A Graphical Classification of Survival Distributions

  • Shawn S. Yu
  • Eberhard O. Vorr


The S-distribution is defined in the form of a four-parameter nonlinear differential equation, with the cumulative distribution function of the survival time as the dependent variable and the survival time as the independent variable. The first parameter characterizes the location, the second the scale, and the other two the shape of the model. The S-distribution covers the logistic distribution and the exponential distribution as special cases and approximates other common survival models with rather high precision. The S-distribution is used to classify common survival distributions within a two-dimensional space in which characteristics related to the shape of the density function and the hazard function can be studied. Nonlinear regression methods are used in the classification procedure.


Mean Square Error Shape Parameter Exponential Distribution Hazard Function Pareto Distribution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Cox, D.R., and Oakes, D. (1984), Analysis of Survival Data, New York, NY: Chapman and Hall. Gehan, E.A. (1965), “A Generalized Wilcoxon Text for Comparing Arbitrarily Single-Censored Samples,” Biometrika, 52, 203–523.Google Scholar
  2. Gross, A.J., and Clark, V.A. (1975), Survival Distributions: Reliability Applications in the Biomedical Sciences, New York, NY: Wiley.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Halley, E. (1693), “An Estimate of the Degrees of the Mortality of Mankind, Drawn From Curious Tables of the Births and Funerals of the City of Breslau,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 17, 596–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Johnson, N.L., and Kotz, S. (1970), Continuous Univariate Distributions, Boston: Houghton Miffl in Co.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Kalbfleisch, J.D. and Prentice, R.L. (1980), Survival Models and Data Analysis, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Kaplan, E.L. and Meier P. (1958), “Nonparametric Estimation From Incomplete Observations.,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53, 457–481.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Prentice, R.L. (1975), “Discrimination Among Some Parametric Models,” Biometrika, 62, 607614.Google Scholar
  8. Ralston, M.L., Jennrich, R.I., Sampson, P.F., and Uno, F.K. (1988), “Fitting Pharmacokinetic Models With Program AR: New Instructions for PCs and Mainframes,” BMDP Technical Report, #85. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software, Inc.Google Scholar
  9. Voit, E.O. (1991), “Canonical Nonlinear Modeling, S-System Approach to Understanding Complexity,” New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  10. Voit, E.O. (1992), “The S-distribution: a Tool for Approximation and Classification of UnivariateGoogle Scholar
  11. Unimodal Probability Distributions,“ Biometrical Journal,34, (1992) 7, 855–878.Google Scholar
  12. Voit, E.O., and Yu, S. (1994), “The S-distribution: Approximation of Discrete Distributions.,” Biometrical Journal, 36, (1994) 2, 205–219.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shawn S. Yu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Eberhard O. Vorr
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Center of BiometricsSyntex Inc.Palo AltoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biometry and EpidemiologyMedical University of South CarolinaCharlestonUSA

Personalised recommendations