Coal and Its Derivatives

  • David J. Rose
Part of the Modern Perspectives in Energy book series (MPIE)

Abstract

Coal is the most plentiful of all “conventional”* fossil fuels in the United States and around the world. Its distribution is uneven. U.S. coal resources exceed oil resources by about a factor of 10, and U.S. natural gas resources by a less certain but probably comparable factor. Removing it from the ground is, on the whole, not technically difficult and these several attractions have stimulated the U.S. government and many other public and private organizations to plan large increases in the use of coal during the coming years. The 400–500 billion tons of economically and technologically available reserves in the United States would last 600 years at present rate of use, and an estimated 4 trillion tons of ultimate resource would last much longer. The USSR and China are comparably rich in coal; Australia, Indonesia, India, and other countries have large or at least substantial deposits, so for some countries at least, raw availability is no problem. But for reasons to be given shortly, the actual increases will be more modest than have recently been prophesied.

Keywords

Bituminous Coal Electrostatic Precipitator Strip Mining Longwall Mining Unit Train 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. APS Study Group (1981). “Report to the American Physical Society by the Study Group on Research Planning for Coal Utilization and Synthetic Fuel Production,” Rev. Mod Phys. 55(4, Part 2) (October).Google Scholar
  2. Braunstein, H. M., Copenhaver, E. D., and Pfuderer, H. A., (Eds.) (1977). Environmental Health and Control Aspects of Coal Conversion: An Information Overview, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report ORNL/EIS-95 (April); Vol. 1, Chapters 1–5; Vol. 2, Chapters 6–10.Google Scholar
  3. CONAES (1980). Energy in Transition— 1985–2010, W. H. Freeman Co., San Francisco.Google Scholar
  4. EPRI (1979a) Electric Power Res. Inst. J. (June).Google Scholar
  5. EPRI (1979b) Electric Power Res. Inst J. (July/August), 15–19. Discusses S02 removal, including processes under development.Google Scholar
  6. FEA (1974). Project Independence Blueprint, Report by the U.S. Federal Energy Administration.Google Scholar
  7. Gorbaty, M. L., Wright, F. L., Lyon, R. K., Long, R. B., Schlosberg, R. H., Baset, Z., Liotta, R., Silbernagcl, B. G., and Neskora, D. R, (1979), Science 206, 1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Häfele, W. et al (1981). Energy in a Finite World, Vol, I, Paths to a Sustainable Future, Prepared by the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Austria, Ballinger Publishing Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  9. Horwitch, M. (1980). in: “Uncontrolled and Unfocused Growth” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, Vol 5 (3), 231.Google Scholar
  10. IRD (1980). Industrial Research/Development, pp. 44 (January).Google Scholar
  11. Landsberg, H. H. (Ed.) (1979), Energy: The Next Twenty Years, Ballinger Publishing Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts. See especially Chapter 10, pp. 343 et seq.Google Scholar
  12. Lave, L. and Seskin, E. P. (1977). Air Pollution and Human Health, Johns Hopkins University Press and Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
  13. Marovelli, R. R., and Karhnak, J. M. (1982). “The Mechanization of Mining,” Set Am. 247 (September), 91–102.Google Scholar
  14. McElroy, W. M., Carr, R. C., Ensor, D. J., and Markowski, G. R. (1982). Science 215(13) (1 January).Google Scholar
  15. ORNL-5361 (1978). Environmental and Health Aspects of Disposal of Solid Wastes from Coal Conversion: An Information Assessment, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (September).Google Scholar
  16. ORNL Review (1980). Oak Ridge National Laboratory (Winter). OTA (1978). “A Technology Assessment of Coal Slurry Pipelines,” Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402, GPO Stock No. 052–003–00523–9. OTA published an updated summary September 1980 (Report OTA-E-127).Google Scholar
  17. OTA (1979). “The Direct Use of Coal: Prospects and Problems of Production and Combustion,” Congressional Office of Technology Assessment (1979). Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402.Google Scholar
  18. OTA (1981). “Patterns and Trends in Federal Coal Lease Ownership: 1950–1980,” OTA Technical Memorandum, 1981, Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402, GPO Stock No. 052–003–0799–1.Google Scholar
  19. Pitts, J. N., Jr., Lockensgard, D. M., Ripley, P. S., Van Cauwenberghe, K. A., Van Vaeck, L., Shaffer, S. D., Thill, A. J., and Besler, W. L., Jr. (1980). Science 210, 1347 (19 December).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Salk, M. S., and DeCicco, S. G. (Eds.) (1978). Environmental Monitoring Handbook for Coal Conversion Facilities, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report ORNL-5319 (May).Google Scholar
  21. Stobaugh, R. and Yergin, D. (Eds.) (1979). Energy Futures: A Report of the Energy Project at the Harvard Business School Random House, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Walton, B. T. (1981). “Chemical Impurity Produces Extra Compound Eyes and Heads in Crickets’”, Science 212 (5) 0 April).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wilson, C. L. (1980). Project Director. Coal—Bridge to the Future, Report of the World Coal Study (WOCOL), Ballinger Publishing Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • David J. Rose
    • 1
  1. 1.Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations