Analysis of Nanoindentation Test Data

  • Anthony C. Fischer-Cripps
Part of the Mechanical Engineering Series book series (MES)


As described in Chapter 2, estimations of both elastic modulus and hardness of the specimen material in a nanoindentation test are obtained from load versus penetration measurements. Rather than a direct measurement of the size of residual impressions, contact areas are instead calculated from depth measurements together with a knowledge of the actual shape of the indenter. For this reason, nanoindentation testing is sometimes referred to as depth-sensing indentation testing. In this chapter, methods of the analysis of load-displacement data that are used to compute hardness and modulus of test specimens are presented in detail. It is an appropriate introduction to first consider the case of a cylindrical punch indenter — even though this type of indenter is rarely used for this type of testing, its response illustrates and introduces the theory for the more complicated cases of spherical and pyramidal indenters.


Contact Stiffness Elastic Recovery Specimen Material Spherical Indenter Berkovich Indenter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    A.C. Fischer-Cripps, Introduction to Contact Mechanics, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2000.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G.M. Pharr, W.C. Oliver, and F.R. Brotzen, “On the generality of the relationship among contact stiffness, contact area, and the elastic modulus during indentation,” J. Mater. Res. 7 3, 1992, pp. 613–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M.F. Doemer and W.D. Nix, “A method for interpreting the data from depth-sensing indentation instruments,” J. Mater. Res. 1 4, 1986, pp. 601–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    W.C. Oliver and G.M. Pharr, “An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments,” J. Mater. Res. 7 4, 1992, pp. 1564–1583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J.S. Field and M.V. Swain, “A simple predictive model for spherical indentation,” J. Mater. Res. 8 2, 1993, pp. 297–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    E.S. Berkovich, “Three-faceted diamond pyramid for micro-hardness testing,” Ind. Diamond Rev. 11 127, 1951, pp. 129–133.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    I.N. Sneddon, “Boussinesq’s problem for a rigid cone,” Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 44, 1948, pp. 492–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.Woirgard and J-C. Dargenton, “An alternative method for penetration depth determination in nanoindentation measurements,” J. Mater. Res. 12 9, 1997, pp. 24552458.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. Sawa and K. Tanaka, “Simplified method for analyzing nanoindentation data and evaluating performance of nanoindentation instruments,” J. Mater. Res. 16 11, 2001, pp. 3084–3096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Bolshakov and G.M. Pharr, “Understanding nanoindentation unloading curves,” J. Mater. Res. 17 10, 2002, pp. 2660–2671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R.B. King, “Elastic analysis of some punch problems for a layered medium,” Int. J. Solids Structures, 23 12, 1987, pp. 1657–1664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D.B. Marshall and B.R. Lawn, “Indentation of Brittle Materials,” Microindentation Techniques in Materials Science and Engineering, ASTM STP 889, P.J. Blau and B.R. Lawn, Eds. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1986, pp. 26–46.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    L. Riester, T.J. Bell, and A.C. Fischer-Cripps, “Analysis of depth-sensing indentation tests with a Knoop indenter,” J. Mater. Res. 16 6, 2001, pp. 1660–1667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    D.B. Marshall, T. Noma, and A.G. Evans, “A simple method for determining elastic-modulus-to-hardness ratios using Knoop indentation measurements,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 65, 1980, pp. C175 - C176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    I.N. Sneddon, “The relation between load and penetration in the axisymmetric Boussinesq problem for a punch of arbitrary profile”, Int. J. Eng. Sci. 3, 1965, pp. 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    A.C. Fischer-Cripps, “Elastic recovery and reloading of hardness impressions with a conical indenter,” Mat. Res. Symp. Proc. 750, 2003, pp. Y6.9.1-Y6. 9. 6.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    ISO 14577, “Metallic materials — Instrumented indentation test for hardness and materials parameters.” ISO Central Secretariat, 1 rue de Varembé, 1211 Geneva 20 Switzerland.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M.Kh. Shorshorov, S.I. Bulychev, and V.O. Alekhin, “Work of plastic and elastic deformation during indenter indentation,” Soy. Phys. Dokl. 26 8, 1981, pp. 769–771.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Sakai, “Energy principle of the indentation-induced inelastic surface deformationGoogle Scholar
  20. and hardness of brittle materials,“ Acta. Metal. Mater. 41 6, 1993, pp. 1751–1758.Google Scholar
  21. 20.
    J B Quinn and G.D. Quinn, “Indentation brittleness: a fresh approach,” J. Mat. Sci.Google Scholar
  22. 32.
    pp. 4331–4346.Google Scholar
  23. 21.
    T.-Y. Zhang and W.-H. Xu, “Surface effects on nanoindentation,” J. Mater. Res. 17 7, 2002, pp. 1715–1720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 22.
    B.N. Lucas, W.C. Oliver, and J.E. Swindeman, “The dynamics of frequency specific, depth sensing indentation testing,” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 522, 1998, pp. 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 23.
    D. Lorenz, W. Fränzel, M. Einax, P. Grau, and G. Berg, “Determination of the elastic properties of glasses and polymers exploiting the resonant characteristic of depthsensing indentation tests,” J. Mater, Res. 16 6, 2001, pp. 1776–1783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 24.
    D.L. Joslin and W.C. Oliver, “A new method for analyzing data from continuous depth-sensing microindentation tests,” J. Mater. Res. 5 1, 1990, pp. 123–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 25.
    S.V. Hainsworth, H.W. Chandler, and T.F. Page, “Analysis of nanoindentation load-displacement loading curves,” J. Mater. Res. 11 8, 1996, pp. 1987–1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 26.
    T.A. Venkatesh, K.J. Van Vliet, A.E. Giannakopolous, and S. Suresh, “Determination of elasto-plastic properties by instrumented sharp indentation: Guidelines for property extraction,” Scripta Mater. 42, 2000, pp. 833–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 27.
    W.W. Gerberich, W. Yu, D. Kramer, A. Strojny, D. Bahr, E. Lilleodden, and J. Nelson, “Elastic loading and elastoplastic unloading from nanometer level indentations for modulus determinations,” J. Mater. Res. 13 2, 1998, pp. 421–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 28.
    T.F. Page, G.M. Pharr, J.C. Hay, W.C. Oliver, B.N. Lucas, E. Herbert, and L. Ri-ester, “Nanoindentation characterization of coated systems: P:S2 — a new approach using the continuous stiffness technique,” Mat. Res. Symp. Proc. 522, 1998, pp. 5364.Google Scholar
  31. 29.
    D.S. Stone, “Elastic rebound between an indenter and a layered specimen: Part 1. Model,” J. Mater. Res. 13 11, 1998, pp. 3207–3213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 30.
    K.B. Yoder, D.S. Stone, R.A. Hoffman, and J.C. Lin, “Elastic rebound between an indenter and a layered specimen: Part II. Using contact stiffness to help ensure reliability of nanoindentation measurements,” J. Mater. Res. 13 11, 1998, pp. 32143220.Google Scholar
  33. 31.
    W.C. Oliver, “Alternative technique for analyzing instrumented indentation data,” J. Mater. Res. 16 11, 2001, pp. 3202–3206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 32.
    J. Malzbender and G. de With, “Indentation load-displacement curve, plastic deformation, and energy,” J. Mater. Res. 17 2, 2002, pp. 502–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 33.
    M. Sakai and Y, Nakano, Nakano, “Elastoplastic load-depth hysteresis in pyramidal indentation,” J. Mater. Res. 17 8, 2002, pp. 2161–2173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 34.
    K. Zeng and C.-h Chiu, “An analysis of load-penetration curves from instrumented indentation,” Acta Mater. 49, 2001, pp. 3539–3551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 35.
    K. Zeng and L. Shen, “A new analysis of nanoindentation load-displacement curves,” Phil. Mag. A 82 10, 2002, pp. 2223–2229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 36.
    N.X. Randall and C. Julia-Schmutz, “Evolution of contact area and pile-up during the nanoindentation of soft coatings on hard substrates,” Mat. Res. Symp. Proc. Vol. 522, 1998, pp. 21–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 37.
    N.X. Randall, “Direct measurement of residual contact area and volume during the nanoindentation of coated materials as an alternative method of calculating hardness,” Phil. Mag. A 82, 10, 2002, pp. 1883–1892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony C. Fischer-Cripps
    • 1
  1. 1.CSIROLindfieldAustralia

Personalised recommendations