Social capital and labor politics in Japan: Cooperation or cooptation?

  • Jeffrey P. Broadbent


Social capital, defined as relations of reciprocal support, is thought to enhance a group’s capacity to attain a common good. In Japan, social capital ties permeate much of political society. One would expect that social capital would facilitate parties to arrive at equitable labor policies and reduce overt political conflict in Japan. Has this cooperation occurred, or has labor been coopted? My study addresses this question through the analysis of networks among organizations active in labor-related policy decisions. I focus on Japan with some reference to the United States. The analysis shows that, indeed, networks of social capital weave together government, business, and labor very tightly in Japan (but only labor in the U.S.). The more tightly social capital ties labor to the state, the less it differs from the state’s preferred policy. Intense differences of material interests, though, as indicated by the case of a health care policy decision, weaken this integrative capacity of social capital. The Labor Ministry tries to use social capital to build consensus between labor and business, but diverging interests erode such consensus. These findings indicate that dense networks of social capital, while facilitating consensus, do not erase opposed material interests.


Social Capital Liberal Democratic Party Labor Sector Socialist Party Democratic Socialist Party 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Borgatti, S. P., M. G. Everett and L. C. Freeman (1999). UCINET V for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Natick: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
  2. Broadbent, J. (1998). Environmental Politics in Japan: Networks of Power and Protest. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Broadbent, J. and Y. Ishio (1998).‘The “influence broker” state: Social networks and political organization in Japan,’ in M. Fruin, ed., Networks and Markets: Pacific Rim Investigations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell, J. (1992). How Policies Change: The Japanese Government and the Aging Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Clemens, E. (1999). ‘Politics and institutionalism: Explaining durability and change,’Annual Review of Sociology 25: 441–466.Google Scholar
  7. Coleman, J. (1988). ‘Social capital in the creation of human capital,’ American Journal of Sociology 94 (supplement): S95–5120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eccleston, B. (1989). State and Society in Post-War Japan. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  9. Evans, P. (1995). Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Fernandez, R. and R. Gould (1994). ‘A dilemma of state power: Brokerage and influence in the national health policy domain,’American Journal of Sociology 99 (6): 1455–1491.Google Scholar
  11. Friedland, R. and R. Alford (1991). ‘Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions,’ in W. Powell and P. DiMaggio, eds., The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago, pp. 232–263.Google Scholar
  12. Fukui, H. (1992). ‘The Japanese state and economic development: A profile of a nationalist-paternalist capitalist state,’ in R. Appelbaum and J. Henderson, eds., States and Development in the Asian Pacific Rim. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, pp. 199–225.Google Scholar
  13. Garon, S. (1987). The State and Labor in Modern Japan. Berkeley: University of California Press. Granovetter, M. (1985). ‘Economic action, social structure, and embeddedness,’ American Journal of Sociology 91 (3): 481–510.Google Scholar
  14. Hamaguchi, E. (1985). ‘A contextual model of the Japanese: Toward a methodological innovation in Japanese studies,’ Journal of Japanese Studies 11 (2): 289–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Inoguchi, T. (1983). Gendai Nihon Seiji Keizai No Kozu (The Structure of Contemporary Japanese Political-Economy). Tokyo: Toyo Keizai Shuppansha.Google Scholar
  16. Knoke, D. (1990). Political Networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Knoke, D., F. Pappi, J. Broadbent and Y. Tsujinaka (1996). Comparing Policy Networks: Labor Politics in the U.S., Germany and Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kotkin, J. (1999). ‘New home for a lost generation of innovators,’ New York Times Sunday, March 28, 6 (Business section).Google Scholar
  19. Kume, I. (1998). Disparaged Success: Labour Politics in Postwar Japan. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Marsden, P. (1981). ‘Introducing influence processes in a system of collective decisions,’ American Journal of Sociology 86 (6): 1203–1235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Marsden, P. (1982). ‘Brokerage behavior in restricted exchange networks,’ in P. Marsden and N. Lin, eds., Social Structure and Network Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Marsden, P. (1983). ‘Restricted access in networks and models of power,’ American Journal of Sociology 88 (4): 686–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McMillan, C. (1985). The Japanese Industrial System. New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  24. Murakami, Y. (1984). ‘Ie society as a pattern of civilization,’ Journal of Japanese Studies 10 (2): 279363.Google Scholar
  25. Murakami, Y. and T. Rohlen (1992). ‘Social-exchange aspects of the japanese political economy: Culture, efficiency, and change,’ in S. Kumon and H. Rosovsky, eds., The Political Economy of Japan: Volume 3: Cultural and Social Dynamics. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 63105.Google Scholar
  26. Muramatsu, M. and E. Krauss (1987). ‘The conservative policy line and the development of patterned pluralism model,’ in K. Yamamura and Y. Yasuba, eds., The Political Economy of Japan, Vol. 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 516–554.Google Scholar
  27. Nakane, C. (1970). Japanese Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  28. Nakano, M. (1997). The Policy-Making Process in Contemporary Japan. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  29. Okimoto, D. (1989). Between MITI and the Market: Japanese Industrial Policy for High Technology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Pempel, T. J. (1982). Policy and Politics in Japan: Creative Conservatism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Pempel, T. J. and K. Tsunekawa (1979). ‘Corporatism Without Labor? The Japanese Anomaly,’ in P. Schmitter and G. Lehmbruch, eds., Trend Toward Corporatist Intermediation. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, pp. 231–270.Google Scholar
  32. Portes, A. (1998). ‘Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology,’ Annual Review of Sociology 24: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Putnam, R. (1993). Making Democracy Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Samuels, R. (1987). The Business of the Japanese State: Energy Markets in Comparative and Historical Perspective. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Schmitter, P. (1981). ‘Interest intermediation and regime governability in contemporary Western Europe and North America,’ in S. Berger, ed., Organizing Interests in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 285–327.Google Scholar
  36. Stryker, R. (1994). ‘Rules, resources, and legitimacy processes: Some implications for social conflict, order and change, ’ American Journal of Sociology 99 (4): 847–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sugimoto, Y. (1986). ‘The manipulative basis of “consensus” in Japan,’ in G. McCormack and Y. Sugimoto, eds., Democracy in Contemporary Japan. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe Inc., pp. 65–75.Google Scholar
  38. Sugimoto, Y. (1997). An Introduction to Japanese Society. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Suzuki, A. (2000). ‘The transformation of the vision of labor unionism: Internal union politics in the Japanese steel industry in the 1960s,’ Social Science Japan Journal 3 (1): 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tsujinaka, Y. (1993). ‘Rengo and its osmotic networks,’ in G. Allinson and Y. Sone, eds., Political Dynamics in Contemporary Japan. Ithaca, NY: Cornell.Google Scholar
  41. Van Wolferen, K. (1989). The Enigma of Japanese Power. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  42. World Bank (2000). ‘Poverty net: Social capital for development,’

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey P. Broadbent
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of MinnesotaUSA

Personalised recommendations