Skip to main content

INR — Calibration of the Therapeutic Range

  • Chapter
The New Dimensions of Warfarin Prophylaxis
  • 177 Accesses

Abstract

The prothrombin time (PT) is the most important coagulation test. After many years of disagreement, an international system of standardisation has been accepted. Fifty years after Quick1 described the PT to detect coagulation defects, the control of oral anticoagulant therapy is still largely dependent on the test. Many modifications to the original technique have been introduced, and new methods have been developed specifically, e.g. the prothrombin and proconvertin test (P and P test),2 and the Throm-botest,3 but their application has been limited in comparison. Clinical reports of anticoagulant trials, giving no details of the PT method are still published.(e,g.4)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. J. Quick, The prothrombin in haemophilia and in obstructive jaundice, J. Biol. Chem. 109:73–74 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. A. Owren and K. Aas, The control of dicoumarol therapy and the quantitative determination of prothrombin and proconvertin, Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 3:201–208 (1951).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. P.A. Owren, Thrombotest: a new method for controlling anticoagulant therapy, Lancet ii:754–758 (1959).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. C. W. Francis, V. J. Marder, E. C. McCollister, and S. Yankoolbodi, Two step warfarin therapy, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 249:374–378 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. L. Poller and D. A. Taberner, Dosage and Control of oral anticoag- ulants, An international survey, Br. J. Haematol. 51:479 (1982).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. L. Poller, Standardisation of anticoagulant treatment: The Manchester Regional Thromboplastin Scheme, Br. Med. J. 2:565–566 (1964).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Biggs, Report on the standardisation of the one stage prothrombin time for the control of anticoagulant therapy, in: “Genetics and the interaction of blood clotting factors,” R. B. Hunter, I. S. Wright and F. Koller, eds., Thrombosis et Diathesis Haemorrhagica Supplement 17:303–327 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. Poller, The British Comparative Thromboplastin: the use of the national thromboplastin reagent for uniformity of laboratory control of oral anticoagulants and expression of results, Assoc. Clin. Pathol., Broadsheet No.71 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. B. Miale and J. W. Kent, Standardisation of the therapeutic range for oral anticoagulants based on standard reference plasmas, Am. J. Clin. Pathol., 60:453–457 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. B. L. Kirkwood, Calibration of reference thromboplastins, Thromb Haemost. (Stuttgart) 49:238–244 (1983).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Hermans, A. M. P. H. van den Besselaar, E. A. Loeliger, and E. A. van der Veld, A collaborative calibration study of reference materials for thromboplastins, Thromb. Haemost. (Stuttgart) 50:3: 712–717 (1983).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. J. M. Thomson, J. A. Tomenson, and L. Poller, The calibration of the Second Primary International Reference Preparation for Thromboplastin (Thromboplastin, human, plain, coded BCT/253), Thromb. Haemost. (Stuttgart) 52:336–342 (1984).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. J. M. Thomson, K. V. Darby, and L. Poller, Calibration of BCT/44I the ICSH Reference Preparation for Thromboplastin, Thromb. Haemost. (Stuttgart) 55:379–382 (1986).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. J. A. Tomenson, A statistician’s independent evaluation, in; “Thromboplastin calibration and oral anticoagulant control,” A. M. H. P. van den Besselaar, H. R. Gralnick, and S. M. Lewis, eds., Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Hull, J. Hirsh, R. Jay, C. Carter, C. England, M. Gent, A. G. Turpie, D. McLaughlin, P. Dodd, M. Thomas, G. Rascob, and P. Ockelford, Different intensities of anticoagulation in the long-term treatment of proximal venous thrombosis, N. Eng. J. Med. 307:1676–1681 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Koepke, Use of survey validated plasma as a means of prothrombin time standardisation, in: “Standardisation of coagulation assays,” D. Triplett, ed., College of Clinical Pathologists, Skokie, Illinois (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Sevitt and N. G. Gallagher, Prevention of venous thrombosis and pul- monary embolism in injured patients, Lancet ii:974–980 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. R. A. Mitchell, Anticoagulants in coronary heart disease, Lancet i: 257–262 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. J. Hilden, K. Iverson, F. Rasschon, and M. Schwarz, Anticoagulants in acute myocardial infarction, Lancet ii:327–331 (1961).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Medical Research Council, Assessment of short-term anticoagulant ad- ministration after cardiac infarction, Br. Med. J. 1:335–342 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sixty-Plus Reinfarction Group, A double-blind trial to assess long-term oral anticoagulant therapy in elderly patients with myocardial infarction, Lancet II:989–994 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  22. D. W. Barrit and S. C. Jordan, Anticoagulant drugs in the treatment of thromboembolism, Lancet i:1309–13l2 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. Hull, T. Delmore, E. Genton, J. Hirsh, M. Gent, D. Sackett, D. McLoughlin, and P. Armstrong, Warfarin sodium versus low-dose heparin in the long-term treatment of venous thrombosis, N. Eng. J. Med. 301:855–858 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. R. Hull, T. Delmore, C. Carter, J. Hirst, E. Genton, M. Gent, J. Turpie, and D. McLoughlin, Adjusted subcutaneous heparin versus warfarin sodium in the long-term treatment of venous thrombosis, N. Eng. J. Med. 306:189–194 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. S. Sevitt and D. Innés, Prothrombin time and Thrombotest in injured patients on prophylactic anticoagulant therapy, Lancet i: 124–130 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. D. A. Taberner, L. Poller, R. W. Burslem, and J. B. Jones, Oral anti- coagulants controlled by British Comparative Thromboplastin versus low-dose heparin prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis, Br. Med. J. 1:272–274 (1978).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Poller, L. (1987). INR — Calibration of the Therapeutic Range. In: Wessler, S., Becker, C.G., Nemerson, Y. (eds) The New Dimensions of Warfarin Prophylaxis. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5985-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5985-3_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-5987-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-5985-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics