Multi-Sensory Feedback Therapy for Oculomotor Dysfunction

  • Kenneth J. Ciuffreda
  • Barry Tannen
  • Daniella Rutner
Part of the Topics in Biomedical Engineering International Book Series book series (TOBE)

Abstract

Biofeedback refers to the process of gaining voluntary control over some bodily function by immediate use of information regarding its physiological state. Thus, the individual is provided immediate information from biological processes normally beyond their awareness, thereby facilitating the regulation of these same functions (Brown, 1977; Wolf, 2001). The experimental applications of this technique have continued to grow, and the method has been used to control such disparate physiological processes as blood pressure, heart rate, muscle tension, brain wave activity, galvanic skin response, intestinal motility, and skin temperature (Fuller, 1978; Lee et al, 1977; Spilker, 1991). Biofeedback training has been used in the medical treatment of hypertension, cardiac arrhythmias, neuromuscular dysfunction, circulatory insufficiency, migraine, autonomic dysfunction, and chronic anxiety. The general biofeedback therapy paradigm is three-fold: (1) to provide information related to system variation/state that the individual learns to control, (2) to withdraw this information gradually, once control is well-learned, and (3) to provide occasional “reinforcement” using the prior auxiliary feedback information to maintain the newly-learned ability.

Keywords

Visual Feedback Auditory Feedback Reading Rate Tactile Feedback Biofeedback Therapy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abadi, R.V., 1979, Visual performance with contact lenses and congenital idiopathic nystagmus, Brit. J. PhysioL Opt. 33: 32–37.Google Scholar
  2. Abadi, RV., Carden, C., and Simpson, J., 1979, Controlling abnormal eye movements, Vis. Res. 19: 961–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abadi, RV., Carden, C., and Simpson, J., 1980, A new treatment for congenital nystagmus, Brit. J. OphthaL 64: 2–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Abadi, RV., Carden, C., and Simpson, J., 1981, Listening for eye movements, Ophthal. PhysioL Opt. 1: 19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Abrams, B.S., Correcting nystagmus with conical lenses, 1955, Optom. Fildy. 46: 809–812Google Scholar
  6. Abplanalp, P., and Bedell, H., 1983, Biofeedback therapy in rehabilitative optometry, The Rehab. Optom. J. 1: 11–14.Google Scholar
  7. Abplanalp, P., and Bedell, H., 1987, Visual improvement in an albinotic patient with alternation of congenital nystagmus, Amer. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 64: 94–951.Google Scholar
  8. Afanador, A.J., 1982, Auditory biofeedback and intermittent exotropia, J. Amer. Optom. Assoc. 53: 481–483.Google Scholar
  9. Allio, K., Kujala, T., Paavilainen, P., Sununala, H., Naatanen, R, 1993, Auditory processing visual brain areas of the early blind: evidence from event-related potentials, Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 86: 418–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Allen, E.D., and Davies, P.D., 1983, Role of contact lenses in the management of congenital nystagmus. Brit. J Ophthal. 67: 834–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blekher, T., Yamada, T., Yee, R.D., and Abel, L.A., 1998, Effects of acupuncture on foveation characteristics in congenital nystagmus, Brit. J. OphthaL 82: 115–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown, B., 1977, Stress and the Art of Biofeedback, Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Buche!, C., Price, C., Frackowiak, R.S.J., and Friston, K., 1998, Different activation patterns in the visual cortex of late and congenitally blind subjects, Brain, 121: 409–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Caloroso, E.E., and Rouse, M.W., 1993, Clinical Management of Strabismus, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston.Google Scholar
  15. Camiichael L., and Dearborn, W.F., 1947, Reading and Visual Fatigue, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.Google Scholar
  16. Ciuffreda, K.J., The scientific basis for and efficacy of optometric vision therapy in non-strabismic accommodative and vergence disorders, Optometry,in press.Google Scholar
  17. Ciuffreda, K.J., and Hung, G.K., 1988, Eye movement auditory biofeedback; “hearing” abnormal eye movements, Med. Electron., December, pp. 66–70.Google Scholar
  18. Ciuffreda, K.J., and Goldrich, S.G., 1983, Oculomotor biofeedback therapy, Internat. Rehab. Med. 5: 111–117.Google Scholar
  19. Ciuffreda, K.J., Goldrich, S., and Neary, C., 1980, Auditory biofeedback as a potentially important new tool in the treatment of nystagmus, Amer. Optom. Assoc. 51: 615–617.Google Scholar
  20. Ciuffreda, K.J., Goldrich, S.G., and Neary, C., 1982a, Control of nystagmus using eye movement auditory biofeedback, in Functional Basis of Ocular Motility Disorders, Lennerstrand, G. et al eds, Pergamon Press, New York, pp. 147–150.Google Scholar
  21. Ciuffieda, K.J., Goldrich, S.G., and Neary, C., 1982b, Use of eye movement auditory biofeedback in the control of nystagmus, Amer. J Optom. Physiol. Opt. 59: 396–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ciuffreda, K.J., Levi, D.M., and Selenow, A., 1991, Amblyopia: Basic and Clinical Aspects, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston.Google Scholar
  23. Ciuffreda, K.J., and Tannen, B., 1995, Eye Movement Basics for the Clinician, Mosby Yearbook, St. Louis.Google Scholar
  24. Ciuffreda, K.J., and Tannen, B., 1999, Training of nystagmus: a multi-sensory approach, J. Behay. Optom. 10: 63–66.Google Scholar
  25. Cohen, L.G., Celnik, P., Pascual-Leone, A. et al, 1997, Functional relevance of cross-modal plasticity in blind humans, Nature, 389: 180–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Critchley, H.D., Melmed, R.N., Featherstone, E., Mathias, C.J., and Dolan, RI, 2001, Brain activity during biofeedback relaxation: a functional neuroimaging investigation, Brain, 124: 1003–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dell ‘Osso, L.F., Leigh, R.J., and Daroff, R.B., 1990, Suppression of congenital nystagmus by cutaneous stimulation, Neuro-ophthat 11: 173–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dell ‘Osso, L.F., Traccis, S., Abel, L.A., and Erzurum, S.I., 1988, Contact lenses and congenital nystagmus, Clin. Vision Sci. 3: 229–232.Google Scholar
  29. Fayos, B., and Ciuffreda, K.J., 1998, Oculomotor auditory biofeedback training to improve reading efficiency, J. Behay. Optom. 9: 143–152.Google Scholar
  30. Fletcher, J., 1993, Eye movement rhythmicity and reading comprehension, J Learn. Disab. 26: 683–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Flom, M.C., Kirschen, D.G., and Bedell, H.E., 1978, Control of unsteady, eccentric fixation inamblyopic eyes by auditory biofeedback of eye position, Invest. Ophthal Vis. Sci., 19: 1371–1381Google Scholar
  32. Fuller, G., 1978, Current status of biofeedback in clinical practice, Amer. Psycho!. 33: 39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Goldrich, S.G., 1982, Oculomotor biofeedback therapy for exotropia, Amer. J Optom. Physiol. Opt. 59: 306–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hall, E.C., and Ciuffreda, K.J., Eccentric viewing training in macular disease using ocular motor biofeedback, J Behay. Optom.,in press.Google Scholar
  35. Hall, E.C., and Ciuffreda, K.J., Submitted, Fixational ocular motor control is plastic despite visual deprivation.Google Scholar
  36. Halperin, E., and Yolton, RL., 1986, Ophthalmic applications of biofeedback, Amer. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 63: 985–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Healy, E., 1952, Nystagmus treated by orthoptics, Amer. J. Orthopt. 2: 53–55.Google Scholar
  38. Healy, E., 1962, Nystagmus treated by orthoptics: a second report, Amer. J. Orthopt. 12: 89–91.Google Scholar
  39. Hirons, R., and Yoton, R.L., 1978, Biofeedback treatment of strabismus: case studies, J. Amer. Optom. Assoc. 49: 875–882.Google Scholar
  40. Hughes, H.C., Nelson, M.D., and Aronchick, D.M., 1998, Spatial characteristics of visual-auditory summation in human sacr.acles, Vision Res. 38: 3955–3963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hung, G.K., Ciufeda, K.J., Carley, CA., Fang, P., and Menditto, S., 1988, Auditory biofeedback to control vertical and horizontal eye movements in the dark, Invest. Ophthal. Vis. Sci., 29: 1860–1865.Google Scholar
  42. Ishikawa, S., Ozawa, H., and Fujiyama, Y., 1987, Treatment of nystagmus by acupuncture, Proc. 6th Annual Meeting of the International Neuro-Ophthalmology Society, Hakone, Japan, pp. 227–232.Google Scholar
  43. Ishikawa, S., Tanakadate, A., Nabatame, K., and Ishu, M., 1985, Biofeedback treatment of congenital nystagmus, Neuro-opluhalmol. Jpn. 2: 58–64.Google Scholar
  44. Inverso, M., and Larsen, T., 1981, Biofeedback-enhanced vision training for strabismus, O.D. thesis, Pacific University, College of Optometry, Forest Grove, OR.Google Scholar
  45. Kapadia, M.K., Gilbert, CD., and Westheimer, G., 1994, A quantitative measure for short-term cortical plasticity in human vision, J. Neurosci., 14: 451–457.Google Scholar
  46. Kirschen, D.G., 1977, Visual acuity and oculomotor control in amblyopia, Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. Calif. ( Berkeley ), School of Optometry.Google Scholar
  47. Kirschen, D.G., 1983, Auditory biofeedback in the control of congenital nystagmus, Amer. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 60: 364–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kirschen, D.G., 1991, Biofeedback therapy for amblyopia, in Problems in Optometry: Amblyopia, Vol. 3, No. 2, R. London ed., Lippincott, J.B., Philadelphia, pp. 369–375Google Scholar
  49. Kujala, T., Alho, K., Paavilainen, P., Summala, H., and Naatanen, R., 1992, Neural plasticity in processing of sound localization by the early blind: an event-related potential study, Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 84: 469–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lee, RM., Baldwin, S.E., and Lee, J.A., 1977, Clinical uses of biofeedback: a review of recent research, Henry Ford Hasp. Med. J 25: 99–118.Google Scholar
  51. Letoumeau, J.E., 1976, Application of biofeedback and behavior modification techniques in visual training, Amer. J Optom. Physiol. Opt. 53: 187–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Letoumeau, J.E., and Giroux, R, 1984, Using biofeedback in an exotropic aphake, J. Amer. Optoin. Assoc. 55: 909–910.Google Scholar
  53. Letoumeau, J.E., and Ludlam, W.M., 1976, Biofeedback reinforcement in the training of limitation of gaze, Amer. J Optom. Physiol. Opt. 53: 672–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Leung, V., Wick, B., and Bedell, H.E., 1996, Multifaceted treatment of congenital nystagmus: a report of 6 cases, Optom. Vis. ScL 73: 114–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Matsubayashi, K., Fukushima, M., and Tabuchi, A., 1992, Application of soft contact lenses for children with nystagmus, Neuro-ophthalmot 12: 47–52.Google Scholar
  56. McFarland, D.J., 1971, Feedback Mechanisms in Animal Behavior, Academic Press, New York Mezawa, M., Ishikawa, S., and Ukai, K., 1990, Changes in wavefomi of congenital nystagmus associated with biofeedback treatment, Brit. J. Ophthal. 74: 472–476.Google Scholar
  57. Mawr’, J.H., 1966, Biological Control Systems Analysis, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  58. Munk, M.H., Roelfsema, P.R., Konig, P., Engel, A.K., and Singer, W., 1996, Role of reticular activation in the modulation of intracortical synchronization, Science, 272: 271–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Murthy, V.N., and Fetz, E.E., 1992, Coherent 25- to 35-Hz oscillations in the sensorimotor cortex of awake behaving monkeys, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89: 5670–5674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ordonez, X.P., and Ciuffreda, K.J., 1997, Reading eye movements in patients with nystagmus and proposed therapeutic paradigms, J Behay. Optom. 8: 99–103.Google Scholar
  61. Ozawa, H., Fujiyama, Y., and Ishikawa, S., 1983, The effect of vibrations on intensity of nystagmus and body movement, Agressologie, 24: 229–230.Google Scholar
  62. Pearlman, C.A., 1976, A case study, J. Amer. Optom. Assoc. 47: 396–398.Google Scholar
  63. Robinson, G.M., 1977, Rhythmic organization in speech processing, J Esp. Psych: Human Percept. Perform. 3: 83–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rotberg, M.H., and Surwit, RS., 1981, Biofeedback techniques in the treatment of visual and ophthalmologic disorders, Biofeed. Self-Regul. 6: 375–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rydberg, A., Han, Y., and Ciuffreda, K.J., 1999, Eye movement auditory biofeedback therapy for patients with nystagmus, Trans. 25th Meeting of the European Strabismological Assoc., Jerusalem, Israel, pp. 330–334.Google Scholar
  66. Scheiman, M.M., Pet, E., and Libassi, D., 1983, Auditory biofeedback used to enhance convergence insufficiency, J. Amer. Optom. Assoc. 54: 1001–1003.Google Scholar
  67. Schor, C.M. and Hallmark, W., 1978, Slow control of eye position in strabismic amblyopie, Invest. Ophthal. Vis. Sci., 17: 577–581.Google Scholar
  68. Shelhamer, M., Merfield, D.M., and Mendoza, J.C., 1994, Vergence can be controlled by audio feedback and influence downward ocular deviation, E. p. Br. Res. 101: 169–172.Google Scholar
  69. Sheth, N.V., Dell ‘Osso, L.F., Leigh, RJ., Van Doren, C.L., and Peckham, H.P., 1995, The effects of afferent stimulation on congenital nystagmus foveation periods, Vision Res. 35: 2371–2382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Smith, W.M., 1964,, Control of eye fixation by auditory feedback, Psychon. Sci. 1: 233–234Google Scholar
  71. Spilker, B., 1991, Special modalities: biofeedback, radiation therapy, hyperthermia, hypnosis, electroconvulsive therapy, apheresis, and hyperbaric oxygen, in Guide to Clinical Trials, B. Spilker ed., Raven Press, New York, pp. 653–656.Google Scholar
  72. Stark, L., 1968, Neurological Control Systems, Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  73. Stevenson, RW.W., 1975, The application of contact lenses to nystagmus, Optics (Scotland), June: 4–8.Google Scholar
  74. Stohler, T., 1973, Afterimage treatment in nystagmus, Amer. Orthopt. J. 23: 65–67Google Scholar
  75. Taylor, E.A., 1966, The Fundamental Reading Skill, Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, Ill.Google Scholar
  76. Toates, F.M., 1975, Control Theory in Biology and Experimental Psychology, Hutchinson Educ. Ltd., London.Google Scholar
  77. Van Brocklin, M.D., Vasche, T.R, Hirons, R, and Yolton, R.L., 1981, Biofeedback enhanced strabismus therapy, J. Amer. Optom. Assoc. 52: 731–736.Google Scholar
  78. Wolf, S.L., 2001, Biofeedback, in Downey and Darling’s Physiological Basis of Rehabilitation Medicine, E.G. Gonzalez et al eds., Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, pp. 747–759.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth J. Ciuffreda
    • 1
  • Barry Tannen
    • 2
  • Daniella Rutner
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Vision SciencesState Univ. of New York, State College of OptometryNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Dept. of Clinical SciencesState University of New York, State College of OptometryNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations