This paper describes a theory of word structure which incorporates aspects of markedness theory. The theory is illustrated by an account of some facts of English phonotactics and of first and second language acquisition. The phonotactic phenomena serve as the basis for justifying a rich hierarchical structure of English words. The theory presented here is an extension and revision of the one described in Cairns (1982), where I justified a structure of English monomorphemic words which contains syllables ($) and feet (F) as labelled nodes subordinate to the root node word (W). With the exception of some word-initial syllables, all syllables are in bisyllabic or (under special conditions) trisyllabic feet. The first syllable of the English foot is labelled the head syllable ($h). $h enjoys special status in two ways: It is the repository of relative prominence (stress) and allows a greater variety of phonemes and combinations thereof than nonhead syllables. The theory of word structure is illustrated in this paper by an account of aspects of English consonant clusters, especially in the onset; the overall structure of the syllable is also a key focus, especially in the illustrations of the application of this approach to applied linguistics.
KeywordsLanguage Acquisition Phonological Representation Lexical Representation Apply Linguistics Syllable Structure
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Cairns, C. 1971 Review of Principles of Phonology (by N. S. Trubetzkoy), translated by Christine Baltaxe, Language, 47, 918–931.Google Scholar
- Cairns, C. 1977 Universal Properties of Umlaut and Vowel Coalescence Rules: Implications for Rotuman Phonology. In Alphonse Juilland (ed) Linguistic Studies Offered to Joseph Greenberg. Saratoga, Calif: Anma Libri.Google Scholar
- Cairns, C. 1982 “Prosodic Structures in the Lexicon,” paper presented at the Conference on Distinctive Features, State University of New York at Stony Brook, May 1981.Google Scholar
- Cairns, C. and M. Feinstein 1982 “Markedness and the Theory of Syllable Structure,” Linguistic Inquiry, 13, 193–225.Google Scholar
- Eckman, F. 1984 “Universals, Typologies and Interlanguage,” In W. E. Rutherford (ed.) Language Universals and Second Language Acquisition, 79–105. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Ferguson, C. 1963 “Assumptions about Nasals: A Sample Study in Phonological Universals,” in J. Greenberg (ed.) Universals of Language, Cambridge: MIT Press, 42–47.Google Scholar
- Greenberg, C. 1983 Syllable Structure in Second LanguageGoogle Scholar
- Acquisition,“ in press in CUNYFORUM, City University of New York: New York.Google Scholar
- Greenberg, J. 1960 Universals of Language. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
- Greenberg, J. 1978 “Some Generalizations Concerning Initial and Final Consonant Clusters,” in J. Greenberg, C. Ferguson, and E. Moravcsik (eds.) Universals of Human Language, vol. 2: Phonology, 243–279. (Originally published in 1964 in Russian in Voprosy Jazykoznanija and subsequently in English in 1965 in Linguistics.)Google Scholar
- Jakobson, R. 1939 “Signe zéro,” Mélanges Bally, 143–152.Google Scholar
- Kean, M. L. 1975 The Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar, Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Menn, L. 1978 “Phonological Units in Beginning Speech,” in A. Bell and J. Hooper (eds.) Syllables and Segments, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 157–171.Google Scholar