Squeezed and Nonclassical Light pp 185-201 | Cite as
Generation of Number-Phase Squeezed States
Chapter
Abstract
Squeezed states have attracted quite a lot of attention the last few years. In such states the operators between which the quantum noise is redistributed are the quadrature components âl and â2. While squeezed states may lead to substantial improvements of the sensitivity of precision measurements, specifically in interferometry [1], they may not be optimal for information transmission and processing. Another type of non-classical states of the electromagnetic field are number-phase minimum uncertainty states (NUS).
Keywords
Photon Number Parametric Amplifier Cavity Decay Rate Pump Phase Squeeze State
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- [1]D. F. Walls, Nature 306, 141 (1983)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [2]R. Jackiw, J. Math. Phys. 9, 339 (1968)ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [3]H. P. Yuen, Phys. Rev. A13, 2226 (1976)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [4]Y. Yamamoto and H. A. Haus, Rev. Mod. Phys. 56, (1986)Google Scholar
- [5]K. Igeta and Y. Yamamoto, to be published.Google Scholar
- [6]Y. Yamamoto, S. Machida and O. Nilsson, Phys. Rev. A34, 4025 (1986)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [7]P. R. Tapster, J. G. Rarity and J. S. Satchell, Europhys. Lett. 4, 293 (1987)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [8]M. C. Teich and B.E.A. Saleh, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B2, 275 (1985)ADSGoogle Scholar
- [9]M. C. Teich, F. Capasso and B.E.A. Saleh, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B4, 1663 (1987)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [10]Y. Yamamoto and N. Imoto, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-22, 2032 (1986)Google Scholar
- [11]Y. Yamamoto, S. Machida and Y. Itaya, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1000 (1987)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [12]Y. Yamamoto and S. Machida, submitted for publication.Google Scholar
- [13]S. Machida and Y. Yamamoto, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-22, 617 (1986)Google Scholar
- [14]A. Larsson, M. Mittelstein, A. Arakawa and A. Yariv, Electron. Lett. 22, 79 (1986)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [15]W. H. Louisell, A. Yariv and A. E. Siegman, Phys. Rev. 124, 1646 (1961)ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [16]G. Björk and Y. Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. A37, 125 (1988)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [17]A. Heidmann, R. J. Horowicz, S. Reynaud, E. Giacobino, C. Fabre and G. Camy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2555 (1987)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [18]S. Reynaud, C. Fabre and E. Giacobino, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B4, 1520 (1987)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [19]E. Jakeman and J. G. Walker, Opt. Commun. 55, 219 (1985)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [20]D. Stoler and B. Yurke, Phys. Rev. A34, 3143 (1986)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [21]G. Björk and Y Yamamoto, accepted for publication in Phys. Rev. A. Google Scholar
- [22]G. Björk and Y. Yamamoto, submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1989