Combination Therapy for Hypertension and Renal Disease in Diabetes

  • Imelda P. Villarosa
  • George L. Bakris
Chapter

Abstract

More than 75% of individuals with diabetes, microalbuminuria and hypertension require two or more antihypertensive medications to attain the currently recommended level of arterial pressure control i.e., substantially less than 130/85 mmHg [1–3]. To achieve this Mood pressure goal, it is common to add a medication whose antihypertensive action potentiates the initially selected drug [4,5]. To further improve compliance and reduce drug side effect profiles, fixed-dose combinations of antihypertensive drugs with complementary modes of action have been recently developed [5]. These medications combine a lower dose of two different antihypertensive drugs that, in a fixed dose combination, reduce arterial pressure to a greater extent compared to either alone. The history of various fixed-dose antihypertensive drug combinations is shown in Table 52–1. The evolution of fixed-dose combination antihypertensive therapy is beyond the scope of this chapter. The reader, however, is referred to a recent review on the topic [5]. This chapter will focus on the available evidence from both animal models of hypertension and renal disease as well as clinical studies that examine the efficacy of different classes of antihypertensive medications, either alone or combined, to either halt or prevent development of renal disease. The discussion will primarily, but not exclusively, focus on angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and calcium channel blockers (CCBs).

Keywords

Diabetic Nephropathy Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor Calcium Channel Blockade Antiproteinuric Effect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on Hypertension and Renal Disease. 1995 Update of the working group reports on chronic renal failure and renovascular hypertension. Arch Intem Med 1996; 156:1938–1947.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bakris GL. Pathogenesis of hypertension in diabetes. Diabetes Reviews 1995; 3(3):460–476Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    The Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure(JNC VI). Arch Intern Med, 1997; 157:2413–2446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Waeber B, Brurmer HR. Main objectives and new aspects of combination treatment of hypertension. J Hypertens 1995; 13 (Suppl):S15– S19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Epstein M and Bakris GL. Newer approaches to antihypertensive therapy using fixed dose combination therapy: Future perspectives. Arch Intern Med. 1996; 156:1969–1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Griffin KA, Picken MM and Bidani AK. Deleterious effects of calcium channel blockade on pressure transmission and glomerular injury in rat remnant kidneys. J Clin. Invest 1995; 96: 793–800.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kilaru P and Bakris GL: ACE inhibition or calcium-channel blockade: Renal implications of combination therapy versus a single agent J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1996; 28(Suppl 4):S34– S44.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bakris GL, Walsh MF, Sowers JR. Endothelium,mesangium interactions:Role of insulin-like growth factors . IN: Endocrinology of the Vasculature (Sowers JR, ed). Humana Press Inc. New Jersey, 1996, pp.341–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Smith AC, Toto R, Bakris GL. Differential effects of calcium channel blockers on size selectivity of proteinuria in diabetic glomerulopathy. Kidney Int In press.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bakris GL Microalbuminuria: Prognostic Implications. Curr Opin in Nephrol and Hypertens 1996; 5(3):219–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Drumond MC, Kristal B, Myers BD, Deen WM Structural basis for reduced glomerular filtration capacity in nephrotic humans. J Clin Invest 1994; 94(3):1187–1195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bakris GL, Mehler P, and Schrier R. Hypertension and Diabetes. IN Schrier RW and Gottschalk CW (eds.) Diseases of the Kidney 6th ed., Little Brown and Company, 1996, Chapter 54, pp. 1281–1328Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Steffes MW, Osterby R, Chavers B, and Mauer SM. Mesangial expansion as a central mechanism for loss of kidney function in diabetic patients. Diabetes 1989; 38:1077–1081.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Anderson S, Rennke HG, Brenner BM Nifedipine versus fosinopril in uninephrectomized diabetic rats. Kidney Int 1992; 41:891–897.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ravid M, Lang R, Rachmani R, Lishner M. Long-term renoprotective effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156:286–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Parving H, Hommel E, Nielsen M, Giese J: Effect of Captopril on blood pressure and kidney function in normotensive insulin dependent diabetics with nephropathy. Br Med J 1989; 299:533–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bakris GL, Slataper R, Vicknair N, Sadler R: ACE inhibitor mediated reductions in renal size and microalbuminuria in normotensive, diabetic subjects. J Diab Compl 1994; 8:2–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Viberti G; Mogensen CE; Groop LC; Pauls JF. Effect of Captopril on progression to clinical proteinuria in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria. European Microalbuminuria Captopril Study Group JAMA 1994; 271(4):275–9.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sakamoto N: Effects of long-term enalapril treatment on persistent microalbuminuria in well-controlled hypertensive and normotensive NIDDM patients. Diabetes Care 1994; 17:420–424PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bakris GL, Copley JB, Vicknair N, Sadler R, Leurgans S. Calcium channel blockers versus other antihypertensive therapies on progression of NIDDM associated nephropathy: Results of a six year study. Kidney Int. 1996; 50:1641–1650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lebovitz HE, Wiegmarm TB, Cnaan A: Renal protective effects of enalapril in hypertensive NIDDM: role of baseline albuminuria. Kidney Int Suppl 1994; 45:S150– S155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Bain RP, Rohde RD for the Collaborative Study Group. The effect of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition on diabetic nephropathy. N Engl J Med 1993; 329:1456–1462.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Guasch A, Parham M, Zayas CF, Campbell O, Nzerue C, Macon E. Contrasting effects of calcium channel blockade versus converting enzyme inhibition on proteinuria in African Americans with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus and nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 1997; 8: 793–798.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Agardh CD, Garcia-Puig J, Charbonnel B, Angelkort B, Barnett AH. Greater reduction of urinary albumin excretion in hypertensive Type II diabetic patients with incipient nephropathy by lisinopril than by nifedipine. J Human Hypertens 1996; 10:185–192.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Maschio G, Alberti D, Janin G, Locatelli F, Mann JEF, Motolese M, Ponticelli C, Ritz E, Zucchelli P, and the Angiotensm-Converting-Enzyme Inhibition in Progressive Renal Insufficiency Study Group. Effect of the angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor benazepril on the progression of chronic renal insufficiency. N Engl J Med 1996; 334:939–945PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gaber L, Walton C, Brown S, Bakris, GL: Effects of different antihypertensive treatments on morphologic progression of diabetic nephropathy in uninephrectomized dogs. Kidney Int 1994; 46:161–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Munter K, Hergenroder S, Jochims K, Kirchengast M. Individual and combined effects of verapamil or trandolapril on glomerular morphology and function in the stroke prone rat. J Am Soc Nephrol 1996; 7:681–686PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Brown SA, Walton CL, Crawford P & Bakris GL. Long-term effects of different anti-hypertensive regimens on renal hemodynamics and proteinuria. Kidney Int 1993,43:1210–1218.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Picken M, Griffin K, Bakris GL and Bidani A. Comparative effects of four different calcium antagonists on progression of renal disease in a remnant kidney model. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996; 7:1586[abstract]Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Griffin K, Picken M, Bakris GL and Bidani A. Calcium antagonists and the remnant kidney model:relative antihypertensive and glomeruloprotective efficacies. Am J Hypertens 1996; 9:38 (abstract)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jyothirmayi GN, Reddi AS: Effect of diltiazem on glomerular heparan sulfate and albuminuria in diabetic rats. Hypertension 1993; 21:765–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Andrawis NS and Abernathy DR. Effect of calcium antagonists on RNA synthesis of NIH 3T3 cells. Am J Med Sci 1993; 306:137–140.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jyothirmayi GN, Alluru I, Reddi AS. Doxazosin prevents proteinuria and glomerular loss of heparan sulfate in diabetic rats. Hypertension 1996,27:1108–1114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dworkin LD, Tolbert E, Recht PA, Hersch JC, Feiner H, Levin RI. Effects of amlodipine on glomerular filtration, growth and injury in experimental hypertension. Hyperten. 1996; 27:245–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Abbott K, Smith AC, Bakris GL. Effects of dihydropyridine calcium antagonists on albuminuria in diabetic subjects. J. Clin Pharmacol. 1996; 36:274–279.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gilbert RE, Jerum G, Allen T, Hammond J, Cooper ME on behalf on Diabetic Nephropathy Study Group. Effect of different antihypertensive agents on normotensive microalbuminuria patients with IDDM and NIDDM J Am Soc Nephrol 1994; 5:377 (abstract).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Campbell D on behalf of the Melbourne Nephropathy Study Group. ACE inhibitors versus calcium channel blockade. Fifth International Symposium on Hypertension associated with Diabetes Mellitus. International Society of Nephrology 1997, pp.32.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zucchelli P, Zuccala A, Borghi M, et al., Long term comparison between Captopril and nifedipine in the progression of renal insufficiency Kidney Int 1992 42:452–458.