Efficiently Weighted Estimating Equations with Application to Proportional Excess Hazards

  • Peter D. Sasieni


A general approach to estimation, that can lead to efficient estimation in two stages, is presented. The method will not always be available, but sufficient conditions for efficiency are provided together with four examples of its use: (1) estimation of the odds ratio in 1:M matched case-control studies with a dichotomous exposure variable; (2) estimation of the relative hazard in a two-sample survival setting; (3) estimation of the regression parameters in the proportional excess hazards model; and (4) estimation in a partly linear parametric additive hazards model. The method depends upon finding a family of weighted estimating equations, which includes a simple initial equation yielding a consistent estimate and also an equation that yields an efficient estimate, provided the optiomal weights are used.


Efficient Score Nuisance Parameter Partial Likelihood Predictable Process Conditional Likelihood 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andersen, P.K., and Gill, R.D. (1982), “Cox’s regression model for counting processes: a large sample study,” Annals of Statistics, 10, 1100–1121.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Begun, J.M. (1987), “Estimates of relative risk,” Metrika, 34, 65–82.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Begun, J.M., and Reid, N. (1983), “Estimating the relative risk with censored data,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78, 337–41.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bickel, P.J., Klaassen, C.A.J., Ritov, Y., and Wellner, J.A. (1993), Efficient and Adaptive Estimation for Semiparametric Models, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Breslow, N.E., and Day, N.E. (1980), Statistical Methods in Cancer Research: Volume I - The analysis of case-control studies, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon.Google Scholar
  6. Cox, D.R. (1970), The Analysis of Binary Data, London: MethuenzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Cox, D.R. (1972), “Regression models and life tables, (with discussion),” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 34, 187–220.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Crowley, J.J., Liu, P.Y., and Voelkel, J.G. (1982), “Estimation of the ratio of hazard functions”, in Crowley, J.J. and Johnson, R.A., editors, Lecture notes — Monograph series 2,Survival Analysis, pp 56–73. Institute of Mathematical Statistics: Hayward, California.Google Scholar
  9. Cuzick, J. (1993), “Efficient estimates in semiparametric additive regression models with unknown error distribution”, Annals of Statistics, 20, 1129–1136.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. McKeague, I., and Sasieni, P. (1994), “A partly parametric additive risk model,” Biometrika, 81, 501–514.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sasieni, P. (1994), “Small-sample study of an efficient estimator of the odds ratio under multiple matching,” Biometrics, 50, 140–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sasieni, P. (1995), “Proportional excess hazards,” Submitted.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter D. Sasieni
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Math, Stats and EpidemiologyImperial Cancer Research FundLondonEngland

Personalised recommendations