Skip to main content

Anatomy and Histology of the Cervix

  • Chapter
Pathology of the Female Genital Tract

Abstract

Although the cervix was recognized as an organ entity as early as 4500 B.C. during the third Egyptian Dynasty, it was Soranus, in the first century A.D., who gave the first accurate description of the cervix uteri as a separate portion of the uterus.48 The cervix (term taken from the Latin, meaning “neck”) is the most inferior portion of the uterus protruding into the upper vagina. The vagina is fused circumferentially and obliquely around the distal part of the cervix, dividing it into an upper, supravaginal and lower, vaginal portion.26 The cervix is generally cylindrical in shape, measures in the adult nulligravida 2.5 to 3.0 cm in length, and its normal position is slightly angulated downward and backward. The vaginal portion (portio vaginalis) of the cervix, also referred to as the exocervix, is delimited by the anterior and posterior fornices and has a convex elliptical surface. It is covered by a smooth, shiny squamous mucous membrane and centered by the external os, a circular (in the nulligravida) or slitlike (in the parous woman) opening (Figure 5.1). The portio may be divided into anterior and posterior lips, of which the anterior is shorter and projects lower than its posterior counterpart. The external os is interconnected with the isthmus (internal os) by the cervical canal. The canal is an elliptical, fusiform cavity, measuring in its greatest width 8 mm, and contains longitudinal mucosal ridges, the plicae palmatae (Figure 5.2). These, when hypertrophied or fused because of inflammation, may render the introduction of a uterine curette or dilator difficult because they form blind passages in the canal. The area between the endocervical and endometrial cavity is called the isthmus or lower uterine segment. The latter term is used principally for descriptive purposes during gestation and labor. The use of the terms anatomic and histologic “internal os” seems arbitrary as no convincing morphologic evidence is offered to support such a geographic subdivision of the uterus and the uterus may be divided into corpus, isthmus, and cervix. The muscular layer in the region of the isthmus is less developed than in the corpus, a feature that facilitates effacement and dilatation during labor. The blood supply of the cervix is provided by the descending branches of the uterine arteries, reaching the lateral walls along the upper margin of the paracervical ligaments (cardinal ligaments of Mackenrodt). These ligaments are the main source of fixation, support, and suspension of the organ. Another means of fixation is provided by the uterosacral ligaments, which attach the supravaginal portion of the cervix to the second through fourth sacral vertebrae. Excision of nerve fibers (denervation) within these ligaments is used to relieve intractable dysmenorrhea. The venous drainage parallels the arterial system, with communication between the cervical plexus and neck of the urinary bladder. The lymphatics of the cervix have a dual origin:36 beneath the mucosa and deep in the fibrous stroma. Both systems collect into two lateral plexuses in the region of the isthmus and give origin to four efferent channels running toward: (1) the external iliac and obturator nodes, (2) the hypogastric and common iliac nodes, (3) the sacral nodes, and (4) the nodes of the posterior wall of the urinary bladder. The innervation of the cervix is chiefly limited to the endocervix and peripheral deep portion of the exocervix.26 This distribution is responsible for the relative insensitivity to pain of the portio vaginalis. The cervical nerves derive from the pelvic autonomic system, the superior, middle, and inferior hypogastric plexuses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ashworth, C. T., Luibel, F., and Sanders, E. Epithelium of normal cervix uteri studied with electron microscopy and histochemistry. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 79: 1149, 1960.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Averette, H. E., Weinstein, G. 13., and Frost, P. Autoradio-graphic analysis of cell proliferation kinetics in human genital tissues. I. Normal cervix and vagina. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 108: 8, 1970.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chretien, F. C., Gernigon, C., David, G., and Psychoyos, A. The ultrastructure of human cervical mucus under scanning electron microscopy. Fertil. Steril. 24: 746, 1973.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Coppleson, M., Pixley, E., and Reid, B. Colposcopy. A Scientific and Practical Approach to the Cervix in Health and Disease, 1st ed. Springfield, Ill., Charles C Thomas, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Coppleson, M., and Reid, B. Preclinical Carcinoma of the Cervix Uteri, 1st ed. Oxford, Pergamon Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Danforth, D. N. The distribution and functional activity of the cervical musculature. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 68: 1261, 1954.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Danforth, D. N., Veis, A., Breen, M., Weinstein, H. G., Buckingham, J. C., and Manalo, P. The effect of pregnancy and labor in the human cervix: Changes in collagen, glycoproteins, and glycosaminoglycans. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 120: 641, 1974.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dougherty, C. M., Moore, W. R., and Cotten, N. Histologic diagnosis and clinical significance of benign lesions of the nonpregnant cervix. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 97: 683, 1962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Epperson, J. W. W., Hellman, L. M., Galvin, G. A., and Busby, T. The morphological changes in the cervix during pregnancy, including intraepithelial carcinoma. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 61: 50, 1951.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fand, S. B. The histochemistry of human cervical epithelium, in Blandau, R. J., and Maghissi, K. S., eds.: The Biology of the Cervix. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1973, pp. 103–124.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ferenczy, A., and Richart, R. M. Scanning electron microscopy of the cervical transformation zone. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 115: 151, 1973.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ferenczy, A., and Richart, R. M. Female Reproductive System. Dynamics of Scan and Transmission Microscopy, 1st ed. New York, John Wiley and Sons, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fluhman, C. F. The Cervix Uteri and Its Diseases, 1st ed. Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Foraker, A. G., and Marino, G. Glycogen-synthesizing enzymes in the uterine cervix. Obstet. Gynecol. 17: 311, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Foraker, A. G., and Wingo, W. J. Protein bound sulfhydryl and disulfide group in squamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 71: 1182, 1956.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Forsberg, J. G. Estrogen, vaginal cancer, and vaginal development. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 113: 83, 1972.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Friedrich, E. R. The normal morphology and ultrastructure of the cervix, in Blandau, R. J., and Maghissi, K. S., eds.: The Biology of the Cervix. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1973, pp. 79–102.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hackeman, M., Grubb, C., and Hill, K. R. The ultrastructure of normal squamous epithelium of the human cervix uteri. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 22: 443, 1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hamperl, H., and Kaufmann, C. The cervix uteri at different ages. Obstet. Gynecol. 14: 621, 1959.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hart, W. R., and Norris, H. J. Cervix adenocarcinoma of mesonephric type. Cancer 29: 106, 1972.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Herbst, A. L., Poskanzer, D. C., Robboy, S. J., Friedlander, L., and Scully, R. E. Prenatal exposure to stilbestrol. N. Engl. J. Med. 292: 334, 1975.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Johnson, L. D. The histopathological approach to early cervical neoplasia. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 24: 735, 1969.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Johnson, L. D. Dysplasia and carcinoma in-situ in pregnancy, in Norris, H. J., Hertig, A. T., and Abell, M. R., eds.: The Uterus, Internatl. Acad. Path. Monogr. Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins, 1973, pp. 382–412.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kolstad, P., and Staff, A. Atlas of Colposcopy, 1st ed. Baltimore, University Park Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Koss, L. G. Diagnostic Cytology and Its Histopathologic Bases, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, J. B. Lippincott, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Krantz, K. E. The anatomy of the human cervix, gross and microscopic, in Blandau, R. J., and Moghissi, K., eds.: The Biology of the Cervix. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1973, pp. 57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Llanes, A., Farre, C., Ferenczy, A., and Richart, R. M. Scanning electron microscopy of normal exfoliated squamous cervical cells. Acta Cytol. 17: 507, 1973.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mackles, A., Wolfe, S. A., and Neigus, I. Benign and malignant mesonephric lesions of the cervix. Cancer 11: 292, 1958.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. McGee, C. T., Cromer, D. W., and Greene, R. R. Mesonephric carcinoma of the cervix. Differentiation from endocervical adenocarcinoma. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 84: 358, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Meyer, R. The basis of the histological diagnosis of carcinoma with special reference to carcinoma of the cervix and similar lesions. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 73: 14, 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nicholson, G. W. Sebaceous glands in the cervix uteri. J. Pathol. Bacteriol. 22: 252, 1918.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Novak, E., Woodruff, J. D., and Novak, E. R. Probable mesonephric origin of certain female genital tumors. Am. J. Ob-stet. Gynecol. 68: 1222, 1954.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Odeblad, E. The functional structure of human cervical mucus. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 47 (Suppl. 1): 57, 1968.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Philipp, E. On the granulo-filamentary transformation of secretory granules in the mucous producing epithelium of the human endocervix. Z. Zellforsch. Mikrosk. Anat. 134: 555, 1972.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Philipp, E., and Overbeck, L. Die Ultrastuktur des Zervixepithels. Z. Geburtsh. Gynaek. 171: 159, 1969.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Reiffenstuhl, G. The Lymphatics of the Female Genital Organs, 1st ed. Philadelphia, J. B. Lippincott, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Richart, R. M. A radioautographic analysis of cellular proliferation in dysplasia and carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 86: 925, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Richart, R. M. The growth characteristics in vitro of normal epithelium, dysplasia and carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix. Cancer Res. 24: 662, 1964.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Richart, R. M. Colpomicroscopic studies of the distribution of dysplasia and carcinoma in situ on the exposed portion of the human uterine cervix. Cancer 18: 950, 1965.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Richart, R. M. Colpomicroscopic studies of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Cancer 19: 395, 1966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Richart, R. M. Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 10: 748, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Richart, R. M. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, in Sommers, C. C., ed.: Pathology Annual. New York, Appleton-CenturyCrofts, 1973, pp. 301–328.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Roth, E., and Raylor, H. B. Heterotopic cartilage in the uterus. Obstet. Gynecol. 27: 838, 1966.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Schellhas, H. F., and Heath, G. Cell renewal in the human cervix uteri. A radioautographic study of DNA, RNA, and protein synthesis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 104: 617, 1969.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Scherrick, J. C., and Vega, J. G. Congenital intramural cysts of the uterus. Obstet. Gynecol. 19: 486, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Singer, A., and Reid, B. L. Effects of the oral contraceptive steroids on the ultrastructure of human cervical mucus. J. Reprod. Fertil. 23: 249, 1970.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Staff, A., and Mattingly, R. F. Vaginal adenosis: A pre-cancerous lesion ? Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 120: 666, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Temkin, O. (Translator). Soranus’ Gynecology. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Whaley, W. G., Dauwalder, M., and Kephart, J. E. Golgi apparatus: Influence on cell surface. Science 175: 596, 1972.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Wilbanks, G. D., and Richart, R. M. The puerperal cervix, injuries and healing: A colposcopic study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 97: 1105, 1967.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Williams, A. E., Jordan, J. A., Allen, J. M., and Murphy, J. F. The surface ultrastructure of normal and metaplastic cervical epithelia and of carcinoma in situ. Cancer Res. 33: 504, 1973.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Willis, R. A. The Borderland of Embryology and Pathology, 2nd ed. Washington, D.C., Butterworth, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1977 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ferenczy, A. (1977). Anatomy and Histology of the Cervix. In: Blaustein, A. (eds) Pathology of the Female Genital Tract. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6143-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6143-6_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-6145-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-6143-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics