Squeezing in Fourth-Order Parametric Downconversion

  • Antonio Mecozzi
  • Paolo Tombesi
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSB, volume 190)

Abstract

The systems which generate squeezing of the electromagnetic radiation1,2, considered in the successful experiments performed in the last couple of years, are of the two-photon variety. They concern an optical medium with nonlinear polarization, with second-order3 or third-order4 susceptibility, interacting with an external coherent pump. Due to the low intensity of the pumps used high finesse cavity or optical fibers were employed.

Keywords

Coherent State Anharmonic Oscillator Imaginary Time Nonlinear Polarization Susceptibility Tensor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    D. F. Walls, Nature (London) 306, 141 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Loudon and P. L. Knight, J. Mod. Opt. 34, 709 (1987).MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. Wu, H. J. Kimble, J. L. Hall and H. Wu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2520 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. E. Slusher, L. W. Hollberg, B. Yurke, J. C. Mertz and J. F. Valley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2409 (1985)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. R. M. Shelby, M. D. Levenson S. H. Perlmutter, R. G. DeVoe and D. F. Walls, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 691 (1986)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. M. W. Maeda, P. Kumar and J. H. Shapiro, Opt. Lett. 12, 161 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 5.
    P. Tombesi and H. P. Yuen in Coherence and Quantum Optics Vol. 5, eds. L. Mandel and E. Wolf ( Plenum Press, New York 1984 ).Google Scholar
  8. 6.
    H. P. Yuen, Phys. Rev. A13, 2226 (1986).Google Scholar
  9. 7.
    R. Tanas in Coherence and Quantum Optics Vo1. 5, eds. L. Mandel and E. Wolf ( Plenum Press, New York 1984 ).Google Scholar
  10. 8.
    C. K. Hong and L. Mandel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 323 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 9.
    M. Kozierowski and R. Tanas, Opt. Com. 21, 229 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 10.
    C. Gerry, Phys. Lett. 124A, 237 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 11.
    R. A. Fisher, M. M. Nieto and V. D. Sandberg, Phys. Rev. D29, 1107 (1984).MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 12.
    S. L. Braunstein and R. L. McLachlan, Phys. Rev. A35, 1659 (1987).ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 13.
    G. D’Ariano, M. Ràsetti and M. Vadacchino, Phys. Rev. D32, 1034 (1985); see also the present volume.Google Scholar
  16. 14.
    S. A. Akmanov, A. N. Dubovik, S. M. Saltiel, I. V. Tomov and V. G. Tunkin, JETP Lett. 20, 117 (1975).ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 15.
    J. R. Klauder and B. S. Skagerstam, Coherent States: Application in Physics and Mathematical Physics, ( World Scientific, Singapore 1985 ).Google Scholar
  18. 16.
    R. P. Feynman, Rev. Mod. Phys. 20, 367 (1948).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 17.
    M. Kac, Proc. Second Berkely Symp. Math. Stat. and Prob. 16.Google Scholar
  20. 18.
    C. De Witt-Morette and K. D. Elworthy, Phys. Rep. 77, 121 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 19.
    R. H. Cameron and W. T. Martin, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 51, 73 (1945).MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 20.
    M. Hillery and M. S. Zubairy, Phys. Rev. A26, 451 (1982).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 21.
    E. W. Montrol and M. F. Shlesinger, in Studies in Statistical Mechanics,eds. J. L. Lebowitz and E. W. Montrol (North Holland, Amsterdam 1984) Vol. 11.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio Mecozzi
    • 1
  • Paolo Tombesi
    • 2
  1. 1.Fondazione Ugo BordoniRomaItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di FisicaUniversità di Roma “La Sapienza”RomaItaly

Personalised recommendations