Immanent Justice and Ultimate Justice

Two Ways of Believing in Justice
  • Jürgen Maes
Part of the Critical Issues in Social Justice book series (CISJ)

Abstract

In a series of sophisticated experiments beginning in 1965, Melvin Lerner was able to demonstrate impressively how beliefs regarding justice can alter human reactions toward the innocent victims of misfortune—instead of sympathizing and helping the victim, subjects can be made to belittle his plight and even scorn him (for a summary, see Lerner, 1970; Lerner, Miller & Holmes, 1976). According to Lerner’s theory of justworld motivation, people assume that they live in a just world, in which each person gets what he deserves and deserves what he gets. Should a person witness clear injustice, this (potentially vital) belief in the justice of the world becomes threatened. Thus, people are motivated to maintain or reaffirm their belief in a just world, perhaps through personal or active engagement in the preservation of justice. Because the latter may often prove costly (if not impossible), people attempt to maintain their belief in a just world by simply ignoring injustice or reinterpreting the results of events such that the consequences appear to be just. If, for example, the victim himself has contributed to his misfortune, or appears to be a bad person, one might argue that he doesn’t deserve any better; in this manner, an incident of obvious injustice might paradoxically become evidence supporting a just world, and thus validate the observer ’s belief system. In his theoretical analyses of the topic, however, Melvin Lerner (1980) expressly points out that the devaluation of innocent victims is not the only strategy by which belief in a just world is preserved. Other strategies include the construction of many different worlds, of which only one—the one most relevant for the observer—must be just, or the assumption of various time perspectives.

Keywords

Partial Correlational Analysis Pastoral Counselor Mock Juror Innocent Victim Charitable Activity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ambrosio, A. L. and Sheehan. S. E. (1991). The just world belief and the AIDS epidemic. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 163 - 170.Google Scholar
  2. Bierhoff, H. W., Klein, R. and Kramp, P. (1991). Evidence for the altruistic personality from data on accident research. Journal of Personality, 59, 263 - 280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bortz, J. (1977). Lehrbuch der Statistik. Für Sozialwissenschaftler. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Bush, A., Krebs, D. L. and Carpendale, J. I. (1993). The structural consistency of moral judgments about AIDS. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 154, 167 - 175.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Connors, J. and Heaven, P. C. (1990). Belief in a just world and attitudes toward AIDS sufferers. Journal of Social Psychology, 130, 559 - 560.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dalbert, C. (1982). Der Glaube an eine gerechte Welt: Zur Güte einer deutschen Version der Skala von Rubin and Peplau. P.I.V.- Bericht Nr.3. (= Berichte aus der Arbeitsgruppe Verantwortung, Gerechtigkeit, Moral, Nr. 10 ). Trier: Universität Trier, Fachbereich I - Psychologie.Google Scholar
  7. Dalbert, C. and Katona-Sallay, H. (1993). Belief in a Just World in Europe: A Hungarian-German Comparison. University of Tübingen: Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
  8. Dalbert, C., Montada, L. and Schmitt, M. (1987). Glaube an eine gerechte Welt als Motiv: Validierungskorrelate zweier Skalen. Psychologische Beiträge, 29, 596-615.Google Scholar
  9. Furnham, A. (1990). The development of single trait personality theories. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 923 - 929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Glennon, F. and Joseph, S. (1993). Just world beliefs, self esteem, and attitudes towards homosexuals with AIDS. Psychological Reports, 72, 584 - 586.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gruman, J. C. and Sloan, R. P. (1983). Disease as justice: Perceptions of victims of physical illness. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 4, 39-46.Google Scholar
  12. Harper, D. J. and Manasse, P. R. (1992). The Just World and the Third World: British explanations for poverty abroad. Journal of Social Psychology, 132, 783-785.Google Scholar
  13. Jones, C. and Aronson, E. (1973). Attribution of fault to a rape victim as a function of respectability of the victim. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 415 - 419.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kerr, N. L. and Kurtz, S. T. (1977). Effects of a victim’s suffering and respectability on mock juror judgments: Further evidence on the just world theory. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 8, 42-56.Google Scholar
  15. Kushner, H. S. (1981). When bad things happen to good people. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
  16. Lerner, M. J. (1965). Evaluation of performance as a function of performer’s reward and attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 355 - 360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lerner, M.J. (1970). The desire for justice and reactions to victims. In J. Macaulay and L. Berkowitz (Eds.), Altruism and helping behavior (pp. 205 - 228 ). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world. A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  19. Lerner, M. J., Miller, D. and Holmes, J. G. (1976). Deserving and the emergence of forms of justice. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 9, (pp. 133 - 162 ). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. MacLean, M. J. and Chown, S. M. (1988). Just world beliefs and attitudes toward helping elderly people: A comparison of British and Canadian university students. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 26, 249-260.Google Scholar
  21. Maes, J. (1992). Konstruktion und Analyse eines mehrdimensionalen Gerechte-Welt-Fragebogens.(Berichte aus der Arbeitsgruppe Verantwortung, Gerechtigkeit, Moral, Nr. 64 ). Trier: Universität Trier, Fachbereich I Psychologie.Google Scholar
  22. Maes, J. (1994). Drakonität als Personmerkmal: Entwicklung und erste Erprobung eines Fragebogens zur Erfassung von Urteilsstrenge (Drakonität) versus Milde. (Berichte aus der Arbeitsgruppe Verantwortung, Gerechtigkeit, Moral Nr. 78 ). Trier: Universität Trier, Fachbereich I - Psychologie.,Google Scholar
  23. Miller, D. T. (1977). Altruism and threat to a belief in a just world. Journal of Eperimental Social Psychology, 13, 113 - 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Montada, L. (1992). Attribution of responsibility for losses and perceived injustice. In L. Montada, S.-H. Filipp and M.J. Lerner (Eds.), Life Crises and the Experience of Loss in Adulthood, (pp. 133 - 161 ). Hillsdale, N J. Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  25. Montada, L. and Schneider, A. (1989). Justice and emotional reactions to the disadvantaged. Social Justice Research, 3, 313 - 344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Montada, L. and Schneider, A. (1991). Justice and prosocial commitments. In: L. Montada and H. W. Bierhoff (Eds.), Altruism in social systems, (pp. 58 - 81 ). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  27. Murphy-Berman, V. and Berman, J. J. (1990). The Effect of Respondents’ Just World Beliefs and Target Person’s Social Worth and Awareness-of-Risk on Perceptions of a Person with AIDS. Social Justice Research, 4, 215 - 228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Olkin, I. (1967). Correlations revisited. In J. C. Stanley (Ed), Improving experimental design and statistical analysis. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  29. O’Quin, K. and Vogler, C. C. (1990). Use of the Just World Scale with prison inmates: A methodological note. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 70, 395-400.Google Scholar
  30. Piaget, J. (1932). Le jugement moral chez l’enfant. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
  31. Rubin, Z. and Peplau, L. A. (1973). Belief in a just world and reactions to another ’s lot: A study of participants in the National Draft Lottery. Journal of Social Issues, 29 (4), 73 - 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rubin, Z. and Peplau, L. A. (1975). Who believes in a just world? Journal of Social Issues, 31 (3), 65 - 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schmitt, M., Kilders, M., Mosle, A., Müller, L., Pfrengle, A., Rabenberg, H., Schott, E, Stolz, J., Suda, U., Williams, M. and Zimmermann, G.. (1991). Gerechte-Welt-Glaube, Gewinn und Verlust: Rechtfertigung oder ausgleichende Gerechtigkeit. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 22, 37-45.Google Scholar
  34. Schneider, A. (1988). Glaube an die gerechte Welt: Replikation der Validierungskorrelate zweier Skalen. (Berichte aus der Arbeitsgruppe Verantwortung, Gerechtigkeit, Moral Nr. 40 ). Trier: Universität Trier, Fachbereich I - Psychologie.Google Scholar
  35. Sherman, M. E, Smith, R. and Cooper, R. (1982). Reactions toward the dying: The effects of a patient’s illness and respondents’ belief in a just world. Omega Journal of Death and Dying, 13, 173-189.Google Scholar
  36. Sloan, R. P.and Gruman, J. C. (1983). Beliefs about cancer, heart disease, and their victims. Psychological Reports, 52, 415 - 424.Google Scholar
  37. Thornton, B., Ryckman, R. M. and Robbins, M. A. (1982). The relationships of observer characteristics to beliefs in the causal responsibility of victims of sexual assaults. Human Relations, 35, 321 - 330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Weir, J. A. and Wrightsman, L. S. (1990). The determinants of mock jurors’ verdicts in a rape case. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 901 - 919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zucker, G. S. and Weiner, B. (1993). Conservatism and perceptions of poverty: An attributional analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 925-943.Google Scholar
  40. Zuckerman, M., Gerbasi, K. C., Kravitz, R. I. and Wheeler, L. (1975). The belief in a just world and reactions to innocent victims. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 5, 326.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jürgen Maes
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversität TrierTrierGermany

Personalised recommendations