Referent Grammar In Text Generation
A text may be seen as the result of input from the external world and human internal aspects on it. The paper shows how the same event — a submarine following a trawler — may give rise to different types (genres) of text, e.g., a report on the facts, an evaluation of the facts, a summary of the most important features against the background of previous events, or a mixture of some or all of these.
As is well known, it is difficult to teach a computer how to generate interesting and varying text including more abstract, evaluative and summarizing comments. The paper shows how different predicates, e.g., be, go, sail, follow, attack give information of varying interest and how the computer may calculate the news value of an event on the basis of the amount of interest of the predicates and the objects involved. The bulk of the paper demonstrates how Referent Grammar (RG) — a generalized phrase structure grammar with built-in referents — offers a convenient way of keeping track of both the sentence and the discourse referents.
KeywordsNoun Phrase Relative Clause Text Generation Discourse Referent Relative Pronoun
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Badler, N.I. “Temporal scene analysis: conceptual descriptions of object movements.” Technical Report No 80. University of Toronto, 1975.Google Scholar
- Davey, A. Discourse production: A computer model of some aspects of a speaker. Edinburgh University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
- Fornell, J. and B. Sigurd, “Commentator–ett mikrodatorbaserat forskningsredskap foer lingvister.” Praktisk Lingvistik 8. Dept of Linguistics Lund. 1983.Google Scholar
- Gawronska-Werngren, B. “Tracking discourse referents for machine translation from Russian.” Paper presented at Nordiske Datalingvistikdage 1989, Reykjavik.Google Scholar
- Gazdar, G., Klein, E., Pullum, G. and Sag, I. Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. Oxford ( 1985: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
- Karttunen,L. “Discourse referents,” In: Syntax and Semantics, vol 7. J. Mc-Cawley (ed), New York ( 1976: Academic Press).Google Scholar
- Kempen, G. “Language generation systems.” In: Computational linguistics. An International handbook on computer oriented language research and applications. Batori et al. (eds), Berlin/New York (1986:de Gruyter).Google Scholar
- Kempen, G. (ed) Natural Language Generation: New results in Artificial Intelligence, Psychology and Linguistics. Dortdrecht ( 1987: Martinus Nijhoff ).Google Scholar
- Nilsson, M., J.Eriksson, J. Gustafsson and O.Joensson. “Commentator a TurboPascal implementation.” (Dept of Linguistics, Lund,1988).Google Scholar
- Okada, N. Conceptual taxonomy of Japanese verbs for understanding natural language and picture patterns. In: Proc. of the eigth International conference on computational linguistics, Tokyo 1980.Google Scholar
- Sigurd, B. (1987) “Referent Grammar ( RG ): A Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar with built-in referents.” Studia Linguistica 41: 2.Google Scholar
- Sigurd, B. (1988a) “SWETRA–a multilingual computer translation system using referent grammar.” In: Proc. of the International Workshop “New Directions in Automatic Translations, Schubert, C. (ed) Budapest 1988. ( Amsterdam: Foris ).Google Scholar
- Sigurd, B. and B. “Gawronska-Werngren, The Potential of Swetra–A Multi-language MT-system.” Computers and Translation 3 (1989), 237–250.Google Scholar
- Webber, B. So what can we talk about now? In: Computational models of discourse new. Brady, M. and C. Berwick (eds), Cambridge:Mass (1983 MIT Press).Google Scholar