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Vetussi M, Brocco E, Frigato F, Zolli M, Muollo B, Maioli M, Carraro A, Tonolo G, Fresu P, Cemigoi A, Fioretto P, Nosadini R. Effects of Cilazapril and amlodipine on kidney function in hypertensive NIDDM patients. Diabetes 1996; 45:216–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Locatelli F. AIPRI Trial: Secondary Analysis. Progression of Renal Disease Symposium. International Society of Nephrology Meeting, 1997Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Estado RO, Savage S, Nagel NJ, Schrier RW. Baseline characteristics of participants in the Appropriate Blood Pressure Control in Diabetes Trials. Controlled Clin Trials 1996; 17:242–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gansevoort RT, Sluiter WJ, Hemmeider MH, de Zeeuw D, de Jong PE Antiproteinuric effect of blood pressure lowering agents: a meta-analysis of comparative trials. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1995; 10:1963–1974PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Weidmann P, Scneider M, Bohlen L et al. Therpeutic efficacy of differentantihypertensive drugs in human diabetic nephropa: An updated meta-analysis. Nephrol Dial Transpl 1995; 10(Suppl 9):39–45Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Maki DD, Ma JZ, Louis TA, Kasiske BL: Effect of antihypertensive agents on the kidney. Arch Intern Med 1995; 155:1073–1082.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Bakris GL, Mangrum A, Copley JB, Vicknair N, Sadler R. Calcium channel or beta blockade on progression of diabetic renal disease in African-Americans. Hypertension 1997; 29:744–750PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tarif N and Bakris GL Preservation of renal function: the spectrum of effects by calcium channel blockers. Nephrol Dial Transpl, 1997; 12: 2244–2250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wenzel RO, Helmchen U, Schoeppe W, Schwietzer G. Combination treatment of enalapril with nitrendipine in rats with renovascular hypertension. Hypertension 1994; 23:114–122.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Bakris GL, Griffin KA, Picken MM, and Bidani AK. Combined effects of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and a calcium antagonist on renal injury. J Hypertension 1997; 15: 1181–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Fogari R, Zoppi A, Mugellini A, Lusardi P, Destro M, Corradi L. Effect of benazepril plus amlodipine vs. benazepril alone on urinary albumin excretion in hypertensive patients with type II diabetes and microalbuminuria. Clin Drug Invest 1996:11:50–55.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hess B. Reduced proteinuria after cessation of long acting osmotic release nifedipine GITS in diabetic nephropathy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1997; 12:1772 (letter).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Bakris GL, Weir M, DeQuattro V, Rosendorff C, McMahon G. Renal effects of a long acting ACE inhibitor, trandolapril or nondihydropyridine calcium blocker, verapamil alone or in a fixed dose combination in diabetic nephropathy: a randomized double blind placebo controlled multicenter study. Nephrology, 1997; 3:271 [abstract]Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Holzgreve H. Safety profile of the combination of verapamil and trandolapril. J Hypertens. 1997; 15(suppl 2):S51– S53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Schneider M, Lerch M, Papiri M, Buechel P, Boehlen L, Shaw S, Risen W, Weidmann P. Metabolic neutrality of combined verapamil-trandolapril treatment in contrast to beta-blocker-low-dose chlorthalidone treatment in hypertensive type II diabetes. J Hypertens. 1996; 14:669–677.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Lash JP and Bakris GL. Effects of ACE inhibitors and calcium antagonists alone or combined on progression of diabetic nephropathy. Nephrol. Dial and Transpl. 1995; 10 (Supp 1.9): 56–62Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Lee JJ, Boulanger CM, Kirchengast M, Vanhoutte PM Trandolapril plus verapamil inhibits the coronary vasospasm induced by hypoxia following ischemia-reperfusion injury in dogs. Gen Pharm. 1996; 27(6): 1057–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Nelson RG, Knowler WC, Pettitt DJ, Bennett PH. Kidney diseases in diabetes. In Diabetes In America National Institutes of Health Pub. No.95–1468, 2nd edition, 1995, pp. 349–400Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Simeon G, Bakris G. Socioeconomic impact of diabetic nephropathy: can we improve the outcome? J Hypertens 1997; 15 (Suppl 2):S77– S82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Yusuf S, Lessem J, Jha P, Lonn E. Primary and secondary prevention of myocardial infarction and strokes: an update of randomly allocated, controlled trials. J Hypertens 1993; 11 (Suppl 4):S61– S73.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Furberg CD, Psaty BM and Meyer JV. Dose-related increase in mortality in patients with coronary heart disease. Circulation 1995; 92:1326–1331.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Estacio RO, Jeffers BW, Hiatt WR, Biggerstaff SL, Gifford N, Schrier RW. The effect of nisoldipine as compared with enalapril on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes and hypertension. N Engl J Med. 1998; 338:645–652.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Perna A and Remuzzi G. Abnormal permeability to proteins and glomerular lesions: a meta-analysis of experimental and human studies. Am J Kidney Dis 1996; 27:34–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Imelda P. Villarosa
    • 1
  • George L. Bakris
    • 1
  1. 1.The Rush Hypertension CenterRush Presbyterian/St Luke’s Medical CenterChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations