Skip to main content

Markedness — An Overview

  • Chapter
Markedness

Abstract

There is a relationship between the degree of our familiarity with things and the number of subdistinctions we can perceive among them. The better we know things the more we are able to detect secondary characteristics which assign them into sub-classes. This is widely illustrable perhaps from all areas of human perception. For example, Caucasians who do not often encounter Asians will perceive all Orientals as looking alike. Or: people who have never consciously observed bird songs will hear most birds as sounding the same. Besides conceptual rapport, simple temporal distance also blurs differences among things. Thus, events that are long past in one’s life may lose their special characteristics: all childhood friends may later be recalled as more or less indistinct members of the general class. And, of course, spatial distance itself also obscures subdistinctions: trees may seem all alike if viewed at great distance such as from a mountain top whereas, when seen at close range, they turn out to represent many subtypes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aguas, E. F. 1968. Gudandji. Pacific Linguistics, Series A: Occasional Papers 14. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, Joseph H. 1966. Language universals. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Cecil H. and Stanley R. Witkowski, 1980. Language universals. In David Levinson and Martin J. Malone, ed., Toward explaining human culture: a critical review of the findings of world wide cross-cultural research. HRAF Press. 359–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayerthaler, Willi, 1982. Markiertheit in der Phonologie. Unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkowski, Stanley R. and Cecil H. Brown. 1983. Marking-reversals and cultural importance. Language. 59, 3, 569–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Linda J. 1980. Syntactic markedness and frequency of occurrence. In Thomas Perry, ed., Evidence and Argumentation in Linguistics. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moravcsik, E., Wirth, J. (1986). Markedness — An Overview. In: Eckman, F.R., Moravcsik, E.A., Wirth, J.R. (eds) Markedness. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5718-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5718-7_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3205-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-5718-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics