Channeling and Related Phenomena for GeV Particles

  • E. Uggerhøj
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSB, volume 165)

Abstract

Already in the original channeling paper by Lindhardl it was shown that the correlated scatterings of a projectile incident along a crystalline row of atoms can be studied by classical mechanics even when the individual scattering events are not amenable to a classical treatment. The condition for the classical model is that the projectile mass is large compared to the rest mass of the electron. Although this was very surprising it was even more surprising that many aspects of channeling for keV-MeV electrons/positrons could be understood from the same classical model. This was based on the fact that in the transverse motion it is the relativistic mass that enters. Later it was shown that axial effects are more classical than planar ones and that positrons are more classical than electrons.

Keywords

Incident Angle Angular Resolution Drift Chamber Germanium Crystal Exit Side 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. Lindhard, K. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk. Mat. Fys. Medd. 34: 14 (1965).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    O. Fich, J. A. Golovchenko, K. O. Lett. 57B:90 (1975). Nielsen, E. Uggerhoj, G. Charpak, and F. Sauli, Phys. Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. Allen, D. Gockley, G. Lazo, W. Gibson, H. Wegner, and A. Kanofsky, Nuovo Cimento Lett. 15: 529 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    I. A. Grishaev, G. D. Kovalenko, and B. I. Schramenko, Sov. Phys. JETP 45 (2): 229 (1977).ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. Uggerhoj, in: “Proceedings from the Symposium on Selected Topics in Physics in Honor of Jens Lindhard’s 60th Birthday,” Physica Scripta 28:331 (1983).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Esbensen, O. Fich, J. A. Golovchenko, K. O. Nielsen, E. Uggerhøj, C. VraastThomsen, G. Charpak, S. Majewski, F. Sauli, and J. P. Ponpon, Nucl. Phys. B127: 281 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. K. Andersen, O. Fich, H. Nielsen, H. E. SchiOtt, E. Uggerhoj, C. Vraast-Thomsen, G. Charpak, G. Petersen, F. Sauli, J. P. Ponpon, and P. Siffert, Nucl. Phys. B167: 1 (1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. F. Bak, G. Melchart, E. Uggerhoj, J. S. Forster, P. R. Jensen, H. Madsboll, S. P. Moller, G. Petersen, H. E. Schiott, R. Regall, and P. Siffert, Phys. Rev. A25: 1334 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. Lervig, J. Lindhard, and V. Nielsen, Nucl. Phys. A96: 481 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    N. Bohr, K. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk. Mat. Fys. Medd. 18: 8 (1948).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. Uggerhoj, Phys. Lett. 22:382 (1966); E. Uggerhøj and J. U. Andersen, Can. J. Phys. 46: 543 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. U. Andersen, W. M. Augustyniak, and E. Uggerhøj, Phys. Rev. B3: 705 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. U. Andersen, S. Kjwr Andersen, and W. M. Augustyniak, K. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk. Mat. Fys. Medd. 39: 281 (1977).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    E. Uggerhoj, F. Frandsen, Phys. Rev. B2:582 (1970); S. K. Andersen, F. Bell, F. Frandsen, and E. Uggerhoj, Phys. Rev. B8: 4913 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    R. A. Carrigan, B. L. Chrisman, T. E. Toohig, W. M. Gibson, I. J. Kim, C. R. Sun, Z. Guzik, T. S. Nigmanov, E. N. Tsyganov, A. S., Vodopianov, M. A. Hasan, A. S. Kanofsky, R. Allen, J. Kubic, D. H. Stork, and A. B. Watson, Nucl. Phys. B163: 1 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. R. Dangerfield, Phys. Lett. A46: 19 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    H. Genz, C. Brendel, P. Eschwey, U. Kuhn, W. Löwe, A, Richter, P. Seserko, and R. Sauerwein, Z. Phys. A305:9 (1982). P. Amundsen, Phys. Lett. A89: 417 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. Bak, F. E. Meyer, J.B.B. Petersen, E. Uggerhøj, K. ostergaard, S. P. Moller, A. H. Sorensen, and P. Siffert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51: 1163 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. Bak, F. E. Meyer, J.B.B. Petersen, E. Uggerhøj, K. ostergaard, S. P. Moller, A. H. Sorensen, and P. Siffert, Phys. Scripta 33:147–155 (1986). A. H. Sorensen and E. Uggerhoj. Siffert, Phys. Scripta 33:147–155 (1986). A. H. Sorensen and E. Uggerhoj, “The hunt for the density effect in inner shell excitations, ” Comments on Atomic and Molecular Physics, Vol. 17, No. 6, 285–308 (1986).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    P. A. Amundsen and K. J. Aashamar, Phys. B14 L153 (1981) and private communications.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    H. Bichsel and R. P. Saxon, Phys. Rev. A11: 1286 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22. J. Bak, A. Busenkov, J. Petersen, E. Uggerhøj S. P. Moller, and P. Siffert, “Large departures from Landau distributions for high-energy particles traversing thin Si and Ge targets,” to appear in Nucl. Phys. B. Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    S. K. Andersen, H. Esbensen, O. Fich, J. A. Golovchenko, H. Nielsen, H. E. Schiott, E. Uggerhoj, C. Vraast-Thomsen, G. Charpak, G. Petersen, F. Sauli, J. P. Ponpon, and R. Siffert, Nucl. Phys. B144: 1–21 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    E. Bonderup, H. Esbensen, J. U. Andersen, and H. E. Schiott, Rad. Eff. 12:261 (1972). H. E. Schiott, E. Bonderup, J. U. Andersen, and H. Esbensen, Atomic Collision in Solids, Gatlinburg Conf. ed. by S. Datz, B. R. Appler, and C. D. Moak, Plenum Press, Vol. 2, p. 843 (1975).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    C. R. Sun, W. M. Gibson, I. J. Kim, and G. O. Williams, M. A. Hasan, A. S. Kanofsky, R. Allen, R. A. Carrigan, Jr., B. L. Chrisman, T. E. Toohig, Z. Guzik, T. S. Nigmanov, E. N. Tsyganov, A. S. Vodopianov, A. B. Watson, J. Kubie, and D. H. Stork, Nucl. Phys. B203: 40 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    P. R. Jensen, Thesis, Aarhus, 1980.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    J. F. Bak, J. A. Ellison, B. Marsh, F. E. Meyer, O. Pedersen, J.B.B. Petersen, E. Uggerhoj, K. Ostergaard, S. P. Moller; A. H. Sorensen, and M. Suffert, Nucl. Phys. B254: 491–527 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    V. V. Beloshitsky and F. F. Komarov, Phys. Rep. 93 (3) (1983).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    J. U. Andersen, E. Bonderup and R. H. Pantell, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 33: 453 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    M. Pisharody, Thesis, SUNY-Albany (1984).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    N. F. Shulga, L. E. Gendenshtein, I. I. Miroschnichenko, E. V. Pegushin, S. P. Formin, and R. O. Avakyan, Soy. Phys. JETP 55 (1): 30 (1982).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    N. A. Filatova, V. M. Golovatyuk, A. N. Iskakov, I. M. Ivanchenko, R. B. Kadyrov, N. N. Karpenko, T. S. Nigmanov, V. V. Palchik, V. D. Riabstov, M. D. Shafranov, E. N. Tsyganov, I. A. Tyapkin, D. V. Uralski, A. Forycki, Z. Guzik, J. Wojtkowska, R. A. Carrigan, Jr., T. E. Toohig, C. Carmack, W. M. Gibson, I. J. Kim, C. R. Sun, M. D. Bavichev, N. K. Bulgakov, N. I. Zimin, I. A. Grishaev, G. D. Kovalenko, B. I. Shramenko, E. I. Denisov, V. I. Glebov, and V. V. Avdeichikov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48: 488–492 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    A. O. Agan’yants, Yu. A. Vartanov, and G. A. Vatapetyan, Soy. Phy. JETP Lett., 42 (2): 399 (1985).ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Uggerhøj
    • 1
  1. 1.CERNGenevaSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations