On the Impact of Signal-Level-Based Power Control on Terminal Battery Duration

  • Marco Chiani
  • Andrea Conti
  • Roberto Verdone


Power Control (PC) techniques have been studied for years with the aim of reducing interference and allowing efficient battery energy management. Among PC algorithms, those based on the Signal Level (not on Cochannel Interference) show good characteristics in terms of network stability and provide optimum downlink performance when a Half Compensation scheme is used instead of a Full Compensation algorithm.

This work is concerned with Partial (including the Full and Half cases) Compensation Signal-Level-Based PC algorithms and their impact on battery duration of mobile terminals, i.e. the uplink is investigated. A TDMA-based cellular system is considered. The effect of a slow PC, i.e., following only slow channel fluctuations, on the average transmitted power of mobile terminals is evaluated through a completely analytical model; both ideal and non-ideal PC are considered.

Starting from suitable requirements on radio coverage, we show that a Half Compensation PC scheme is often a good choice for extending terminal battery life (thus also reducing health risks).


Transmitted Power Power Control Outage Probability Path Loss Coverage Probability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Energy Management in Personal Communications and Mobile Computing“, Special Issue, IEEE Pers. Comm., Vol. 5, No. 3, June 1998.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    J. Zander, “Performance of Optimum Transmitter Power Control in Cellular Radio Systems”, IEEE Trans. on Veh. Technol., Feb. 1992, VT-41, N. 1, pp. 57–62.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    J. Zander, ‘Distributed Cochannel Interference Control in Cellular Radio Systems“, IEEE Trans. on Veh. Technol., Aug. 1992, VT-41, N. 3, pp. 305–311.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    J. F. Whitehead, “Signal-Level-Based Dynamic Power Control for Co-channel Interference Management”, proc. of IEEE VTC93, Secaucus, May 1993.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    R. Verdone, A. Zanella, “On the Optimization of Fully Distributed Power Control Techniques in Cellular Radio Systems”, to appear on IEEE Trans. on Veh. Technol..Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    E. Lachat, J.-F. Wagen, J. Li Salina, M. Schilling, “Analysis of Downlink Power Control in a GSM System”, IEEE Veh. Technol. Conf., pp. 2306–2310, Ottawa, Canada, 18–21 May, 1998.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    M. Chiani, A. Conti and O. Andrisano, “Up-link Analytical Outage Evaluation for Slow Frequency Hopping Mobile Radio Systems”, IEEE Int. Conf. Comm. (ICC’99), Vancouver, CA, June 1999.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    W. C. Jakes, “Microwave Mobile Communications”, John Wiley and Sons, 1974.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    C. C. Lee, R. Steele “Signal-to-Interference Calculations for Modern TDMA Cellular Communication Systems”, IEE Proc.-Commun., vol. 142, no. 1, pp. 21–30, February 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marco Chiani
    • 1
  • Andrea Conti
    • 1
  • Roberto Verdone
    • 2
  1. 1.DEISUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly
  2. 2.CSITE-CNRUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations