Skip to main content

Why Power Indices and Coalition Formation?

  • Chapter
Power Indices and Coalition Formation

Abstract

This introductory note discusses the main arguments that motivate the growing interest in power indices and the theory of coalition formation that also determine the selection of contributions to this volume. The main arguments are those of substantial growth in the application of power indices to political institutions, especially the European Union, the intensive discussion of the monotonicity properties of various indices, and the probabilistic interpretation of power, coalition formation, and power measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allingham, M.G. (1975), “Economic Power and Values of Games”, Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie (Journal of Economics), 35, 293–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B. (1980), “Is it Better to be Powerful or Lucky: Part I and Part II”, Political Studies, 28, 183–194 and 338–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brams, S.J., and P.C. Fishburn (1995), “When is Size a Liability? Bargaining Power in Minimal Winning Coalitions”, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 7, 301–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.S. (1971), “Control of Collectivities and the Power of a Collectivity to Act”, in: B. Lieberman (ed.), Social Choice, New York: Gordon and Breach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957), An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyer, J., and A. Schotter (1980), “Power Relationship in the International Monetary Fund: The Consequences of Quota Changes”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 62, 97–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubey, P., and L.S. Shapley (1979), “Mathematical Properties of the Banzhaf Power Index”, Mathematics of Operations Research, 4, 99–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenthal, D., and M. Machover (1995), “Postulates and Paradoxes of Relative Voting Power–A Critical Appraisal”, Theory and Decision, 38, 195–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenthal, D., and M. Machover (1998), The Measurement of Voting Power. Theory and Practice, Problems and Paradoxes, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenthal, D., M. Machover, and W. Zwicker (1998), “The Bicameral Postulates and Indices of A Priori Voting Power”, Theory and Decision, 44, 83–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbum, P.C., and S.J. Brams (1996), “Minimal Winning Coalitions in Weighted-Majority Voting Games”, Social Choice and Welfare, 13, 397–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C., and W.V. Gehrlein (1977), “Collective Rationality versus Distribution of Power of Binary Social Choice Functions”, Journal of Economic Theory, 16, 72–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freixas, J., and G. Gambarelli (1997), “Common Internal Properties Among Power Indices”, Control and Cybernetics, 26, 591–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, G., and G. Tsebelis (1999), “Why Resist the Temptation to Apply Power Indices to the EU”, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 11, 321–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holler, M.J. (1978), “A Priori Party Power and Government Formation”, Munich Social Science Review, 1, 25–41 (reprinted in: M.J. Holler (ed.) (1982), Power, Voting, and Voting Power, Würzburg-Vienna: Physica.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holler, M.J. (1982), “Forming Coalitions and Measuring Voting Power”, Political Studies, 30, 262–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holler, M.J. (1997), “Power Monotonicity and Expectations”, Control and Cybernetics, 26, 605–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holler, M.J., and E.W. Packel (1983), “Power, Luck and the Right Index”, Zeitschrift fiir Nationalökonomie (Journal of Economics), 43, 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holler, M.J., R. Ono, and F. Steffen (1999), “Constrained Monotonicity and the Measurement of Power”, Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsforschung, No. 107, Sozial-ökonomisches Seminar der Universität Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holler, M.J., and M. Widgrén (1999), “Why Power Indices for Assessing EU Decision-Making?”, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 11, 291–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isbell, J.R. (1958), “A Class of Simple Games”, Duke Mathematics Journal, 25, 423–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machover, M. (2000), “Notions of A Priori Voting Power: Critique of Holler and Widgrén”, Homo Oeconomicus, 16, 415–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N.R. (1982), “Power in Game Forms”, in: M.J. Holler (ed.), Power, Voting, and Voting Power, Würzburg-Vienna: Physica (reprinted in Homo Oeconomicus, 16, 1999, 219–243 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Napel, S., and M. Widgrén (2001), “The Power of an Inferior Player”, Jahrbuch für Neue Politische Ökonomie, 20, Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurmi, H. (1998), Rational Behaviour and the Design of Institutions: Concepts, Theories and Models, Cheltenham, UK, and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, G. (1972), “Multilinear Extensions of Games”, Management Science, 18, 64–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, G. (1975), “Multilinear Extensions and the Banzhaf Value”, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 22, 741–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, G. (1977), “Values of Games with A Priori Unions”, in: R. Henn, and O. Moeschlin (eds.), Essays in Mathematical Economics and Game Theory, Berlin and New York: Springer-Verlag, 76–88.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Owen G. (1982), “Modification of the Banzhaf-Coleman Index for Games with A Priori Unions”, in: M.J. Holler (ed.), Power, Voting, and Voting Power, Würzburg-Vienna: Physica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schotter, A. (1982), “The Paradox of Redistribution: Some Theoretical and Empirical Results”, in: M.J. Holler (ed.), Power, Voting, and Voting Power, Würzburg-Vienna: Physica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, L.S. (1953), “A Value for n-Person Games”, in: H. Kuhn, and A.W. Tucker (eds.), Contributions to the Theory of Games II, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, L.S., and M. Shubik (1954), “A Method of Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System”, American Political Science Review, 48, 787–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenlund, H., J.-E. Lane, and B. Bjurulf (1985), “Formal and real voting power”, European Journal of Political Economy, 1, 59–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straffin, P.D. (1977), Homogeneity, Independence, and Power Indices“, Public Choice, 30, 107–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straffin, P.D. (1988), “The Shapley-Shubik and the Banzhaf Power Index as Probabilities”, in: A.E. Roth (ed.), The Shapley Value: Essays in Honor of Lloyd S. Shapley, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsebelis, G., and G. Garrett (1996), “Agenda Setting Power, Power Indices, and Decision-Making in the European Union”, International Review of Law and Economics, 16, 345–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsebelis, G., and G. Garrett (1997), “Why Power Indices Cannot Explain Decisionmaking in the European Union”, in: D. Schmidtchen, and R. Cooter (eds.) Constitutional Law and Economics of the European Union, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnovec, F. (1997), “Power, Power Indices and Intuition”, Control and Cybernetics, 26, 613–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnovec, F. (1998), “Monotonicity and Power Indices”, in: T.J. Stewart, and R.C. van den Honert (eds.), Trends in Multicriteria Decision-Making, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems 465, Berlin et al.: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widgren, M. (1994), “Voting Power in the EC and the Consequences of Two Different Enlargements”, European Economic Review, 38, 1153–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widgren, M. (1995), “Probabilistic Voting Power in the EU Council: the Cases of Trade Policy and Social Regulation”, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 97, 345–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Holler, M.J., Owen, G. (2001). Why Power Indices and Coalition Formation?. In: Holler, M.J., Owen, G. (eds) Power Indices and Coalition Formation. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6221-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6221-1_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-4893-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-6221-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics