A Graphical Classification of Survival Distributions
The S-distribution is defined in the form of a four-parameter nonlinear differential equation, with the cumulative distribution function of the survival time as the dependent variable and the survival time as the independent variable. The first parameter characterizes the location, the second the scale, and the other two the shape of the model. The S-distribution covers the logistic distribution and the exponential distribution as special cases and approximates other common survival models with rather high precision. The S-distribution is used to classify common survival distributions within a two-dimensional space in which characteristics related to the shape of the density function and the hazard function can be studied. Nonlinear regression methods are used in the classification procedure.
KeywordsMean Square Error Shape Parameter Exponential Distribution Hazard Function Pareto Distribution
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Cox, D.R., and Oakes, D. (1984), Analysis of Survival Data, New York, NY: Chapman and Hall. Gehan, E.A. (1965), “A Generalized Wilcoxon Text for Comparing Arbitrarily Single-Censored Samples,” Biometrika, 52, 203–523.Google Scholar
- Kalbfleisch, J.D. and Prentice, R.L. (1980), Survival Models and Data Analysis, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
- Prentice, R.L. (1975), “Discrimination Among Some Parametric Models,” Biometrika, 62, 607614.Google Scholar
- Ralston, M.L., Jennrich, R.I., Sampson, P.F., and Uno, F.K. (1988), “Fitting Pharmacokinetic Models With Program AR: New Instructions for PCs and Mainframes,” BMDP Technical Report, #85. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software, Inc.Google Scholar
- Voit, E.O. (1991), “Canonical Nonlinear Modeling, S-System Approach to Understanding Complexity,” New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
- Voit, E.O. (1992), “The S-distribution: a Tool for Approximation and Classification of UnivariateGoogle Scholar
- Unimodal Probability Distributions,“ Biometrical Journal,34, (1992) 7, 855–878.Google Scholar