Psychophysics and Modeling of Texture Segregation

  • Ramanujan Kashi
  • Thomas V. Papathomas
  • Bela Julesz
Part of the Topics in Biomedical Engineering International Book Series book series (TOBE)


Modern research in visual texture perception can be traced to the pioneering work of Julesz (1962), and Beck (1966). What exactly is visual texture? Even though visual texture is not easy to define, a good “stratified” definition was proposed by Gorea: “Visual texture is a 2D [two-dimensional] visual stimulus characterized by a visible grain. Visual grain consists of local modulations along dimensions such as luminance, color, and shape, which may or may not be discriminable. Two textures are visually different if they do not share the same grain and/or if they do not share, in the statistical sense, the same grain distribution across space.” (Gorea 1995, pp. 55–56). Figure 12.1 shows an example of texture-based segregation. In Fig. 12.1a, the central region consisting of X’s shows a marked segregation from the peripheral region composed of T’s. This is an example of pre-attentive or “pop-out” texture segmentation. However, in Fig. 12.1b, the central region comprising of L’s does not segregate preattentively from the peripheral regions composed of T’s.


Vision Research Optical Society Gabor Filter Texture Segmentation Early Vision 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adelson, E. H., and Bergen, J., 1985, Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion, Journal of the Optical Society of America, 2A: 284–299.Google Scholar
  2. Ahissar, M., and Hochstein, S., 1991, Learning is both stimulus and task specific, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science Supplement, 32: 715Google Scholar
  3. Bach, M., and Meigen, T., 1992, Electrophysiological correlates of texture segregation in the human visual evoked potential, Vision Research, 32: 417–424.Google Scholar
  4. Bach, M., and Meigen, T., 1997, Similar electrophysiological correlates of texture segregation induced by luminance, orientation, motion, and stereo, Vision Research, 37: 1409–1414.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, J., 1966, Perceptual grouping produced by changes in orientation and shape, Science, 154: 538–540.Google Scholar
  6. Beck, J., 1967, Perceptual grouping produced by line figures, Perception and Psychophysics, 2: 491–495.Google Scholar
  7. Beck, J., 1982, Textural segmentation, in: Organization and Representation in Perception, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  8. Beck, J., Graham, N., and Sutter, A., 1991, Lightness differences and the perceived segregation of regions and populations, Perception and Psychophysics, 49: 257–269Google Scholar
  9. Beck, J., Prazdny, K., and Rosenfeld, A., 1983, A theory of textural segmentation, in: Human and Machine Vision, J. Beck, B. Hope, and A. Rosenfeld, ed., Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Beck, J., Sutter, A., and Ivry, R., 1987, Spatial frequency channels and perceptual grouping in texture segregation, Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, 37: 299–325Google Scholar
  11. Bergen, J. R., 1991, Theories of visual texture perception, in: Vision and Visual Dysfunction, D. Regan, ed., Vol 10, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Bergen, J. R., and Adelson, E.H., 1986, Visual texture segmentation based on energy measures, Journal of the Optical Society of America, 3A: 98.Google Scholar
  13. Bergen, J. R., and Adelson, E.H., 1988, Early vision and texture perception, Nature, 333: 363–364.Google Scholar
  14. Bergen, J.R., and Julesz, B., 1983, Parallel versus serial processing in rapid pattern discrimination, Nature, 303: 696–698.Google Scholar
  15. Bergen, J.R., and Landy, M. S., 1991, Computational modeling of visual texture segregation, in: Computational Models of Visual Perception, M.S. Landy and J.A Movshon, editors, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  16. Bonds, A. B., 1989, Role of inhibition in the specification of orientation selectivity of cells in the cat striate cortex, Visual Neuroscience, 2: 41–55.Google Scholar
  17. Bovik, A. C., Clark, M., and Geisler, W. S., 1987, Computational texture analysis using localized spatial filtering, in: Proceedings of the Workshop on Computer Vision, IEEE Computer Society Press, Miami Beach, pp 201–206.Google Scholar
  18. Bravo, M., and Nakayama, K., 1994, The role of attention in different visual-search tasks, Perception and Psychophysics, 51: 465–472.Google Scholar
  19. Buckley, D., and Fisby, J. P., 1993, Interaction of stereo, texture and outline cues in the shape perception of three-dimensional ridges, Vision Research, 33: 919–933.Google Scholar
  20. Caelli, T., 1982, On discriminating visual textures and images, Perception and Psychophysics, 31: 149–159.Google Scholar
  21. Caelli, T., 1985, Three processing characteristics of visual texture segmentation, Spatial Vision, 1: 19–30.Google Scholar
  22. Caelli, T., and Julesz, B., 1978, On perceptual analyzers of visual texture discrimination, Biological Cybernetics, 28: 167–175.Google Scholar
  23. Caelli, T., and Julesz, B., 1979, Psychophysical evidence for global feature processing in visual texture discrimination, Journal of the Optical Society of America, 69: 675–677Google Scholar
  24. Callahan, T. C., 1989, Interference and dominance in texture segregation: Hue, geometric form, and line orientation, Perception and Psychophysics, 46: 299–311.Google Scholar
  25. Callahan, T. C., Lasaga, M. I., and Garner, W. R, 1986, Visual texture segregation based on orientation and hue, Perception and Psychophysics, 39: 32–38.Google Scholar
  26. Cannon, M. W., and Fullenkamp, S. C., 1991, Spatial interactions in apparent contrast: Inhibitory effects among grating patterns of different spatial frequencies, spatial positions and orientations. Vision Research, 31: 1985–1998.Google Scholar
  27. Caputo, G., 1996, The role of the background: Texture segregation and figure-ground Segmentation, Vision Research, 36: 2815–2826.Google Scholar
  28. Caputo, G., 1998, Texture brightness filling-in, Vision Research, 38: 841–851Google Scholar
  29. Chubb, C., and Sperling, G., 1988, Drift-balanced random stimuli: A general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception, Journal of the Optical Society of America, 5A: 1986–2006.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  30. Chubb, C., and Sperling, G., 1989, Second-order motion perception: Space/time separable mechanisms, in: Proceedings of the Workshop on Visual Motion, pp. 126–138.Google Scholar
  31. Daugman, J. G., 1987, Image analysis and compact coding by oriented 2-D Gabor primitives, S.P.I.E. Proceedings, 758: 19–30.Google Scholar
  32. Daugman, J. G., 1988, Complete discrete 2-D Gabor transforms by neural networks for image analysis and compression, IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 36: 1169–1179.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. DeYoe, E. A., and VanEssen, D. C., 1988, Concurrent processing streams in monkey visual cortex, Trends in Neuroscience, 11: 219–226.Google Scholar
  34. Durgin, F. H., and Huk, A. C., 1997, Texture density after-effects in the perception of natural and artificial textures, Vision Research, 37: 3273–3282.Google Scholar
  35. Enn, J., 1986, Seeing textons in context, Perception and Psychophysics, 39: 143–147Google Scholar
  36. Fogel, I., and Sagi, D., 1989, Gabor filters as texture discriminator, Biological Cybernetics, 61: 103–113.Google Scholar
  37. Gallant, J. L., van Essen, D. C., and Nothdurft, H. C., 1995, Two-dimensional and three-dimensional texture processing in visual cortex of the macaque monkey, in: Early Vision and Beyond, T.V. Papathomas, C. Chubb, A. Gorea, and E. Kowler, editors, pp 89–98, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  38. Garner, W. R., and Feldoldy, G. L., 1970, Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various types of information processing, Cognitive Psychology, 1: 225–241.Google Scholar
  39. Gibson, J., 1950, The perception of the visual world, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA. Gorea, A., 1995, Visual texture, in: Early Vision and Beyond, T.V. Papathomas, C. Chubb, A. Gorea, and E. Kowler, editors, pp. 55–57, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  40. Gorge, A., and Papathomas, T. V., 1999, Luminance, color, and orientation: Local versus global contrasts in texture segregation, Journal of the Optical Society of America, 16A (3): 728–741.Google Scholar
  41. Gorea, A., and Papathomas, T. V., 1989, The role of color and orientation matching in texture discrimination, Presented at Annual OSA Meeting, Technical Digest Series, 18: 161.Google Scholar
  42. Gorea, A., and Papathomas, T. V., 1991, Texture segregation by chromatic and achromatic visual pathways: An analogy with motion processing, Journal of the Optical Society of America, 8A (2): 386–393.Google Scholar
  43. Gorea, A., and Papathomas, T. V., 1991b, Extending a class of motion stimuli to study multi-attribute texture perception, Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 23 (1): 5–8.Google Scholar
  44. Gores, A., and Papathomas, T. V., 1993, Double-opponency as a generalized concept in texture segregation illustrated with color, luminance and orientation defined stimuli, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 10: 1450–1462.Google Scholar
  45. Gouras, P., and Kruger, J., 1979, Responses of cells in foveal visual cortex of the monkey to pure color contrast, Journal of Neurophysiology, 42: 850–860.Google Scholar
  46. Graham, N., 1991, Complex channels, early local nonlinearities, and normalization in texture segregation, in: Computational Models of Visual Perception, M.S. Landy and J.A Movshon, editors, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  47. Graham, N., Beck, J., and Sutter, A., 1992, Nonlinear processes in spatial-frequency channel models of perceived texture segregation: Effects of sign and amount of contrast, Vision Research, 32: 719–743.Google Scholar
  48. Grossberg, S., and Mingolla, E., 1985, Neural dynamics of perceptual grouping: Textures, boundaries and emergent segmentations, Perception and Psychophysics, 38: 141–171Google Scholar
  49. Grossberg, S., and Mingolla, E., 1986, Computer simulation of neural networks for perceptual psychology. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 18: 601–607.Google Scholar
  50. Gurney, R., and Browse, R., 1987, Micropattem properties and presentation conditions influencing visual texture discrimination, Perception and Psychophysics, 41: 239–252Google Scholar
  51. Julesz, B., 1962, Visual texture discrimination, IRE Transactions on Information Theory, 8: 84–92.Google Scholar
  52. Julesz, B., 1965, Texture and visual perception, Scientific American, 212: 38–48.Google Scholar
  53. Julesz, B., 1981, Textons, the elements of texture perception and their interactions, Nature, 290: 91–97.Google Scholar
  54. Julesz, B., 1981, A theory of preattentive texture discrimination based on first-order statistics of textons, Biological Cybernetics, 41: 131–138.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  55. Julesz, B., 1995, Dialogues on Perception, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  56. Julesz, B., and Bergen, J. R., 1983, Textons, the fundamental elements in preattentive vision and perception of textures, The Bell System Technical Journal, 62: 1619–1645Google Scholar
  57. Julesz, B., Gilbert, E.N., and Victor, J. D., 1978, Visual discrimination of textures with identical third-order statistics, Biological Cybernetics, 31: 137–140.Google Scholar
  58. Kashi, R. S., Papathomas, T. V., and Gorea, A. G., 1994, A perceptually based computational model for texture segregation of color images, Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Visual Signal Processing and Communications. IEEE Press.Google Scholar
  59. Kashi, R. S., Papathomas, T. V., and Gorea, A. G., 1997, Grouping in sparse random-dot patterns: Linear and non-linear mechanisms, Proceedings of the SPIE conference on human vision and electronic imaging, 3016: 420–429.Google Scholar
  60. Kashi, R. S., Papathomas, T. V., Gorea, A. G., and Julesz, B., 1996, Similarities between texture grouping and motion perception: The role of color, luminance, and orientation. International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology, 7: 85–91.Google Scholar
  61. Knierim, J. J., and van Essen, D. C., 1992, Neuronal responses to static texture patterns in area VI of the alert macaque monkey, Journal of Neurophysiology, 67: 4: 961–980Google Scholar
  62. Knill, D. C., 1998, Discrimination of planar surface from texture: human and ideal observers compared, Vision Research, 38: 1683–1711.Google Scholar
  63. Knill, D. C., 1998b, Surface orientation from texture: ideal observers, generic observers, and the information content of texture cues, Vision Research, 38: 1655–1682.Google Scholar
  64. Krose, B. J. A., 1987, Local structure analyzers as determinants of preattentive pattern discrimination, Biological Cybernetics, 55: 289–298.Google Scholar
  65. Kwan, L., and Regan, D., 1998, Orientation-tuned spatial filters for texture-defined form, Vision Research, 38: 3849–3855.Google Scholar
  66. Lamme, V. A., van Dijk, B. W., and Spekreijse, H., 1992, Texture segregation is processed by primary visual cortex in man and monkey: Evidence from VEP experiments, Vision Research, 32: 797–807.Google Scholar
  67. Landy, M. S., and Bergen, J. R, 1991, Texture segregation and orientation gradient, Vision Research, 31: 679–691.Google Scholar
  68. Li, A., and Lennie, P., 1997, Mechanisms underlying segmentation of colored textures, Vision Research, 37: 83–97.Google Scholar
  69. Livingstone, M. S., and Hubel, D. H., 1988, Segregation of form, color, movement and depth: Anatomy, physiology and perception, Science, 240: 740–749.Google Scholar
  70. Malik, J., and Perona, P., 1989, A computational model of human texture perception, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science Supplement, 30: 161Google Scholar
  71. Malik, J., and Perona, P., 1990, Preattentive texture discrimination with early vision mechanisms, Journal of the Optical Society ofAmerica, 7A: 923–932.Google Scholar
  72. Marr, D., and Poggio, T., 1976, Cooperative computation of stereo disparity. Science, 194: 283–287.Google Scholar
  73. Marr, D., and Poggio, T., 1979, A computational theory of human stereo vision, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 204: 301–328.Google Scholar
  74. Michael, C.R., 1979, Color-sensitive hypercomplex cells in monkey striate cortex, Journal of Neurophysiology, 42: 726–744.Google Scholar
  75. Milcami, A., Newsome, W.T., and Wurtz, R.H., 1986, Motion selectivity in macaque visual cortex: Spatio-temporal range nf directional interactions in MT and VI, Journal of Physiology, 55: 1328–1339.Google Scholar
  76. Nakayama, K., and Silverman, G. H., 1986, Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions, Nature, 320: 264–265.Google Scholar
  77. Narn, J. H., and Chubb, C., 1988, Perceived texture contrast is determined by a negative half-wave rectifying mechanism, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science Supplement, 39: 649.Google Scholar
  78. Northdurft, H. C., and Parlitz, D., 1993, Absence of express saccades to texture or motion defined targets, Vision Research, 33: 1367–1383.Google Scholar
  79. Northdurft, H. C., 1985, Sensitivity for structure gradient in texture discrimination tasks, Vision Research, 25: 1957–1988.Google Scholar
  80. Northdurft, H. C., 1990, Texture discrimination by cells in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus, Experimental Brain Research, 82: 48–56.Google Scholar
  81. Ohzawa, I., DeAngelis, G. C., and Freeman, R. D., 1990, Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: Neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors, Science, 249: 1037–1041Google Scholar
  82. Papathomas, T. V., Gorea, A., Feher, A., and Conway, T. E., 1999, Attention-based texture segregation, Perception and Psychophysics.Google Scholar
  83. Papathomas, T. V., Kashi, R. S., and Gorea, A., 1997, A human vision based computational model for chromatic texture segregation, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics-Part B: Cybernetics, 27 (3): 428–440.Google Scholar
  84. Pessoa, L., Beck, J., and Mingolla, E., 1996, Perceived texture segregation in chromatic element-arrangement pattern: High intensity interference, Vision Research, 36: 1745–1760.Google Scholar
  85. Poggio, G. F., Motter, B. C., Squatrito, S., and Trotter, Y., 1985, Responses of neurons in visual cortex VI and V2 of the alert macaque to dynamic random-dot stereograms, Vision Research, 25: 397–406.Google Scholar
  86. Polat, U., and Sagi, D., 1992, Lateral interactions between spatial channels: Suppression and facilitation revealed by lateral masking, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science Supplement, 33: 1345.Google Scholar
  87. Rao, R. A., and Lohse, G. L., 1966, Towards a texture naming system: Identifying relevant dimensions of texture, Vision Research, 36: 1649–1669.Google Scholar
  88. Reichardt, W., 1961, Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system, in: Sensory Communication, W.A. Rosenblith, editor Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  89. Rosenholtz, R., and Malik, J., 1997, Surface orientation from texture: isotropy or homogeneity (or both)? Vision Research, 37: 2283–2293.Google Scholar
  90. Rubenstein, B. S., and Sagi, D., 1990, Spatial variability as a limiting factor in texture-discrimination tasks: Implications and performance, Journal of the Optical Society of America, 7A: 1632–1643.Google Scholar
  91. Sagi, D., 1995, The psychophysics of texture segmentation, in: Early Vision and Beyond, T.V. Papathomas, C. Chubb, A. Gorea, and E. Kowler, editors, pp. 89–98, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  92. Sagi, D., and Julesz, B., 1987, Short-range limitation on detection of feature differences, Spatial Vision, 2: 29–49.Google Scholar
  93. Shatz, B. R., 1977, The computation of immediate texture discrimination, MIT AI Memo, page 426.Google Scholar
  94. Sperling, G., 1989, Three stages and two systems of visual processing, Spatial Vision, 4: 183–207.Google Scholar
  95. Sutter, A., Beck, J., and Graham, N., 1989, Contrast and spatial variables in texture segregation: Testing a simple spatial-frequency channels model, Perception and Psychophysics, 46: 312–332.Google Scholar
  96. Treisman, A., and Gelade, G., 1980, A feature integration theory of attention, Cognitive Psychology, 12: 97–136.Google Scholar
  97. Treisman, A., and Gormican, S., 1988, Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries, Psychological Reviews, 95: 15–48.Google Scholar
  98. Troje, N. F., and Bulthoff, H. H., 1996, Face recognition under varying poses: The role of texture and shape, Vision Research, 36: 1761–1771.Google Scholar
  99. Turner, M. R., 1986, Texture discrimination by Gabor functions, Biological Cybernetics, 55: 71–82.Google Scholar
  100. van Essen, E. A., DeYoe, E. A., Olavarria, J. F., Krierim, J. J., Fox, J. M., Sagi, D., and Julesz, B., 1990, Neural responses to static and moving texture patterns in visual cortex of the macaque monkey, in: Neural Mechanisms of Visual Perception, D.M.K. Lam and C.D. Gilbert, editors, pp. 137–154. Porfolio Publishing, Woodlands TX.Google Scholar
  101. Van Santen, J. P. H., and Sperling, G., 1985, Elaborated Reichardt detectors, Journal of the Optical Society of America, 2A: 300–321.Google Scholar
  102. Victor, J. D., and Conte, M. M., 1996, The role of high-order phase correlations in texture processing, Vision Research, 36: 1615–1632.Google Scholar
  103. Victor, J. D., Conte, M. M., Purpura, K., and Katz, E., 1995, Isodipole textures: a window on cortical mechanisms of form processing, in: Early Vision and Beyond, T.V. Papathomas, C. Chubb, A. Gorea, and E. Kowler, editors, pp. 89–98, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  104. Voorhees, H., and Poggio, T., 1988, Computing texture boundaries from images, Nature, 333: 364–367.Google Scholar
  105. Watson, A. B., and Ahtunada, A. J., 1985, Model of human visual-motion sensing, Journal of the Optical Society of America, 2A: 322–342.Google Scholar
  106. Watt, R. J., 1995, Some speculations on the role of texture processing in visual Perception, in: Early Vision and Beyond, T.V. Papathomas, C. Chubb, A. Gores, and E. Kowler, editors, pp. 89–98, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  107. Wilson, H., and Mast, R., 1993, Illusory motion of texture boundaries, Vision Research, 33: 1437–1446.Google Scholar
  108. Wolfe, J. M., 1992, Effortless texture segmentation and ‘parallel’ visual search are not the same thing, Vision Research, 32: 757–763.Google Scholar
  109. Zeki, S. M., 1973, Colour coding in rhesus monkey prestriate cortex, Brain Research, 53: 422–427.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ramanujan Kashi
    • 1
  • Thomas V. Papathomas
    • 2
  • Bela Julesz
    • 3
  1. 1.Avaya Labs ResearchBasking RidgeUSA
  2. 2.Dept. of Biomedical Engineering and Laboratory of Vision ResearchRutgers UniversityPiscatawayUSA
  3. 3.Dept. of Psychology and Laboratory of Vision ResearchRutgers UniversityPiscatawayUSA

Personalised recommendations