The Transcaucasian “Periphery” in the Bronze Age

A Preliminary Formulation
  • Philip L. Kohl
Part of the Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology book series (IDCA)


Fashionable interpretative models in late twentieth-century American archaeology often resemble earlier constructions that dominated the literature at the beginning of the century (see Schortman and Urban, Chapter 1, this volume). Neo-evolutionary schema that compare and type societies at similar “levels of development” and view them as universally passing through broadly defined, though essentially identical, “stages” of sociocultural complexity consciously recall nineteenth-century unilinear evolutionary models, despite their more nuanced qualifications and insistence upon multilinear paths of development. Criticisms of such neo-evolutionary models also recall the earlier critiques of evolutionism by the Boasians, as well as by so-called modified diffusionists like Childe. Again, the vocabulary today differs—concepts are more refined and subtly expressed—but the basic criticism of evolutionism remains: cultures do not pass through identical evolutionary stages for they are open-ended systems caught up in historical processes larger than themselves that inevitably interrupt, modify, facilitate, impair, or destroy their internal evolutionary development. Consideration of “interregional interaction” necessarily entails, in terms of the older terminology, the treatment of diffusionary processes in which societies or “archeological cultures” become involved in networks of contact, conflict, or exchange that differentially affect all the participant societies.


Iranian Plateau Burial Mound Cultural Deposit Indus Valley Interregional Interaction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abibullaev, 0., 1982, Eneolit i Bronza na Territorii Nakhichevanskoi ASSR. Elm, Baku.Google Scholar
  2. Andreeva, M., 1977, K Voprosu o Yuzhnykh Svyazakh Maikopskoi Kul’turi. Sovetskaya Arkeologiya 1: 39–56.Google Scholar
  3. Anthony, D., 1986, The ’Kurgan Culture’: A Reconsideration. Current Anthropology 27: 291–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burney, C., and D. Lang, 1971, The Peoples of the Hills: Ancient Ararat and Caucasus. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London.Google Scholar
  5. Chernykh, E., in press. Ancient Metallurgy in the USSR. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  6. Dales, G., 1977, Shifting Trade Patterns between the Iranian Plateau and the Indus Valley in the Third Millennium B.C. In Le Plateau Iranien et l’Asie Centrale des Origines d la Conquéte Islamique (ed. J. Deshayes ). CNRS, Paris, pp. 67–78.Google Scholar
  7. Dedabrishvili, S., 1979, Kurgani Alazanskoi Doliny. Metsniereba, Tbilisi.Google Scholar
  8. Dyson, R., Jr., 1973, The Archaeological Evidence of the Second Millennium B.C. on the Persian Plateau. In Cambridge Ancient History II: Part 1. The Middle East and the Aegean Region ca. 1800–1380 B.C. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 687–715.Google Scholar
  9. Dzhavakhishvili, A., and L. Glonti, 1962, Urbnisi I: Arkheologicheskie Raskopki Provedennye v 1954–1961 gg. na Selishche Kvatskhelebi (Tylenia Kokhi). Tbilisi.Google Scholar
  10. Gei, A., 1986, Pogrebenie Liteishchika Novotitorovskoi Kul’turi iz Nizhnego Prikubari ya. Arkheologicheskie Otkrytiya na Novostroikakh: Drevnosti Severnogo Kavkaza, Vol. I. Nauka, Moscow, pp. 13–32.Google Scholar
  11. Gevorkjan. A., 1980, Iz Istorii Drevneishei Metallurgii Armyanskogo Nagor’ya. Armenian Academy of Sciences, Yerevan.Google Scholar
  12. Gledhill, J., and M. Larsen, 1982, The Polanyi Paradigm and a Dynamic Analysis of Archaic States. In Theory and Explanation in Archaeology (ed. C. Renfrew, M. J. Rowlands, and B. A. Segraves ). Academic Press, New York, pp. 197–229.Google Scholar
  13. Glumac, P., and D. Anthony, n.d., Culture and Environment in the Prehistoric Caucasus: The Neolithic through the Early Bronze Age. In Chronologies in Old World Archaeology (3rd ed.) (ed. R. Ehrich). University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  14. Jarrige, J., 1986, Excavations at Mehragarh-Nowsharo. Pakistan Archaeology, Vols. 18–22 (19741986): 63–131.Google Scholar
  15. Jarrige, J., and M. Santoni, 1979, Fouilles de Pirak, Vols. I and I I. Diffusion de Bocard, Paris.Google Scholar
  16. Kavtaradze, G., 1983, K Khronologii Epokhi Eneolita i Bronzy Gruzii. Metsniereba, Tbilisi.Google Scholar
  17. Khanzadjan, E., 1985, Araratskaya Dolina v Kontse IV - Nachale I tis. do N. E. Doctoral dissertation abstract, Yerevan.Google Scholar
  18. Khanzadjan, E., and B. Piotrovskii, 1984, Tsilindricheskaya Pechat’ c Drevneegipetskoi Ieroglificheskoi Nadpis’yu iz Metsamorskogo Mogil’nika. Istoriko-Filologicheskii Zhurnal 4: 59–65.Google Scholar
  19. Khanzadjan, E., G. Sarkisjan, and I. Diakonoff, 1983, Vavilonskaya Girya XVI v. do N. E. c Klinopisnoi Nadpis’yu iz Metsamora. Drevnii Vostok 4:113–122.Google Scholar
  20. Kohl, P., 1984, L’Asie Centrale: des Origines k l’Age du Fer. Synthése 14, Editions Recherche sur les Civilisations, Paris, A.D.P.F.Google Scholar
  21. Kohl, P., 1985, Recent Research in Central Asia. American Antiquity 50: 789–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kohl, P., 1987, The Use and Abuse of World System Theory: The Case of the “Pristine” West Asian State. In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 11 (ed. M. Schiffer).Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–35.Google Scholar
  23. Korobkova, G., 1987, Khozyaistvennie Kompleksi Rannikh Zemledel’cheskoskotovodcheskikh Obshchestv Yuga SSSR. Nauka, Leningrad.Google Scholar
  24. Kuftin, B., 1941, Arkheologicheskie Raskopki v Trialet. Georgian Academy of Sciences, Tbilisi.Google Scholar
  25. Kushnareva, K., 1983, K Probleme Vydeleniya Arkheologicheskikh Kul’tur Perioda Srednei Bronzy na Yuzhnom Kavkaze. Kratkie Soobshcheniya Instituta Arkheologii 176: 9–15.Google Scholar
  26. Kushnareva, K., 1985, Sevano-Uzerlikskaya Kul’tura Perioda Srednei Bronzy na Territorii Yuzh-nogo Kavkaza. In Kul’turnoe Nasledie Vostoka. Nauka, Leningrad.Google Scholar
  27. Kushnareva, K., 1986, Yuzhnii Kavkaz v. VI-II tis. do N. E. (Eta pi Kul’turnogo i Sotsial’no-Ekonomicheskogo Razvitiya). Doctoral dissertation abstract. Yerevan.Google Scholar
  28. Kushnareva, K., and T. Chubinishvili, 1970, Drevnie Kul’turi Yuzhnogo Kavkaza (V-III tis. do N. E.). Nauka, Leningrad.Google Scholar
  29. Munchaev, R., 1975, Kavkaz na Zare Bronzovogo Veka. Nauka, Moscow.Google Scholar
  30. Munchaev, R., 1982, Chast’ II: Eneolit Kavkaza. In Eneolit SSSR (in the series Arkheologiya SSSR). Nauka, Moscow.Google Scholar
  31. Narimanov, I., 1985, Obeidskiye Plemena Mesopotamii v Azerbaidzhane. Abstracts of papers delivered at Vsesoyuznaya Arkheologicheskaya Konferentsiya Dostizheniya Sovetskoi Arkheologii v XI Pyatiletke. Baku, pp. 271–272.Google Scholar
  32. Pitskhelaouri, K., 1984, Bronze Moyen: Richesses des Tumulus. Historie et Archéologie 88: 38–45.Google Scholar
  33. Pitskhelauri, K., 1979, Vostochnaya Gruziya v Kontse Bronzovogo Veka. Metsniereba, Tbilisi.Google Scholar
  34. Plashchev, A., and V. Chekmarev, 1978, Gidrografiya SSSR. Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad.Google Scholar
  35. Rubinson, K., 1977, The Chronology of the Middle Bronze Kurgans at Trialeti. In Mountains and Lowlands: Essays in the Archaeology of Greater Mesopotamia (ed. L. Levine and T. Young, Jr.).Undena Publications, Malibu, pp. 236–249.Google Scholar
  36. Sagona, A., 1984, The Caucasian Region in the Early Bronze Age,Vols. 1–3. British Archaeological Report International Series 214, Oxford.Google Scholar
  37. Schortman, E., and P. Urban, 1987, Modelling Interregional Interaction in Prehistory. In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 11 (ed. M. Schiffer ). Academic Press, New York, pp. 37–95.Google Scholar
  38. Telegin, D., 1986, Dereivka: A Settlement and Cemetery of Copper Age Horse Keepers on the Middle Dnieper. British Archaeological Reports International Series 287, Oxford.Google Scholar
  39. Trifonov, V., 1983, Stepnoe Prikuban’e v Epokhu Rannei i Srednei Bronzy (Periodizatsiya i Kul’turnoIstoricheskaya Kharakteristika). Doctoral dissertation abstract, Leningrad.Google Scholar
  40. Weiss, H., 1986, The Origins of Tell Leilan and the Conquest of Space in Third Millennium Mesopotamia. In The Origins of Cities in Dry Farming Syria and Mesopotamia in the Third Millennium B.C. (ed. H. Weiss ). Four Quarters, Guilford, pp. 71–108.Google Scholar
  41. Zimansky, P., 1985, Ecology and Empire: The Structure of the Urartian State (Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization, No. 41 ). Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philip L. Kohl
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyWellesley CollegeWellesleyUSA

Personalised recommendations