Skip to main content

Cognitive Interpretation of Visual Signals

  • Chapter

Abstract

How we see, and how we know what we see, are conundrums that have perplexed scientists for decades and intrigued philosophers for centuries. In pre-Socratic times, philosophers attempted to separate interactions with the external world into those that involve the human senses and those that do not involve the senses directly. The theory of Empedocles, typical of the reasoning employed by several early philosophers, suggested that the senses are affected by tiny, particle-like effluences emitted by objects. As the effluences strike the body, they lodge in one set of pores or another depending on their exact size and configuration. Each set of pores gives rise to a particular sensation experienced by the observer. For a stone to be seen as a gray, round object, its effluences would have to be captured by the pores that characterize gray, round objects. These pores are located in the eyes, because the object is seen. Objects that are heard emit effluences that are captured by the ears, and effluences that are captured by the nose give rise to the sensation of smell.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnes J. Perception: Early Greek theories. In: Gregory R.L., ed. Oxford Companion to the Mind. New York: Oxford University Press; 1987: 603–604.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barnes J. Aristotle. In: Gregory R.L., ed.Oxford Companion to the Mind. New York: Oxford University Press; 1987: 38–40.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Scruton R. Spinoza. New York: Oxford University Press; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Locke J. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding ( 1690 ). Nidditch P.H., ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Newton I. Opticks (4th ed., 1704 ). London: Smith and Walford.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Walker R.C.S. Leibniz’s philosophy of mind. In: Gregory R.L., ed. Oxford Companion to the Mind. New York: Oxford University Press; 1987: 433–434.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Berkeley G. An Essay Towards a New Theory of Vision ( 1709 ). New York: C.P. Dutton; 1910.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kant I. Critique of Pure Reason (1929, trans. Kemp Smith N.). London.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Price H. Hume’s Theory of the External World. Oxford: Clarendon; 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  10. von Helmoltz H. Handbook de Physiologischen Optik (Part I, 1856; Part II, 1860; Part III, 1866. Leipzig: Voss. 1925, trans. Southall G. ). New York: Dover; 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gregory R.L. Concepts and Mechanisms of Perception. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons; 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gibson J.J. The Perception of the Visual World. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kohler W. Gestalt Psychology ( 1929 ). New York: Liveright; 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Marr D. Vision. New York: Freeman; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gregory R.L. The Intelligent Eye. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson; 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rock I. Perception. New York: Scientific American Library; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Marroquin J.L. Human Visual Perception of Structure (M.Sc. thesis; Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science). Boston: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Julesz B. Vision: The early warning system. In: Gregory R.L., ed. Oxford Companion to the Mind. New York: Oxford University Press; 1987: 346.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Julesz B. Textons, the elements of texture perception and their interactions.Nature 1981; 290: 91–97.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Thurston J.B., Carraher R.G. Optical Illusions and the Visual Arts. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gregory R.L. Illusions. In: Gregory R.L., ed. Oxford Companion to the Mind. New York: Oxford University Press; 1987: 337–343.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hendee W.R. The perception of visual information. Radiographics 1987; 7 (6): 1213–1219.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Escher M.C. The Graphic Work of MC Escher ( 2nd ed. ). New York: Hawthorne Books; 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Penrose R. Escher and the visual representation of mathematical ideas. In: Coxeter H.S.M., Emner M., Penrose R., Teubre M.L., eds. M.C. Escher: Art and Science ( 2nd ed. ). New York: North Holland; 1987: 143–157.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Parks T.E. Illusory figures. In: Gregory R.L., ed. Oxford Companion to the Mind. New York: Oxford University Press; 1987: 344–347.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Descartes R. Meteores. Paris; 1638.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hooke R. Micrographia (reprint of 1665 ed.). New York: Dover; 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Young T. On the theory of light and colors. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 1802; 92.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hendee, W.R. (1993). Cognitive Interpretation of Visual Signals. In: Hendee, W.R., Wells, P.N.T. (eds) The Perception of Visual Information. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6769-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6769-8_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-6771-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-6769-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics