Advertisement

Peasant federations and rural development policies in the Andes

  • Thomas F. Carroll
  • Anthony J. Bebbington
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter focuses on a special type of structural social capital embedded in second-tier indigenous peasant federations in the Andean countries. It first examines the manifestations of this social capital and then goes on to analyze the strategies of the various social actors for its use, mainly to further the interests of poor and oppressed members, but often in the service of broader societal or narrower partisan purposes. Cases are presented to illustrate how such a social capital resource, once created, can be used or transformed for other than the original purposes. Sometimes these spillovers are socially beneficial, confirming the mutability thesis of Hirschman (1984); but in other cases the diversions can be harmful and disempowering. The authors conclude that even considering these varied uses, meso-level peasant federations, when incorporated into rural development policies, can help to achieve equity and sustainability.

Keywords

Social Capital Civil Society Indigenous People Fair Trade Social Enterprise 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bebbington, A. (2001). Globalized Andes? Peasant Organizations, Livelihoods and Landscape. Forthcoming in Ecumene: A Journal of Cultural Geography, Vol. 8, No. 3.Google Scholar
  2. Bebbington, A. and T. Carroll (2000). Induced Social Capital and Federations of the Rural Poor. Social Capital Initiative Working Paper No. 19. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  3. Blair, H. (1997). Democratic Local Governance in Bolivia. USAID/CDIE Impact Evaluation No. 6.Google Scholar
  4. Blauert, J. and S. Zadek, eds. (1998). Mediating Sustainability — Growing Policy from the Grassroots. New Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, D. and D. Ashman (1996). `Participation and social capital and intersectoral problem solving,’ World Development 24 (9), 1467–1479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cameron, J. (2000). Municipal Decentralization in Rural Ecuador: A Political Opportunity for Democracy and Development? Paper prepared for the LASA Conference, Miami, March 16–18, 2000.Google Scholar
  7. Carroll, Th. F. (1998). `Indigenous organizations, protest and human rights in Ecuador,’ in J. D. Montgomery, ed., Human Rights — Positive Policies in Asia and the Pacific Rim. Hollis, NH: Hollis.Google Scholar
  8. Carter, M. and B. Barham (1996). `Level playing fields and laissez faire: postliberal development strategy in inegalitarian agrarian economies,’ World Development 24 (7), 1133–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Janvry, A., E. Sadoulet and E. Thorbecke (1993). `Introduction’ (to a set of papers for a conference on the changing balance between state, market and civil organizations in development strategies), World Development 21 (4), 565–575.Google Scholar
  10. Dobyns, H., P. Doughty and H. Lasswell (1971). Peasants Power and Applied Social Change-Vicos as a Model. Beverly Hills/London: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Doughty, P. (1987). ‘Against the odds: Collaboration and development at Vicos,’ in D. Stull and J. Schensul, eds., Collaborative Research and Social Change. Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 129–157.Google Scholar
  12. Durston, J. (1998). Building Social Capital in Rural Communities (Where It Does Not Exist). Paper prepared for the Latin American Studies Association Annual Meetings, Chicago, September 2426, 1998.Google Scholar
  13. Durston, J. (2000). Rural Football in Southern Andes and Social Capital. A Research Note, Santiago de Chile: Social Development Division ECLAC.Google Scholar
  14. Figueroa, J. A. (1997). `Comunidades indigenas: Artefactos de construcción de la identidad étnica en los conflictors politicos del Ecuador contemporaneo,’ Revista Colombiana de Antropologia 33, 186–216.Google Scholar
  15. Foley, M.W. and R. Edwards (1997). `Escape from politics? Social theory and the social capital debate, ’ American Behavioral Scientist 40 (6), 550–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fox, J. (1996). `How does civil society thicken? The political construction of social capital in Mexico,’ World Development 24 (6), 1089–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harriss, J. and P. De Renzio (1997). `Missing link’ or analytically missing? The concept of social capital: An introductory bibliographic essay,’ Journal of International Development 9 (7), 919–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hirschman, A. (1984). Getting Ahead Collectively: Grassroots Experiences in Latin America. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kleymeyer, Ch. D., ed. (1994). Cultural Expression and Grassroots Development: Cases from Latin America and the Caribbean. Boulder: Lynn Reinner.Google Scholar
  20. Lucero, J. (2000). Community, Nationality and Politics of Representation: Reflection from Ecuador.Google Scholar
  21. Paper prepared for the Conference of the Latin America Studies Association (LASA), Miami, March 16–18, 2000.Google Scholar
  22. Minkoff, D. C. (1997). `Producing social capital-National social movements and civil society,’ American Behavioral Scientist 40 (5), 606–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Montgomery, J. D. (1998). Bureaucrats and People-Grassroots Participation in Third World Development. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  24. North, L. L. and J. Cameron (1998). Grassroots-Based Rural Development Strategies: Ecuador in Comparative Perspective. Paper prepared for meeting of the Latin American Studies Association (LASA), Chicago: September 24–26, 1998.Google Scholar
  25. O’Neill, K. (1998). Social Capital in a Multi-Ethnic Society. Paper prepared for the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, September 3–6, 1998.Google Scholar
  26. Ostrom, E. (1992). Crafting Institutions for Self-Governing Irrigation Systems. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies.Google Scholar
  27. Pierce, M. H. (1997). `Popular participation bolivian style: Decentralizing political and economic power,’ Hemisphere 7 (3), 6–8.Google Scholar
  28. Psacharopoulos, G. and H. A. Patrinos (1994). Indigenous People and Poverty in Latin America: An Empirical Analysis. Washington: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Selverston, M. H. (1994). `The politics of culture: Indigenous peoples and the state in Ecuador,’ in D. Lee Van Cott, ed., Indigenous Peoples and Democracy in Latin America, New York: St. Martins Press.Google Scholar
  30. Uphoff, N. (1999). `Understanding social capital: Learning from the analysis and experience of participation,’ in P. Dasgupta and I. Serageldin, eds., Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
  31. Woolcock, M. (1998). `Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework,’ Theory and Society 27 (2), 151–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas F. Carroll
    • 1
  • Anthony J. Bebbington
    • 2
  1. 1.George Washington UniversityChevy ChaseUSA
  2. 2.University of ColoradoBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations