Skip to main content

Turn Taking versus Discourse Structure

  • Chapter
Machine Conversations

Abstract

The Turing test has always been conceived of as a test of the content of a computer’s contribution to a conversation. That is, from typed output, we are supposed to try to tell whether text was generated by a human or a computer. Recent advances in speech technology have led us to conceive of a Turing test taken over the phone. What about a face-to-face Turing test? What kinds of behaviors would a computer have to exhibit to convince us that it was not a grey box but a living, breathing body? We are perhaps not ready today for such a competition, but7 we may be one day. This paper attempts to move the field of human-computer conversation in that direction—in the direction of embodied dialogue with computers. In other work (Cassell et al., 1994; Cassell and Thórisson, in press), we have concentrated on hand gestures, intonation, head movement, and gaze. The current work revisits the question of gaze and attempts to reconcile two competing approaches to the general question of generating nonverbal behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Cassell, J., Pelachaud, C., Badler, N.I., Steedman, M., Achorn, B., Beckett, T., Douville, B., Prevost, S. and Stone, M. 1994. “Animated Conversation: Rule-Based Generation of Facial Expression, Gesture and Spoken Intonation for Multiple Conversational Agents.” Computer Graphics 94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassell, J. and S. Prevost. (in preparation). “Embodied Natural Language Generation: A Framework for Generating Speech and Gesture.”

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassell, J. and Thôrisson, K. (in press). “The Power of a Nod and a Glance: Envelope vs. Emotional Feedback in Animated Conversation Agents.” Journal of Applied Artificial Intelligence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, S. Jr. 1972. “Some Signals and Rules for Taking Speaking Turns in Conversations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23 (2), 283–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, S. Jr. 1974. “On the Structure of Speaker-Auditor Interaction during Speaking Turns.” Language in Society, 3 (2), 161–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. 1981. Conversational Organization: Interaction between Hearers and Speakers. Academic Press. New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. 1967. Intonation and Grammar in British English. Mouton: The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luff, P., Gilbert N., Frohlich, D., eds. 1990. Computers and Conversation.: Academic Press. New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelachaud, C., Badler N. and Steedman, M. 1996. “Generating Facial Expressions for Speech.” Cognitive Science, 20 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prevost, S. 1996. “An Information Structural Approach to Spoken Language Generation.” Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. 1992. Lectures on Conversation, Vol. I and II.: Blackwell. Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A. and Jefferson, G.A. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking in Conversation.” Language, 50, 696–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi, A. and Nagao, K. 1993. “Communicative Facial Displays as a New Conversational Modality.” Proceedings of InterCHi 93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Th6risson, K.R. 1997. “Gandalf: An Embodied Humanoid Capable of Real-Time Multimodal Dialogue with People.” Autonomous Agents 97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, S. and Stenton, P. 1988. “Cues and Control in Expert-Client Dialogues.” Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallduvi, E. 1990. “The Informational Component.” PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cassell, J., Torres, O.E., Prevost, S. (1999). Turn Taking versus Discourse Structure. In: Wilks, Y. (eds) Machine Conversations. The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science, vol 511. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5687-6_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5687-6_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5092-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-5687-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics