Skip to main content

Test Bias and the Assessment of Intelligence and Personality

  • Chapter
International Handbook of Personality and Intelligence

Part of the book series: Perspectives on Individual Differences ((PIDF))

Abstract

The issues of bias in psychological testing have been a source of intense and recurring social controversy throughout the history of mental measurement. In the United States, discussions pertaining to test bias are frequently accompanied by emotionally laden polemics decrying the use of mental tests with any minority group member, because ethnic minorities have not been exposed to the cultural and environmental circumstances and values of the white middle class. Intertwined within the general issue of bias in tests has been the more specific question of whether intelligence tests should be used for educational purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alley, G., and Foster, C. (1978). Nondiscriminatory testing of minority and exceptional children. Focus on Exceptional Children, 9, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anastasi, A. (1982). Psychological testing ( 5th ed. ). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angoff, W. H. (1976). Group membership as a predictor variable: A comment on McNemar. American Psychologist, 31, 612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angoff, W. H., and Ford, S. R. (1973). Item-race interaction on a test of scholastic aptitude. Journal of Educational Measurement, 10, 95–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, A. R. (1976). The “equal risk” model: A comment on McNemar. American Psychologist, 31, 611–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernal, E. M. (1975). A response to “Educational uses of tests with disadvantaged students.” American Psychologist, 30, 93–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, H. G., and Gussow, J. D. (1970). Disadvantaged children: Health, nutrition, and school failure. New York: Grune and Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaha, J., Wallbrown, F., and Wherry, R. J. (1975). The hierarchical factor structure of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. Psychological Reports, 35, 771–778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossard, M., Reynolds, C. R., and Gutkin, T. B. (1980). A regression analysis of test bias on the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 9, 52–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, C. (1921). Mental and scholastic tests. London: King. Cardall, C., and Coffman, W. E. (1964). A method of comparing the performance of different groups on the items in a test (RB-64–61). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1979). Are culture fair intelligence tests possible and necessary? Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12, 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, J. S., Barron, F., and Sprecher, J. W. (1980). Identifying gifted Mexican-American students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 24, 123–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinn, P. C. (1979). The exceptional minority child: Issues and some answers. Exceptional Children, 46, 532–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, T. A. (1968). Test bias: Prediction of grades of negro and white students in integrated universities. Journal of Educational Measurement, 5, 118–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, T. A., Humphreys, L. G., Kendrick, S. A., and Wesman, A. (1975). Educational uses of tests with disadvantaged students. American Psychologist, 30, 15–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, N. S., and Moss, P. (1989). Bias in test use. In R. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement ( 3rd ed. ). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council for Exceptional Children. (1978). Minorities position policy statements. Exceptional Children, 45, 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1976). Equity in selection-where psychometrics and political philosophy meet. Journal of Educational Measurement, 13, 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, R. B. (1978). Cultural test bias: Comments on Hunter and Schmidt. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 673–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, R. S. (1977). Reliability of the WISC-R with Mexican-American children. Journal of School Psychology, 15, 267–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, R. S. (1979). WISC-R factor structure for Anglo and Hispanic children. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFries, J. C., Vandenberg, S. G., McCleam, G. E., Kuse, A. R., Wilson, J. R., Ashton, G. C., and Johnson, R. C. (1974). Near identity of cognitive structure in two ethnic groups. Science, 183, 338–339.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ebel, R. L. (1979). Intelligence: A skeptical view. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12, 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eells, K., Davis, A., Havighurst, R. J., Herrick, V. E., and Tyler, R. W. (1951). Intelligence and cultural differences: A study of cultural learning and problem-solving. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einhorn, H. J., and Bass, A. R. (1971). Methodological considerations relevant to discrimination in employment testing. Psychological Bulletin, 75, 261–269.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, B. (1975). The stranglehold of the IQ. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flaugher, R. L. (1978). The many definitions of test bias. American Psychologist, 33, 671–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flaugher, R. L., and Schrader, W. B. (1978). Eliminating differentially difficult items as an approach to test bias (RB-78–4). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frame, R. ( 1979, September). Diagnoses related to school achievement, client’s race, and socioeconomic status. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, F. N. (1923). A referendum of psychologists. Century Illustrated Magazine, 107, 237–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. A. (1984). Digits backward and the Mercer-Kamin law: An empirical response to Mercer’s treatment of internal validity of IQ tests. In C. R. Reynolds and R. T. Brown (Eds.), Perspectives on bias in mental testing. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New York: Norton. Gross, A. L., and Su, W. (1975). Defining a “fair” or “unbiased” selection model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 345–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guterman, S. S. (1979). IQ tests in research on social stratification: The cross-class validity of the test as measures on scholastic aptitude. Sociology of Education, 52, 163–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutkin, T. B., and Reynolds, C. R. (1980). Factorial similarity of the WISC-R for Anglos and Chicanos referred for psychological services. Journal of School Psychology, 18, 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutkin, T. B., and Reynolds, C. R. (1981). Factorial similarity of the WISC-R for white and black children from the standardization sample. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 227–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammill, D. (1991). Detroit tests of learning aptitude ( 3rd ed. ). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, H. (1976). Modern factor analysis ( 2nd ed. ). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, G. M. (1975). Intelligence tests may favor the majority groups in a population. Nature, 258, 708–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, G. M. ( 1976, September). Minority test bias as a psychometric artifact: The experimental evidence. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartlage, L. C., Lucas, T., and Godwin, A. (1976). Culturally biased and culturally fair tests correlated with school performance in culturally disadvantaged children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 32, 325–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilliard, A. G. (1979). Standardization and cultural bias as impediments to the scientific study and validation of “intelligence.” Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12, 47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, L. G. (1973). Statistical definitions of test validity for minority groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 58, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J. E., and Schmidt, F. L. (1976). Critical analysis of the statistical and ethical implications of various definitions of test bias. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 1053–1071.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., and Hunter, R. (1979). Differential validity of employment tests by race: A comprehensive review and analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 721–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., and Rauschenberger, J. (1984). Methodological, statistical, and ethical issues in the study of bias in psychological tests. In C. R. Reynolds and R. T. Brown (Eds.), Perspectives on bias in mental testing. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, G. D. (1975). Another psychological view from the Association of Black Psychologists. American Psychologist, 30, 88–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. R. (1974). How biased are cultural loaded tests? Genetic Psychology Monographs, 90, 185–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. R. (1976). Test bias and construct validity. Phi Delta Kappan, 58, 340–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. R. (1977). An examination of culture bias in the Wonderlic Personnel test. Intelligence, 1, 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. R. (1985). The nature of the black-white difference on various tests: Spearman’s hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 193–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. R., and Figueroa, R. (1975). Forward and backward digit span interaction with race and IQ. Journal of Education Psychology, 67, 882–893.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joreskof, K. (1971). Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika, 30, 409–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, S. (1986). Ability patterns of black and white adults on the WAIS-R independent of general intelligence and as a function of socioeconomic status. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas A and M University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamphaus, R. W., and Reynolds, C. R. (1987). Clinical and research applications of the K-ABC. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, A. S. (1973). Comparison of the performance of matched groups of black children and white children on the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 41, 186–191. Kaufman, A. S. (1979). Intelligent testing with the WISC-R. New York: Wiley-Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, A. S., and DiCiuo, R. (1975). Separate factor analyses of the McCarthy Scales for groups of black and white children. Journal of School Psychology, 13, 10–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, A. S., and Hollenbeck, G. P. (1974). Comparative structure of the WPPSI for black and whites. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 30, 316–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, A. S., and Kaufman, N. L. (1973). Black-white differences on the McCarthy Scales of Children’s Abilities. Journal of School Psychology, 11, 196–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, A. S., and Kaufman, N. L. (1983). Kaufman assessment battery for children. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, N. M. ( 1979, October). Adaptive behavior assessment and its implications for educational programming. Paper presented to the Fourth Annual Midwestern Conference on Psychology in the Schools, Boys Town, NE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larry P. et al. v Wilson Riles et al.,C 71 2270 (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, October 1979, slip opinion).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. C. (1970). Race and intelligence. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 26, 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, R. L. (1976). In search of fair selection procedures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 13, 53–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, R. L., and Werts, C. E. (1971). Considerations for studies of test bias. Journal of Educational Measurement, 8, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippmann, W. (1923a). A judgment of the tests. New Republic, 34, 322–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippmann, W. (1923b). Mr. Burt and the intelligence tests. New Republic, 34, 263–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loehlin, J. C., Lindzey, G., and Spuhler, J. N. (1975). Race differences in intelligence. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matuszek, P., and Oakland, T. (1979). Factors influencing teachers’ and psychologists’ recommendations regarding special class placement. Journal of School Psychology, 17, 116–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, D. (1972). McCarthy Scales of Children’s Abilities. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGurk, E V. J. (1951). Comparison of the performance of negro and white high school seniors on cultural and noncultural psychological test questions. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNemar, Q. (1975). On so-called test bias. American Psychologist, 30, 848–851.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, J. R. ( 1976, August). Cultural diversity, mental retardation, and assessment: The case for nonlabeling. Paper presented to the Fourth International Congress of the International Association for the Scientific Study of Mental Retardation, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merz, W. R. (1970). A factor analysis of the Goodenough-Harris drawing test across four ethnic groups. Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan. University Microfilms #70–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mille, F. (1979). Cultural bias in the WISC. Intelligence, 3, 149–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, M. (1990). The problem of cultural bias in personality assessment. In C. R. Reynolds and R. W. Kamphaus (Eds.), Handbook of psychological and educational assessment of children (Vol. 2, pp. 491–523 ). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, R. C. (1978). Policy implications of the IQ controversy. In L. S. Schulman (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 6 ). Itasca, IL: Peacock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novick, M. R., and Petersen, N. S. (1976). Towards equalizing educational and employment opportunity. Journal of Educational Measurement, 13, 77–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakland, T., and Feigenbaum, D. (1979). Multiple sources of test bias on the Bender-Gestalt and the WISC-R. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 968–974.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Conner, E. J., Wexley, K. N., and Alexander, R. A. (1975). Single group validity: Fact or fallacy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 352–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parents in Action on Special Education et al. v. Hannon et al., No. 74 C 3586 (United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, July 1980, slip opinion).

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, N. S, and Novick, M. R. (1976). An evaluation of some models for culture fair selection. Journal of Educational Measurement, 13, 3–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintner, R. (1931). Intelligence testing. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potthoff, R. F. (1966). Statistical aspects of the problem of biases in psychological tests (Institute of statistics Mimco Series No. 479 ). Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina, Department of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, R. T. (1979). The testing manual: A guide to test administration and use. Pittsburgh: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reschly, D. J. (1978). Concepts of bias in assessment and WISCR research with minorities. In H. Vance and F. Wallbrown (Eds.), WISC-R: Research and interpretation. Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reschly, D. J. (1980). School psychologists and assessment in the future. Professional Psychology, 11, 841–848.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reschly, D. J., and Reschly, J. E. (1979). Validity of the WISC-R factor scores in predicting achievement and attention for four sociocultural groups. Journal of School Psychology, 17, 355–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reschly, D. J., and Sabers, D. (1979). Analysis of test bias with the regression definition. Journal of Educational Measurement, 16, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R. (1978). Differential validity of several preschool assessment instruments for blacks, whites, males, and females. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R. (1979). Should we screen preschoolers? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 4, 175–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R. (1980a). Differential construct validity of intelligence as popularly measured: Correlation of age and raw scores on the WISC-R for blacks, whites, males, and females. Intelligence: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 4, 371–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R. (1980b). An examination for test bias in a preschool battery across race and sex. Journal of Educational Measurement, 17, 137–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R. (1980c). In support of “Bias in Mental Testing” and scientific inquiry. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R. (1982a). Construct and predictive bias. In R. A. Berk (Ed.), Handbook of methods for detecting test bias. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R. (1982b). The problem of bias in psychological assessment. In C. R. Reynolds and T. B. Gutkin (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R., and Bigler, E. D. (1994). Test of memory and learning. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R., and Brown, R. T. (1984). Bias in mental testing: An introduction to the issues. In C. R. Reynolds and R. T. Brown (Eds.), Perspectives on bias in mental testing (pp. 1–39 ). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R., and Gutkin, T. B. (1980a). A regression analysis of test bias on the WISC-R for Anglos and Chicanos referred for psychological services. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 48, 868–879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R., and Gutkin, T. B. ( 1980b, September). WISC-R performance of blacks and whites matched on four demographic variables. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R., and Gutkin, T. B. (1981). A multivariate comparison of the intellectual performance of blacks and whites matched on four demographic variables. Personality and Individual Differences, 2, 175–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R., Gutkin, T. B., Dappen, L., and Wright, D. (1979). Differential validity of the WISC-R for boys and for girls referred to psychological services. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 48, 868–879.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R., and Harding, R. E. (1983): Outcome in two large sample studies of factorial similarity under six methods of comparison. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 43, 723–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R., and Hartlage, L. C. (1979). Comparison of WISC and WISC-R regression lines for academic prediction with black and white referred children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 589–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R., and Jensen, A. R. ( 1983, September). Patterns of intellectual performance among blacks and whites matched on “g ”. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R., and Kaiser, S. (1990). Test bias in psychological assessment. In T. B. Gutkin and C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology ( 2nd ed., pp. 487–525 ). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R., and Kamphaus, R. W. (1993). Behavior Assessment System for Children. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R., and Paget, K. (1981). Factor analysis of the revised Children’s Manifest Anxiety Scale for blacks, whites, males, and females with a national normative sample. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 349–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R., Willson, V. L., and Chatman, S. P. (1984). Item bias on the 1981 revision of the Peabody Vocabulary Test using a new technique for detecting bias. Journal of Psycho-educational Assessment, 2, 219–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R., Willson, V. L., and Chatman, S. P. (1985). Regression analyses of bias on the K-ABC. Journal of School Psychology, 23, 195–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandoval, J. (1979). The WISC-R and internal evidence of test bias with minority group children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 919–927.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandoval, J., and Mille, M. ( 1979, September). Accuracy judgments of WISC-R item difficulty for minority groups. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. L., Cole, N. S., and Cole, J. W. (1976). Utilities and the issue of fairness in a decision theoretic model for selection. Journal of Educational Measurement, 13, 59–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheuneman, J. D. (1987). An experimental, exploratory study of causes of bias in test items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29, 97–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F. L., and Hunter, J. E. (1974). Racial and ethnic bias in psychological tests: Divergent implications of two definitions of test bias. American Psychologist, 29, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, W. N. (1974). Notes on a bit of psychological nonsense: “Race differences in intelligence.” Psychological Record, 24, 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholwinski, E. (1985). Ability patterns of black and white adults as determined by the subscales of the WAIS-R. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas A and M University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semler, I., and Iscoe, I. (1966). Structure of intelligence in Negro and white children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 57, 326–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, T. E. (1979). Intelligence and learning tasks as predictors of achievement for black and white first grade children. Journal of School Psychology, 17, 325–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, L. S. (1982). Definitions of bias. In R. A. Berk (Ed.), Handbook of methods for detecting test bias. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuey, A. M. (1966). The testing of Negro intelligence ( 2nd ed. ). New York: Social Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, A. R. (1973). Factor structure of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children for three ethnic groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 408–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1980). Intelligence and test bias: Art and science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 353–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomdike, R. L. (1971). Concepts of culture-fairness. Journal of Educational Measurement, 8, 63–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tittle, C. K. (1982). Use of judgmental methods in item bias studies. In R. A. Berk (Ed.), Handbook of methods for detecting test bias. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, J. R., Acker, N., Canter, A., and Lindborg, S. (1977). Minority status, sex, and school psychological services. Psychology in the Schools, 14, 456–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1980). Psychology of gifted children and youth. In W. M. Cruickshank (Ed.), Psychology of exceptional children and youth. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, L. E. (1965). The psychology of human differences. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance, H. B., Huelsman, C. B., and Wherry, R. J. (1976). The hierarchical factor structure of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children as it relates to disadvantaged black and white children. Journal of General Psychology, 95, 287–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance, H. B., and Wallbrown, F. H. (1978). The structure of intelligence for black children: A hierarchical approach. Psychological Record, 28, 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veale, J. R., and Foreman, D. I. (1983). Assessing cultural bias using foil response data: Cultural variation. Journal of Educational Measurement, 20, 249–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waits, C., and Richmond, B. O. (1978). Special education-who needs it? Exceptional Children, 44, 279–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallbrown, F. H., Blaha, J., and Wherry, R. J. (1973). The hierarchical factor structure of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 44, 47–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1975). Intelligence defined and undefined: A rela- tivistic appraisal. American Psychologist, 30, 135–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wherry, R. J., and Wherry, R. J., Jr. (1969). WNEWH program. In R. J. Wherry (Ed.), Psychology department computer program (pp.). Columbus: Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willerman, L. (1979). The psychology of individual and group differences. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. L. (1970). Danger: Testing and dehumanizing black children. Clinical Child Psychology Newsletter, 9, 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. L. (1974). From dehumanization to black intellectual genocide: A rejoinder. In G. J. Williams and S. Gordon (Eds.), Clinical child psychology: Current practices and future perspectives. New York: Behavioral Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, B. J., and Isenstein, V. R. (1977). Psychological tests and minorities (DHEW Publication No. ADM 78–482 ). Rockville, MD: National Institute for Mental Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeidner, M. (1990). Does test anxiety bias scholastic aptitude test performance by gender and sociocultural group? Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 145–160.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reynolds, C.R. (1995). Test Bias and the Assessment of Intelligence and Personality. In: Saklofske, D.H., Zeidner, M. (eds) International Handbook of Personality and Intelligence. Perspectives on Individual Differences. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5571-8_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5571-8_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3239-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-5571-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics