Advertisement

Analysis of the Resonance Reactions H3(d,n)He4 and He3(d,p)He4 in the Effective Interaction Radius Approximation

  • I. Ya. Barit
  • V. A. Sergeev
Part of the The Lebedev Physics Institute Series book series (LPIS, volume 44)

Abstract

Rather comprehensive experimental information on the reactions H3(d,n)He4 and He3(d,p)• He4 has become available in the low-energy region in which resonances are observed at Ed = 0.064 MeV* in the (d,n) reaction and at Ed = 0.255 MeV in the (d,p) reaction. It could be established that the resonances result from the channel with Jπ = 3/2+. The energy dependence of the cross sections of these reactions near the resonances (0.006 MeV <Ed < 0.250 MeV for the (d,n) reaction and 0.024 MeV <Ed < 0.350 MeV for the (d,p) reaction) has been considered in numerous papers (see, e.g., [1] and [2]).

Keywords

Energy Dependence Reaction Cross Section Resonance Parameter Energy Interval Interaction Radius 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    G. Breit, Theory of Nuclear Resonance Reactions, IL, Moscow (1961) [Russian translation].Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yu. G. Balashko, Trudy FLAN, 33:66 (1965); Yu. G. Balashko and I. Ya. Barit, Nuclear Forces and the Few-Nucleon Problem, Pergamon Press, New York (1960), p. 615.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Lane and R. Thomas, Theory of Nuclear Reactions at Low Energies, IL, Moscow (1960) [Russian translation].Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    V.A. Sergeev, FIAN Preprint No. 154 (1967); Izv. AN SSSR, ser. fiz., 32: 312 (1968).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L.D. Landau and E. M. Lifshits, Quantum Mechanics, Fizmatgiz, Moscow (1963).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A.M. Baldin, Phys. Lett., 17: 47 (1965).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. A. Tombrello, Phys. Lett., 23: 106 (1966).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Humblet and L. Rosenfeld, Nucl. Phys., 26:529 (1961); 50: 1 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. H. Ross and G. L. Shaw, Ann. Phys., 9:391 (1960); 13: 147 (1961).zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. L. Shaw and M. H. Ross, Phys. Rev., 126: 806 (1962).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. Breit and W. G. Bouricius, Phys. Rev., 75: 1029 (1949).ADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    L.D. Landau and Ya. A. Smorodinskii, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz., 14: 269 (1944).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. P. Jeukenne, Nucl. Phys., 58: 1 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. P. Kobzev, V. I. Salatskii, and S. A. Telezhnìkov, OIYaI Preprint R-2386.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. Ya. Barit
  • V. A. Sergeev

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations