Abstract
This paper discusses the planning of multisentential text by computer. In order to construct coherent paragraphs, we have been using relations from Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST) operationalized as plans. The paper first describes, in some detail, the current method of planning a paragraph using operationalized RST relation/plans. It then makes two points that illustrate why RST relation/plans are an ideal tool for planning paragraphs. First, these relation/plans can be shown to combine the best features of paragraph-sized schemas and clause-sized planning rules under a top-down planning regime in a way which affords much flexibility to the user. Second, RST relation/plans can support both standard top-down planning and open-ended conversation-like behavior; a small difference in treatment gives rise to either paradigm.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Appelt, D.E., 1981. Planning Natural Language Utterances to Satisfy Multiple Goals. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.
Appelt, D.E., 1985. Planning English Sentences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Arens, Y., Miller, L., Shapiro, S.C. and Sondheimer, N.K., 1988. Automatic Construction of User-Interface Displays. Proceedings of the 7th AAAI Conference, St. Paul (808–813).
Cohen, P.R. and Levesque, H.J., 1985. Speech Acts and Rationality. Proceedings of the 23rd ACL Conference, Chicago (49–59).
Conklin, E.J. and McDonald, D.D., 1982. Salience: The Key to the Selection Problem in Natural Language Generation. Proceedings of the 20th ACL Conference, Toronto (129–135).
Hovy, E.H., 1988a. Planning Coherent Multisentential Text. Proceedings of the 26th ACL Conference, Buffalo (163–169).
Hovy, E.H., 1988b. On the Study of Text Planning and Realization. Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Text Planning and Realization, St. Paul (17–29).
Hovy, E.H. and McCoy, K.F., 1989. Focusing your RST: A step toward generating coherent multisentential text. Proceedings of the 11th Cognitive Science Society Conference, Ann Arbor (667–674).
Kaczmarek, T.S., Bates, R. and Robins, G., 1986. Recent Developments in NIKL. Proceedings of the 5th AAAI Conference, Philadelphia (978–985).
Mann, W.C., 1983. An Overview of the Nigel Text Generation Grammar. USC/Information Sciences Institute Research Report RR-83–113.
Mann, W.C., 1988. Text Generation: The Problem of Text Structure. In McDonald, D.D. and Bole, L. (eds), Natural Language Generation Systems,New York: Springer Verlag (47–68). Also USC/Information Sciences Institute Research Report RR-87–181.
Mann, W.C. and Matthiessen, C.M.I.M., 1983. Nigel: A Systemic Grammar for Text Generation. USC/Information Sciences Institute Research Report RR-83–105.
Mann, W.C. and Thompson, S.A., 1983. Relational Propositions in Discourse. USC/Information Sciences Institute Research Report RR-83–115.
Mann, W.C. and Thompson, S.A., 1987. Rhetorical Structure Theory: Description and Construction of Text Structures. In Kempen, G. (ed), Natural Language Generation: New Results in Artificial Intelligence, Psychology, and Linguistics Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers (85–95). Also USC/Information Sciences Institute Research Report RR-86–174.
Matthiessen, C.M.I.M., 1984. Systemic Grammar in Computation: The Nigel Case. USC/Information Sciences Institute Research Report RR-84–121.
McCoy, K.F., 1985. Correcting Object-Related Misconceptions. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
McCoy, K.R. and Cheng, J., 1990. Focus of Attention: Constraining what can be said next. In Natural Language Generation in Artificial Intelligence and Computational Linguistics, (this volume). Paris, Swartout, Mann (Eds). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.
McKeown, K.R., 1982. Generating Natural Language Text in Response to Questions about Database Queries. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Moore, J.D. and Paris, C.L., 1989. Planning Text for Advisory Dialogues. Proceedings of the 27th ACL Conference, Vancouver (203–211).
Moore, J.D. and Swartout, W.R., 1990. A Reactive Approach to Explanation: Taking the User’s Feedback into Account. In Natural Language Generation in Artificial Intelligence and Computational Linguistics, (this volume). Paris, Swartout, Mann (Eds). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.
Paris, C.L., 1987. The Use of Explicit User Models in Text Generation: Tailoring to a User’s Level of Expertise. Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University. To be published by Frances Pinter Publishers in the “Communication in Artificial intelligence” series, Steiner and Fawcett (Eds )
Paris, C.L., 1990. Generation and Explanation: Building an Explanation Facility for the Explainable Expert Systems Framework. In Natural Language Generation in Artificial Intelligence and Computational Linguistics, (this volume). Paris, Swartout, Mann (Eds). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.
Sacerdoti, E., 1977. A Structure for Plans and Behavior. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hovy, E.H. (1991). Approaches to the Planning of Coherent Text. In: Paris, C.L., Swartout, W.R., Mann, W.C. (eds) Natural Language Generation in Artificial Intelligence and Computational Linguistics. The Kluwer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science, vol 119. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5945-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5945-7_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5125-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-5945-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive