Skip to main content

Latent Class Models for Measuring

  • Chapter
Latent Trait and Latent Class Models

Abstract

Most latent class analysis in contemporary social research is aimed at data reduction or “building clusters for qualitative data” (Formann, 1985, p. 87; see also Aitkin, Anderson, & Hinde, 1981). Some special restricted models in this area have of course been used to represent structural characteristics or behavioral processes (e.g., Clogg, 1981a; Goodman, 1974a). But a careful examination of the latent class models now available shows that none deal in a direct way with measurement, particularly if exacting standards are used to define how measurement should take place. Extensions and modifications of latent class models reported below are intended to remove this deficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aitkin, M., Anderson, D., and Hinde, J. (1981). Statistical modeling of data on teaching styles. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 144, 419–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, E. B. (1980). Discrete statistical models with social science applications. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, D. J. (1980). Scaling binary data using a factor model. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 42, 293–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, M. P., and Clogg, C. C. (1986). A note on approximating correlations from odds ratios. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1983). Some contributions to efficient statistics in structural models: Specification and estimation of moment structures. Psychometrika, 48, 493–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, Y. M. M., Fienberg, S. E., and Holland, P. W. (1975). Discrete multivariate analysis: Theory and Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, N. (1977). A theory of consistency of ordering generalizable to tailored testing. Psychometrika, 42, 375–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clogg, C. C. (1979). Some latent structure models for the analysis of Likert-type data. Social Science Research, 8, 287–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clogg, C. C. (1981a). Latent structure models of mobility. American Journal of Sociology, 86, 836–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clogg, C. C. (1981b). New developments in latent structure analysis. In D. M. Jackson and E. F. Borgatta (Eds.), Factor analysis and measurement in sociological research (pp. 214–280 ). Beverly Hills, California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clogg, C. C. (1982). Some models for the analysis of association in multi-way cross-classifications having ordered categories. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77, 803–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clogg, C. C. (1984). Some statistical models for analyzing why surveys disagree. In C. F. Turner and E. Margin (Eds.), Surveying subjective phenomena (Vol. 2, pp. 319–366 ). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clogg, C. C., and Goodman, L. A. (1984). Latent structure analysis of a set of multidimensional contingency tables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 762–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clogg, C. C., and Goodman, L. A. (1985). Simultaneous latent structure analysis in several groups. In N. B. Tuma (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1985 (pp. 81–110 ). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clogg, C. C., and Goodman, L. A. (1986). On scaling models applied to data from several groups. Psychometrika, 51, 123–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clogg, C. C., and Sawyer, D. O. (1981). A comparison of alternative models for analyzing the scalability of response patterns. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1981 (pp. 240–280 ). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clogg, C. C., and Shockey, J. W. (1987). Multivariate analysis of discrete data. In J. R. Nesselroade and R. B. Cattell (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, W. G. (1983). Planning and analysis of observational studies. New York: Wiley. Dayton, C. M., and Macready, G. A. (1980). A scaling model with response errors and intrinsically unscalable respondents. Psychometrika, 45, 343–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, O. D. (1984). Rasch measurement: Further examples and discussion. In C. F. Turner and E. Martin (Eds.), Surveying subjective phenomena (Vol. 2, pp. 367–403 ). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fienberg, S. E. (1980). The analysis of cross-classified categorical data ( 2nd ed. ). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, A. K. (1984). Die Latent-Class-Analyse. Weinheim and Basel: Beltz Verlag. Forman, A. K. (1985). Constrained latent class models: Theory and applications. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38, 87–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. A. (1974a). The analysis of systems of qualitative variables when some of the variables are unobservable: Part I. A modified latent structure approach. American Journal of Sociology, 79, 1179–1259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. A. (1974b). Exploratory latent structure analysis using both identifiable and unidentifiable models. Biometrika, 61, 215–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. A. (1975). A new model for scaling response patterns: An application of the quasi-independence concept. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 755–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. A. (1978). Analyzing qualitative/ categorical data. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. A. (1979). Simple models for the analysis of association in cross-classifications having ordered categories. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 537–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. A. (1984). The analysis of cross-classifications having ordered categories. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. (1950). The basis for scalogram analysis. In S. A. Stouffer, L. Guttman, E. A. Suchman, P F Lazarsfeld, S. A. Star, and J. A. Clausen (Eds.), Measurement and prediction: Studies in social psychology in World War II (Vol. 4, pp. 60–90 ). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberman, S. J. (1974). Log-linear models for frequency tables with ordered classifications. Biometrics, 30, 589–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haberman, S. J. (1979). Analysis of qualitative data: Vol. 2. New developments. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K. G., and Sorbom, D. (1979). Advances in factor analysis and structural equation models. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelderman, H. (1984). Loglinear Rasch model tests. Psychometrika, 49, 223–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawley, D. N., and Maxwell, A. E. (1967). Factor analysis as a statistical method ( 2nd ed. ). New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P. F., and Henry, N. W. (1968). Latent structure analysis. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, G. N. (1985). A comparison of latent trait and latent class analyses of Likert-type data. Psychometrika, 50, 69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCutcheon, A. L. (1985). A latent class analysis of tolerance for nonconformity in the American public. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49, 474–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooijaart, A. (1982). Latent structure analysis for categorical variables. In K. G. Joreskog and H. Wold (Eds.), Systems under indirect observation. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthen, B. (1979). A structural probit model with latent variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 807–811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, C. A. (1970). A probabilistic formulation and statistical analysis of Guttman scaling. Psychometrika, 44, 421–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, G. (1966). An individualistic approach to item analysis. In P. F. Lazarsfeld and N. W. Henry (Eds.), Readings in mathematical social science. Chicago: Science Research Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, G. (1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests ( 2nd ed. ). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1960 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rindskopf, D. (1983). A general framework for using latent class analysis to test hierarchical and nonhierarchical learning models. Psychometrika, 48, 85–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuman, H., and Presser, S. (1984). The assessment of “no opinion” in attitude surveys. In K. F. Schuessler (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1979 (pp. 241–275 ). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjur, T. (1982). A connection between Rasch’s item analysis model and a multiplicative Poisson model. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 9, 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Clogg, C.C. (1988). Latent Class Models for Measuring. In: Langeheine, R., Rost, J. (eds) Latent Trait and Latent Class Models. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5644-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5644-9_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-5646-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-5644-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics