Summary
Feminist critiques of rationalism as a masculinist cultural construction, and of logic as a component of this regime of truth, extend to the traditional psychological research on inference as well. This discussion explores issues entailed in reconfiguring the theoretical and empirical study of reasoning on new ground informed by critique, a task that I argue is necessary if feminist theories of logic are to avoid producing new canons through rationalist theorizing and if the study of reasoning is to be rescued from its domination by a rationalist tradition. An illustrative qualitative study of reasoning processes with a design and interpretive framework informed by the above critiques and by feminist perspective on epistemology, is used as a vehicle for exposing the meta-theoretical, theoretical and methodological tensions entailed by this transdisciplinary reconstructive project, the ramifications of critique for method and the theory-data problematic.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alcoff, L., & Potter, E. (1993). Feminist epistemologies. New York: Routledge.
Bordo, S. (1987). The flight to objectivity: Essays on Cartesianism and culture. Albany NY: State University of New York Press.
Collins, P.H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.
Falmagne, R. Joffe (2000b). Deconstructing cognitive psychology: A critical opening. Review of E. A. Wilson, Neural geographies: Feminism and the microstructure of cognition. Theory and Psychology, 10, 277–282.
Falmagne, R. Joffe (1997). Toward a feminist theory of inference: Exploration of a cross-disciplinary methodology. Paper presented at the enGendering Rationalities Conference, University of Oregon.
Falmagne, R. Joffe (2000a). Positionality and thought: On the gendered foundation of thought, culture and development. In P. H. Miller & E. K. Scholnick (Eds), Toward a feminist developmental psychology (pp. 191–213 ). New York: Routledge.
Falmagne, R. Joffe (in press). Toward a feminist theory of inference: The case for a transdisciplinary methodology. In M. Hass & R. Joffe Falmagne (Eds), Feminist perspectives on logic. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Falmagne, R. Joffe, & Gonsalves, J. (1995). Deductive inference. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 525–559.
Flax, J. (1993). Disputed subjects: Essays on psychoanalysis, subjects, politics and philosophy. New York: Routledge.
Foucault, M. (1980) Power/knowledge. New York: Pantheon.
Harding, S. (1993). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: “What is strong objectivity?” In L. Alcoff & E. Potter (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 49–82 ). New York: Routledge.
Hartsock, N. (1983). The feminist standpoint: Developing the grounds for a specifically feminist historical materialism. In S. Harding & M. Hintikka (Eds), Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics methodology and philosophy of science (pp. 283–310 ). Dordrecht: Reidel.
Hass, M., & Falmagne, R. Joffe (Eds) (in press). Feminist perspectives on logic. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Henriques, J., Hollway, W., Urwin, C., Venn, C., & Walkerdine, V. (1984). Changing the subject: Social regulation and subjectivity. London: Methuen.
hooks, b. (1990). Choosing the margin as a space of radical openness. In b. hooks (Ed.), Yearning: Race, gender, and cultural politics (pp. 145–154 ). Boston: South End Press.
Lloyd, G. (1984). The man of reason: “Male” and “female” in western philosophy. London: Methuen.
Lloyd, G. (1993). Maleness, metaphor, and the “crisis” of reason. In L. M. Antony & C. Witt (Eds), A mind of one’s own: Feminist essays on reason and objectivity (pp. 69–84 ). Boulder CO: Westview Press.
Mohanty, C. (1991). Introduction: Cartographies of struggle. In C. Mohanty, A. Russo, & L. Torres (Eds.) Third world women and the politics offeminism (pp. 1–50). Indiana University Press.
Nelson, L. H. (1990). Who knows? From Quine to a feminist empiricism. Temple University Press. Nelson, L. H. (in press). Logic as an empirical enterprise. In M. Hass & R. Joffe Falmagne (Eds) Feminist perspectives on logic. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Nye, A. (1990). Words of power. New York: Routledge.
Olkowski, D. (in press). Words of power and the logic of sense. In M. Hass & R. Joffe Falmagne (Eds) Feminist perspectives on logic. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Plumwood, V. (1993/in press). The politics of reason: Towards a feminist logic. Australasian Journal of Philosophy,71, 436–462. Reprinted in M. Hass & R. Joffe Falmagne (Eds) Feminist perspectives on logic. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Smith, D. (1990). Texts, facts and femininity. London: Routledge.
Walkerdine, V. (1988). The mastery of reason: Cognitive development and the production of rationality. London: Routledge.
Wilson, E. (1998). Neural geographies: Feminism and the microstructure of cognition. London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Falmagne, R.J. (2001). The Dialectic of Critique, Theory and Method in Developing Feminist Research on Inference. In: Morss, J.R., Stephenson, N., van Rappard, H. (eds) Theoretical Issues in Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6817-6_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6817-6_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-4890-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-6817-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive