Abstract
The concepts of patriotism, identity, identification, narcissism, and chauvinism are the center of numerous discussions about the nature of nationalism and national ideologies. Is each and any kind of nationalism potentially pernicious and destructive? Can there be cases of “healthy”, positive, and productive national self-regard? This chapter is part of the discussion which has been going on the in West for generations. Earlier chapters in this book, especially those by Moses and Suleiman, set the stage for this case study by Brunner. The phenomenon under investigation is the appearance of public stocktaking and soul-searching within the Israeli elite vis-à-vis the obvious injustice done to the Palestinians by the Zionist project. Actually, this phenomenon goes back a hundred years, but the critical voices have become stronger in recent years, as Palestinian resistance and doubts about Zionism have grown. Brunner uses this case study to apply Kohut’s idea of “good” narcissism, which shook up the world of psychoanalysis when it was first introduced. His conclusion is that a “mature”, well-balanced kind of national identity is not only desirable, but possible, and may even be within reach.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aloni, N. (1999). Gentlemen, history is stormy. Ha’aretz, 10 December [Hebrew].
Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
Avishai, B. (2000). Post-Zionist Israel. The American Prospect, 11 (12), May 8.
Bartal, I. (1999). “Old-new history.” Ha ‘aretz, 21 October [Hebrew].
Baumel, A. (1999). A pluralist view, not a myth-destroyer. 15 December, Ha ‘aretz Book Review Supplement [Hebrew].
Beit-Hallahmi, B. (1993). Original Sins: Reflections on the History of Zionism and Israel. New York: Interlink.
Beit-Hallahmi, B. (2002). Political and literary answers to some “Jewish Question”: Proust, Joyce, Freud, and Herzl. In this volume.
B’nai B’rith News (2000). http://bnaihrith org/pr/zalman087900 html, downloaded 21/06/01.
Briman, R. (1999). Cut post-Zionist education. Ha’aretz, 31 August [Hebrew].
Bronner, E. (1999). In Israel, new grade school texts for history replace myths with facts. New York Times, August 14.
Brunner, J. (1997/98). Pride and memory: Nationalism, narcissism and the historians’ debates in Germany and Israel. History and Memory, 9, 256 – 300.
Eldar, A. (2000a). Education and lies: Who took over the history books? Ha ‘aretz, 24 August [Hebrew].
Eldar, A. (2000b). Dr. Hasony’s spiritual leader. Ha ‘aretz, 14 September [Hebrew].
Freud, S. (1914). On narcissism: An introduction. In the Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. Vol. 14, 73 – 102. London: Hogarth Press
Gans, C. (2001). Historical rights: The evaluation of nationalist claims to sovereignty. Political Theory, 29, 58 – 79.
Golan, A. (2000). A lesson in how to turn people off Zionism. Ha ‘aretz, 30 November. Downloaded from the English Internet Edition 26/06/01.
Grodzinsky, Y. (1995). Something nevertheless is missing in this story. Ha ‘aretz,3 May [Hebrew].
Halkin, H. (1999). Was Zionism unjust? Commentary, November.
Himmelfarb, G. (1987). The New History and the Old: Critical Essays and Reappraisals. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
History and Memory, 1995. Vol. 7, no. 1. Special Issue: Israeli historiography revisited.
Karpel, D. (1995). The national camp. Ha ‘aretz Magazine, 9 June [Hebrew].
Karpel, D. (1996). Ready to pay the price. Ha ‘aretz Magazine, 9 February [Hebrew].
Karpel, D. (2001). Independent in the field. Ha ‘aretz Magazine, 20 July [Hebrew].
Kohut, H. (1971). The Analysis of the Self New York: International Universities Press.
Karpin, M. (2000). On his record. Ha ‘aretz Book Review Supplement, 22 September. Downloaded from English Internet Edition, 26/06/01.
Karsh, E. (1996). Fabricating Israeli History: The “New Historians “. London: Frank Cass.
Kim, H. (2001). The post-Zionist ghosts and Sharon and Livnat. Ha’aretz, 13 March [Hebrew].
Kimmerling, B. (2000). From the Haganah chronology. Ha ‘aretz, 16 May [Hebrew].
Kohut, H. (1966). Forms and transformations of narcissism. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 14, 243 – 272.
Kohut, H. (1972). Thoughts on narcissism and narcissistic rage. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 27, 360 – 398.
Kohut, H. (1977). The Restoration of the Self New York: International Universities Press.
Kohut, H. (1984). How Does Analysis Cure? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kohut, H. (1985). Self Psychology and the Humanities: Reflections on a New Psychoanalytic Approach. New York: Norton.
Kohut, H. and. Wolf, E.S. (1986). The disorders of the self and their treatment: An outline. In A.P. Morrison. (Ed.). Essential Papers on Narcissism. New York: New York University Press.
Kol Ha ‘ir, (1995). Zionism: The battle for rating. 6 October [Hebrew].
Lahav, P. (2001). A “Jewish state... to be known as the State of Israel”: Notes on Israeli legal historiography. Law and History Review, 19, 387 – 433.
Laqueur, W. (1998). Acute culture war in Israel. http:iiwww.nzz.chienglish/background 1998/background9806/bg980620/israel. downloaded 21/06/01.
Levy, G. (2000). Perhaps there was no other possibility; but why lie all these years? Ha ‘aretz, 1 November [Hebrew].
Livneh, N. (2001). The rise and fall of post-Zionism. Ha ‘aretz Magazinet, 14 September [Hebrew].
Morris, B. (1988). The new historiography: Israel confronts its past. Tikkun, Nov.-Dec.
Mahler, J. (1997). Uprooting the past: Israel’s new historians take a hard look at their nation’s past. Lingua Franca, August.
Megged, A. (1994). The Israeli suicide impulse. Ha ‘aretz Magazine, 10 June [Hebrew].
Megged, A. (1999). Enlightened like the brightness of the sky. Ha ‘aretz, 14 September [Hebrew].
Morris, B. (1997). I did a Zionist deed. Ha ‘aretz, 16 June [Hebrew].
Moses, R. (1982) The group self and the Arab-Israeli conflict. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 9, 55 – 64.
Neuberger, B. (2000). McCarthyism, Israel-style. Ha ‘aretz Book Review Supplement, 22 September. Downloaded from English Internet Edition, 26/06/01.
Pappé, I. (1994a). The influence of the Zionist ideology on Israeli historiography. Davar Supplement, 15 May [Hebrew].
Pappé, I. (1994b). A lesson in New History. Ha ‘aretz Magazine, 24 June [Hebrew].
Pappé, I. (1995). Critique and agenda: The post-Zionist scholars in Israel. History and Memory, 7, 66 – 90.
Pappé, I. (1999a). Touching a raw nerve. Ha ‘aretz, 15 September [Hebrew].
Pappé, I. (1999b). The tribunal of academe. Ha ‘aretz, 12 November [Hebrew].
Pappé, I. (2001). Zionism as a colonial movement. Ha ‘aretz, 20 May [Hebrew].
Peled, Y. (1999). The worried Zionists. Theory and Criticism, 15, 135–143 [Hebrew].
Penslar, J.D. (1995). Innovation and revisionism in Israeli historiography. History and Memory, 7, 125 – 146.
Peterberg, G. (1994). The Stalinist. Ha ‘aretz Magazine, 17 June [Hebrew].
Peri, Y. (1994). The withdrawal into the private gardens. Davar Magazine, 22 July [Hebrew].
Rabinowitz, D. (1994a). Israel’s original sin. Ha ‘aretz, 10 April [Hebrew].
Rabinowitz, D. (1994b). A confusing texture composed of shades of gray. Ha ‘aretz, 15 June, [Hebrew].
Ram, U. (1994a). Post-Zionist ideology. Ha ‘aretz, 8 April [Hebrew].
Ram, U. (1994b). The post-Zionist debate: Five notes of clarification. Davar Magazine. 8 July [Hebrew].
Rotem, T. (2001). Always a political minister. Ha ‘aretz, 4 May [Hebrew].
Rubinstein, A. (1997). The revolution failed, Zionism succeeded. Ha ‘aretz, 10 June [Hebrew].
Rubinstein, A. (1999). Old history, but accurate. Ha ‘aretz, 30 September [Hebrew].
Rubinstein, A. (2001). I transgressed the prohibition. Ha ‘aretz Magazine, 3 August [Hebrew].
Sa’ar, R. (1999a). Who threatens the official in charge of the history curriculum? Ha ‘aretz, 13 September [Hebrew].
Sa’ar, R. (1999b). Threatening letters to the author the new grade nine history textbook. Ha ‘aretz, 14 September [Hebrew].
Sadeh, S. (1997). The indictment: Fabricating history. Ha ‘aretz Magazine. 2 May [Hebrew].
Said, E. (1998). New history, old ideas. Al Ahram 378, 21-27 May. http://www.ahram.org.eg/weekly/1998/378/pal2.htm, downloaded 21/06/01.
Samet, G. (1996). Culture and history. Ha ‘aretz, 9 February [Hebrew].
Scheff, T. (1994). Emotions and identity: A theory of ethnic nationalism. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Social Theory and the Politics of Identity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Segev, T. (1999). Look what you did to my myth. Ha ‘aretz, 17 September [Hebrew].
Segev, T. (2000). Damascus against the New Historians. Ha ‘aretz, 7 January [Hebrew].
Shafir, G. (1995). The colonial question. Ha ‘aretz, 10 January [Hebrew].
Shapira, A. (1995). Politics and collective memory: The debate over the “New Historians” in Israel. History and Memory, 7, 9 – 40.
Shapira, A. (1999). The past is not a foreign country. The New Republic, 29 November.
Theory and Criticism: An Israeli Forum (1996). Issue no. 8 [Hebrew].
Sid-Ahmed, M. (1999) Israel’s new historians. Al-Ahram 450, 7–13 October http://www.ahram.org.eg/weekly/1999/450/op3.htm, downloaded 21/06/01
Siwan, E. (1997). The New Historians and the promise that wasn’t kept. Ha’aretz Book Review Supplement, 25 June [Hebrew].
Tevet, S. (1999). New Historians or political activists. Ha’aretz Book Review Supplement, 15 December. [Hebrew]
Thompson, E.P. (1982). Beyond the Cold War. London: Merlin.
Weitz, Y. (Ed.) (1997). From Vision to Revision: A Hundred Years of the Historiography of Zionism. Jerusalem: Zalman Shazar Center [Hebrew].
Yogev, E. (1999). Who is afraid of critical history? Ha’aretz, 6 September [Hebrew].
Zand, S. (1999). The cries of the hyenas and the silence of the lambs. Ha’aretz, 16 September [Hebrew].
Zuckerman, M. (2002) Towards a critical analysis of Israeli political culture. In this volume.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brunner, J. (2002). Contentious Origins: Psychoanalytic Comments on the Debate over Israel’s Creation. In: Bunzl, J., Beit-Hallahmi, B. (eds) Psychoanalysis, Identity, and Ideology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6324-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6324-9_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5299-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-6324-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive