Skip to main content

Constructing Personality and Intelligence Instruments

Methods and Issues

  • Chapter
International Handbook of Personality and Intelligence

Part of the book series: Perspectives on Individual Differences ((PIDF))

Abstract

The goal of this chapter is to describe methods for developing personality and intelligence measures. By comparing and contrasting the two constructs and how we assess them, we are able to see points of similarity and difference that relate to developing instruments in these two domains. We also want to be very practical and discuss the issues involved in developing personality or intelligence instruments. We will walk through the instrument development process step by step and examine different methods for approaching each step.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ackerman, P. L., & Humphreys, L. G. (1990). Individual differences theory in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd Ed., Vol. 1, pp. 223282 ). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), & National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME). (1985). Standards for educational and psychological tests and manuals. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anastasi, A. (1986). Evolving concepts of test validation. Annual Review of Psychology, 37, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anastasi, A. (1990). Psychological Testing ( 6th ed. ). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angleitner, A., John, O. P., & Löhr, F. J. (1986). It’s what you ask and how you ask it: An itemmetric analysis of personality questionnaires. In A. Angleitner & J. S. Wiggins (Eds.). Personality assessment via questionnaires: Current issues in theory and measurement (pp. 61–107 ). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J. (1982). Personality and intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.). Handbook of human intelligence (pp. 308–351 ). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, J. (1977). Advancing the psychology of personality: Paradigmatic shift or improving the quality of research? In D. Magnussen & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology (pp. 3763 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Craik, K. H. (1983a). The act frequency approach to personality. Psychological Review, 90 (2), 105–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Craik, K. H. (19836). Act prediction and the conceptual analysis of personality scales: Indices of act density, bipolarity, and extensity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(5),1081–1095.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, H. J. (1968). Human intelligence: Its nature and assessment. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B. (1992). Cognitive abilities: The state of the art. Psychological Science, 3, 266–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1943). The description of personality: Basic traits resolved into cluster. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38, 476–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: Their structure, growth and action. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. J., Montague, P., Nathanson, L. S., & Swerdlik, M. E. (1988). Psychological testing: An introduction to tests and measurement. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Professional Standards (COPS), & Committee on Psychological Tests and Assessment (CPTA). (1986). Guidelines for computer-based tests and interpretations. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1986). Personality stability and its implications for clinical psychology. Clinical Psychology Review, 1, 144–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik, K. H. ( 1991, August). The lived day of an individual: A person environment perspective. Invited address to the Division of Population and Environmental Psychology at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association in San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: CBS College Publications. Cronbach, L. J. (1984). Essentials of psychological testing (4th ed.). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Rajaratnam, N., & Nanda, H. (1912). The dependability of behavioral measurements: Theory of generalizability for scores and profiles. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dancer, L. S. (1985). On the multidimensional structure of self-esteem: Facet analysis of Rosenberg’s self-esteem scale. In D. Canter (Ed.), Facet theory: Approaches to social research (pp. 223–236 ). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Das, J. P. (1973). Cultural deprivation and cognitive competence. In N. R. Ellis (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation (Vol. 6, pp. 1–53 ). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1985). Personality and individual differences. New York: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1992). Assessment in context: The alternative to standardized testing. In B. R. Gifford & M. C. O’Conner (Eds.), Changing assessments: Alternative views of aptitude, achievement, and instruction (pp. 77–119 ). Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H., & Hatch, T. (1989). Multiple intelligences go to school. Educational Researcher, 18, 4–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1982). From ace to zombie: Some explorations in the language of personality. In C. D. Spielberger & J. N. Butcher (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 1, pp. 203–234 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golden, C. J., Sawicki, R. F., & Franzen, M. D. (1984). Test construction. In G. Goldstein & M. Hersen (Eds.), Handbook of psychological assessment (pp. 19–37). New York: Pergamon. Goldstein, I. L. (1993). Training in organizations: Needs assessment, development, and evaluation ( 3rd ed. ), Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, H. G. (1965). Conceptual analysis of psychological test scores and other diagnostic variables. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 70 (4), 294–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, H. G. (1987). California Psychological Inventory administrator’s guide. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, H. G., & Bradley, P. (1992). Comparing two strategies for developing personality scales. In M. Zeidner & R. Most (Eds.), Psychological testing: An inside view (pp. 215–246 ). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gridley, B. E. (1987). Measuring adult intelligence. In R. S. Dean (Ed.), Introduction to assessing human intelligence (pp. 117–139 ). Springfield, IL: Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1959). Three faces of intellect. American Psychologists, 14, 469–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. (1969). Integration of test design and analysis. In Proceedings of the 1969 Invitational Conference on Testing Problems (pp. 53–65 ). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L., & Levy; S. (1980). Two structural laws for intelligence. Megamot, 25, 421–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L., & Levy, S. (1991). Two structural laws for intelligence. Intelligence, 15, 79–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh, S. K., & Kummerow, J. M. (1990). Introduction to type in organizations. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. Hogan, R., & Nicholsen, R. A. (1988). The meaning of person ality test scores. American Psychologist, 43, 621–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R. T. (1991). Personality and personality measurement. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 873–919 ). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holman, R. H. (1984). A values and lifestyles perspective on human behavior. In R. E. Pitts & A. G. Woodside (Eds.), Personal values and consumer psychology (pp. 35–54 ). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J. L. (1979). Trends in the measurement of intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg & K. K. Detterman (Eds.), Human intelligence (pp. 191–200 ). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, L. M. (1992). The “big five” personality variables-construct confusion: Description vs. prediction. Human Performance, 5(1 & 2 ), 139–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: Free press.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, O. P. (1990). The “big five” factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 66–100 ). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L. V., & Applebaum, M. I. (1989). Psychometric methods. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 23–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. T. (1992). An argument-based approach to validity. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 527–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenrick, D. T., & Funder, D. C. (1988). Profiting from controversy: Lessons from the person-situation debate. American Psychologist, 43, 23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinmuntz, B. (1982). Personality and psychological assessment. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, P. (1986). A handbook of test construction. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, P. (1991). Intelligence: The psychometric view. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krechevsky, M., & Gardner, H. (1991). The emergence and nurturance of multiple intelligences: The Project Spectrum approach. In M. J. A. Howe (Ed.). Encouraging the development of exceptional skills and talents (pp. 222–245 ). Leicester, England: British Psychological Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loevinger, J. (1957). Objective tests as instruments of psychological theory. Psychological Reports, 3, 635–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, E M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Matarazzo, J. D. (1972). Measurement and appraisal of adult intelligence (5th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins. McAllister, L. W. (1988). A practical guide to CPI interpretation (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258–1265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). New York: Macmillan. Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreland, K. L. (1992). Computer-assisted psychological assessment. In M. Zeidner & R. Most (Eds.), Psychological testing: An inside view (pp. 343–376 ). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, I. B. (1987). Introduction to type. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevo, B. (1990). The construction of an intelligence test based on the two-faceted model. Psychologia, 2, 12–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574–583.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, G. J. (1992). Psychological tests: Development, publication, and distribution. In M. Zeidner & R. Most (Eds.), Psychological testing: An inside view (pp. 159–214 ). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothlisberg, B. A. (1987). Assessing learning problems: How to proceed once you know the score. In R. S. Dean (Ed.), Introduction to assessing human intelligence (pp. 207–229 ). Springfield, IL: Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sattler, J. M. (1988). Assessment of children ( 3rd ed. ). San Diego, Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarr, S. (1981). Testing for children: Assessment and the many determinants of intellectual competence. American Psychologist 36 1159–1166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, I. M., & Guttman, L. (1969). Smallest space analysis of intellectual and achievement tests. Psychological Bulletin 71, 95–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, W. C. (1966). The interpersonal underworld. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. C. (1976). Behaviors, results, and organizational effectiveness: The problem of criteria. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 745–775 ). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, R. E. (1991). The concept of aptitude. In R. E. Snow & D. E. Wiley (Eds.), Improving inquiry in social science: A volume in honor of Lee J. Cronbach (pp. 249–284 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. E. (1923). The nature of intelligence and the principles of cognition. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E. (1992). Summated rating scale construction: An introduction. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D. (1983). Manual for the Strait-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. Sternberg, R. J. (1985).Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press. Sternberg, R. J. (in press). Ability tests, measurements, and markets. Journal of Educational Psychology. Sternberg, R. J., Conway, B. E., Ketron, J. L., & Bernstein, M. (1981). People’s conceptions of intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 4137–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strelau, J., & Angleitner, A. (1991). Explorations in temperament: International perspectives on theory and measurement. London: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg, N. D. (1977). Assessment of persons. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomdike, E. I., Bregnan, E.O., Cobb, M. V., & Woodyard, E. (1926). The measurement of intelligence. New York: Teachers College Bureau of Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, R. L. (1982). Applied psychometrics. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trickett, E. J., & Moos, R. H. (1970). Generally and specificity of student reactions in high school classrooms. Adolescence, 5, 373–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, B., & Miller, K. (1986). The use of tests by psychologists: Report on a survey of BPS members. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 39, 405–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1944). The measurement of adult intelligence ( 3rd ed. ). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Willerman, L. (1979). The psychology of individual and group differences. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeidner, M., & Most, R. (1992). An introduction to psychological testing. In M. Zeidner & R. Most (Eds.), Psychological testing: An inside view (pp. 2–47 ). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Most, R.B., Zeidner, M. (1995). Constructing Personality and Intelligence Instruments. In: Saklofske, D.H., Zeidner, M. (eds) International Handbook of Personality and Intelligence. Perspectives on Individual Differences. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5571-8_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5571-8_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3239-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-5571-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics