
Tooby, J. and Cosmides, L. (1992). Psychological foundations of culture. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides & J. Tooby (Eds) The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 19–136 ). New York: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maiers, W. (2001). Psychological Theorising in Transdisciplinary Perspective. In: Morss, J.R., Stephenson, N., van Rappard, H. (eds) Theoretical Issues in Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6817-6_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6817-6_24
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-4890-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-6817-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive