Skip to main content
Book cover

Muscle Foods pp 333–360Cite as

Sensory Methods to Evaluate Muscle Foods

  • Chapter

Abstract

Muscle foods have properties that are related to the five senses of taste, smell, sight, feel, and sound. The four basic tastes of salty, sweet, bitter, and sour can be readily identified in different muscle foods. Further processed muscle foods, such as frankfurters or summer sausage, usually have salty or sweet tastes. Smell is a very important sensory property, as the detection of aromatics and/or odors by the olfactory nerve comprises the major components of muscle food flavor. The fishy flavor in intensely flavored fish species is an aromatic detected by the olfactory nerve. Texture or feel of food influences perceptions of acceptability. The tenderness of muscle foods has been shown to affect consumer acceptability just as the detection of mouth-coating or a residual substance, usually fat, in the mouth and throat after the consumption of high-fat meat products can influence human perception of acceptability or unacceptability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Selected References

  • AMSA. 1978. Guidelines of Cookery and Sensory Evaluation of Meat. American Meat Science Association, National Live Stock and Meat Board, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM. 1978. Compilation of odor and taste threshold values data. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, W.S. 1979. To know with the nose: Keys to odor identification. Science 203: 467.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Civille, G.V. 1991. Food quality: Consumer acceptance and sensory attributes. J. Food Qual. 14: 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Civille, G.V., A.M. Munoz, and E. Chambers, IV. 1989. Consumer Testing: A Four Day Intensive Workshop. Sensory Spectrum, East Hanover, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, H.R., R. Moen, and M.S. Stanfield. 1978. Training and testing of judges for sensory analysis of meat quality. Food Technol. 32: 48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desor, J.A. and G.K. Beauchamp. 1974. The human capacity to transmit olfactory information. Percep. Psychophysiol. 16: 551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froning G.W., A.J. Maurer, K.K. Hale, and A.F. Carlin. 1978. Sensory properties of poultry meat. The Agriculture Experimental Station, University of Nebraska, Lincoln. North Central Regional Research Publ. No. 254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gower, J.C. 1975. Generalised Procrustes Analysis. Psychometrika 40: 33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen, P.B. and G.V. Civille. 1986. A standardized lexicon of meat WOF descriptors. J. Sensory Studies 1: 99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen, P., G.V. Civille, and J.R. Vercellotti. 1987. A lexicon of pond-raised catfish flavor descriptors. J. Sensory Studies 2: 85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, Harry. 1991. The sense of smell in food quality and sensory evaluation. J. Food Qual. 14: 33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, B.G. 1987. Development of chicken flavor descriptive attribute terms aided by multivariate statistical procedures. J. Sensory Studies 2: 55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meilgaard, M., G.V. Civille, and B.T. Carr. 1991. Sensory Evaluation Techniques, Vol 3. CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munoz, A.M., G.V. Civille, and B.T. Can’. 1992. Sensory Evaluation in Quality Control. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, H. and J.L. Sidel. 1993. Sensory Evaluation Practices, 2nd ed. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, A.E. and F. Tally. 1968. Organoleptic identification of roasted beef, veal, lamb and pork as affected by fat. J. Food Sci. 33: 219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller, M., M.W. Galgam, and M. Jacobson. 1962. Flavor and tenderness of lamb as influenced by agriculture. J. Anim. Sci. 21: 927.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A.A. and G.M. Arnold. 1984. A new approach to sensory analysis of foods and beverages. In: Progress in Flavour Research, Proc. 4th Weurman Flavour Research Symp. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Miller, R.K. (1994). Sensory Methods to Evaluate Muscle Foods. In: Kinsman, D.M., Kotula, A.W., Breidenstein, B.C. (eds) Muscle Foods. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5933-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5933-4_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-5935-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-5933-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics