Interactive Playback: A Finely Tuned Response

  • Torben Dabelsteen
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 228)


Animal vocal communication is usually interactive when individuals are active at the same time; their acoustic signals influence each other’s behaviour, sometimes resulting in complicated types of vocal co-ordination. The highly variable singing behaviours performed by male blackbirds, Turdus merula, at dawn are a good example of such effects (the general features of blackbird song necessary to understand this example are described in Box I).


Song Type Motif Part Vocal Interaction Test Bird Sound Element 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Clark, C.W., Ellison, W.T. and Beeman, K. 1986. Acoustic tracking and distribution of migrating bowhead whales, Baleana mysticetus, off Point Barrow, Alaska in the spring of 1984. Rep. int. Whal. Comm., 36, 502.Google Scholar
  2. Dabelsteen, T. 1984. An analysis of the full song of the blackbird Turdus merula with respect to message coding and adaptations for acoustic communication. Omis Scand., 15, 227–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dabelsteen, T. 1985. Messages and meanings of bird song with special reference to the blackbird (Turdus merula) and some methodology problems. Biol. Skr. Dan. Vid. Selsk., 25, 173–208.Google Scholar
  4. Dabelsteen, T. 1988. The meaning of the full song of the blackbird Turdus merula to untreated and oestradiol-treated females. Omis Scand., 19, 7–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dabelsteen, T. and Pedersen, S.B. 1985. Correspondence between messages in the full song of the blackbird Turdus merula and meanings to territorial males, as inferred from responses to computerized modifications of natural song. Z. Tierpsychol., 69, 149–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dabelsteen, T. and Pedersen, S.B. 1988. Song parts adapted to function both at long and short ranges may communicate information about the species to female blackbirds (Turdus merula). Ornis Scand., 19, 195–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dabelsteen, T. and Pedersen, S.B. 1990. Song and information about aggressive responses of blackbirds, Turdus merula: evidence from interactive playback experiments with territory owners. Anim. Behay., 40, 1158–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dabelsteen, T. and Pedersen, S.B. 1991. A portable digital sound emitter for interactive playback of animal vocalizations. Bioacoustics, 3, 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dabelsteen, T. and Pedersen, S.B. submitted. Song features essential for species discrimination and behaviour assessment by male blackbirds (Turdus merula).Google Scholar
  10. Dabelsteen, T., Larsen, O.N. and Pedersen, S.B. submitted. Habitat induced degradation of sound signals: quantifying the effect of communication sounds and bird location on blurring, excess attenuation and signal-to-noise ratio in blackbird song.Google Scholar
  11. Dabelsteen, T., McGregor, P.K., Shepherd, M., Whittaker, X. and Pedersen, S.B. in prep. The signal value of overlapping versus alternating during matched singing in great tits (Parus major).Google Scholar
  12. Falls, J.B., Krebs, J.R. and McGregor, P.K. 1982. Song matching in the Great tit (Parus major): the effect of similarity and familiarity. Anim. Behay., 30, 997–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gompertz, T. 1961. The vocabulary of the great tit. Br. Birds, 54, 369418.Google Scholar
  14. Kramer, H.G., Lemon, R.E. and Morris, M.J. 1985. Song switching and agonistic stimulation in the song sparrow (Melospiza melodia): five tests. Anim. Behay., 33, 135–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Krebs, J.R., Ashcroft, R. and van Orsdol, K. 1981. Song matching in the great tit (Parus major L.). Anim. Behay., 29, 918–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kroodsma, D.E. 1971. Song variations and singing behaviour in the rufous-sided towhee Pipilio erythropthalmus. Condor, 73, 303–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kroodsma, D.E. 1979. Vocal duelling among male marsh wrens: evidence for ritualized expression of dominance/subordinance. Auk, 96, 506–515.Google Scholar
  18. Lemon, R.E. 1968a. Coordinated singing by black-crested titmice. Can. J. Zool., 46, 1163–1167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lemon, R.E. 1968b. The relation between organization and function of song in cardinals. Behaviour, 32, 158–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Magyar, I., Schleidt, W.M. and Miller, B. 1978. Localization of sound producing animals using the arrival time differences of their signals at an array of microphones. Experientia, 34, 676–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McGregor, P.K. and Krebs, J.R. 1982. Song types in a population of great tits: their distribution, abundance and acquisition by individuals. Behaviour, 52, 126–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McGregor, P.K. and Krebs, J.R. 1984. Sound degradation as a distance cue in great tit (Parus major) song. Behay. Ecol. Sociobiol., 16, 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McGregor, P.K., Dabelsteen, T., Shepherd, M. and Pedersen, S.B. in press. The signal value of matched singing in great tits: evidence from interactive playback experiments. Anim. Behay.Google Scholar
  24. Michelsen, A., Andersen, B.B., Kirchner, W.H. and Lindauer, M. 1989. Honeybees can be recruited by a mechanical model of a dancing bee. Naturwissenschaften, 76, 277–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Potts, W.K. 1984. The chorus-line hypothesis of manoeuvre coordination in avian flocks. Nature, 309, 344–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Smith, D.G. and Norman, D.O. 1979. “Leader-follower” singing in red-winged blackbirds. Condor, 81, 83–84.Google Scholar
  27. Todt, D. 1968. Korrespondenz zwischen weckselsingenden Amseln. Z. Naturforschg., 23b, 1619.Google Scholar
  28. Todt, D. 1970a. Gesang und gesangliche Korrespondenz der Amsel. Naturwissenschaften, 57, 61–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Todt, D. 1970b. Gesangliche Reaktionen der Amsel (Turdus merula L.) auf ihren experimentell reproduzierten Eigengesang. Z. vergl. Physiologie, 66, 294–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Todt, D. 1981. On functions of vocal matching: effect of counter-replies on song post choice and singing. Z. Tierpsychol., 57, 73–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Watkins, W.A. and Schevill, W.E. 1972. Sound source location by arrival-times on a three-dimensional hydrophone array. Deep Sea Res., 19, 691–706.Google Scholar
  32. Wolffgram, J. and Todt, D. 1982. Pattern and time specificity in vocal responses of Blackbirds Turdus merula L. Behaviour, 81, 264–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Torben Dabelsteen
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Population BiologyUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagen øDenmark

Personalised recommendations