Creativity as a Product of Intelligence and Personality

  • Hans J. Eysenck
Chapter
Part of the Perspectives on Individual Differences book series (PIDF)

Abstract

Creativity has always been a problem in the well-tended garden of cognitive ability, and though its empirical study has flourished, a recent handbook (Glover, Ronning, & Reynolds, 1989) has characterized it as “a large-scale example of a ‘degenerating’ research program” (p. xi). The reasons for such a disparaging estimate are not hard to find: Research in this area has been largely descriptive, full of anecdotal evidence, and without close links with the two disciplines of scientific psychology (Cronbach, 1957)—the experimental and the psychometric. Admittedly there have been many attempts to measure creativity along psychometric lines (Runco, 1991), but these have not been linked theoretically or experimentally with the large body of the psychological literature, and thus they have remained resolutely isolated.

Keywords

Latent Inhibition Negative Priming Word Association Negative Priming Effect Formal Thought Disorder 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allport, F. H. (1934). The J-curve hypothesis of conforming behavior. Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 141–143.Google Scholar
  2. Allsop, J., Eysenck, H. J., and Eysenck, S. (1991). Machiavellianism as a component in psychoticism and extraversion. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 29–41.Google Scholar
  3. Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  4. Andreasen, N. C. (1987). Creativity and mental illness: Prevalence rates in writers and their first-degree relatives. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1288–1292.Google Scholar
  5. Barron, F. (1968). Creativity and psychological health. New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  6. Baruch, I., Hemsley, D. R., and Gray, J. (1988). Differential performance of acute and chronic schizophrenics in a latent inhibition task. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 170, 598–606.Google Scholar
  7. Beech, A. R., Baylis, G. C., Smithson, P., and Claridge, G. S. (1989). Individual differences in schizotypy as reflected in cognitive measures of inhibition. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 28, 117–129.Google Scholar
  8. Beech, A. R., and Claridge, G. S. (1987). Individual differences in cognitive priming: Relation with schizotypal personality traits. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 78, 349–356.Google Scholar
  9. Beech, A. R., McManus, D., Baylis, G. S., Tipper, S. P., and Agar, K. (1991). Individual differences in cognitive processes: Towards an explanation of schizophrenic symptomatology. British Journal of Psychology, 82, 417–426.Google Scholar
  10. Beech, A. R., Powell, T., McWilliam, J., and Claridge, G. (1989). Evidence of reduced cognitive inhibition in schizophrenia. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 109–116.Google Scholar
  11. Beech, A. R., Powell, T., McWilliam, J., and Claridge, G. (1990). The effect of a small dose of chlorpromazine as a measure of cognitive inhibition. Personality and Individual Differences, 43x, 1141–1145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Benassy, M., and Chauffard, C. (1947). Le test F de Cattell est-il un test objectif de temperament? L’Annee Psychologique, 43, 200–230.Google Scholar
  13. Bingham, M. T. (1953). Beyond psychology. In M. T. Bingham (Ed.), Homosapiens auduboniensis: A tribute to Walter van Dyke Bingham (pp. 5–29 ). New York: National Audubon Society.Google Scholar
  14. Braff, D. L., and Saccuzzo, D. P. (1982). Effects of antipsychotic medication on speed of information processing in schizophrenic patients. American Journal of Psychiatry, 139, 1127–1130.Google Scholar
  15. Bullen, J. G., and Hemsley, D. R. (1986). Schizophrenia: A failure to control the content of consciousness. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 26, 25–33.Google Scholar
  16. Cameron, N. (1939). Deterioration and regression in schizophrenic thinking. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 34, 265–270.Google Scholar
  17. Cameron, N. (1947). The psychology of behavior disorders. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  18. Cameron, N., and Magaret, A. (1950). Experimental studies in thinking: I. Scattered speed in the response of normal subjects to incomplete sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 617–627.Google Scholar
  19. Cameron, N., and Magaret, A. (1951). Behavior pathology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  20. Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380–400.Google Scholar
  21. Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: Their structure, growth, and action. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  22. Chapman, J. (1956). Distractibility in the conceptual performance of schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 53, 286–291.Google Scholar
  23. Chapman, L. J., and Chapman, J. P. (1980). Scales for rating psychotic and psychotic-like experiences as continua. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 6, 476–489.Google Scholar
  24. Chapman, L. J., and Taylor, J. (1957). Breadth of deviate concepts used by schizophrenics. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 54,108–123.Google Scholar
  25. Cronbach, L. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671–684.Google Scholar
  26. Crow, T. J. (1986). The continuum of psychosis and its implication for the structure of the gene. British Journal of Psychiatry, 179, 419–429.Google Scholar
  27. Crow, T. J. (1990). The continuum of psychosis and its genetic origins. British Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 788–797.Google Scholar
  28. Dahlstrom, W. G., Lachar, D., and Dahlstrom, L. (1986). MMPI patterns of American minorities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  29. Dellas, M., and Gaier, E. L. (1970). Identification of creativity: The individual. Psychological Bulletin, 73, 55–73.Google Scholar
  30. Dentier, R. A., and Mackler, B. (1964). Originality: Some social and personal determinants. Behavioral Science, 9, 1–7.Google Scholar
  31. Dykes, M., and McGhie, A. (1976). A comparative study of attentional strategies of schizophrenic and highly normal subjects. British Journal of Psychiatry, 128, 509–56.Google Scholar
  32. Easterbrook, J. A. (1959). The effect of emotion as cue utilization of behavior. Psychological Review, 66, 183–201.Google Scholar
  33. Epstein, S. (1953). Overinclusive thinking in schizophrenics and a control group. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 17, 384–388.Google Scholar
  34. Eysenck, H. J. (1952). The scientific study of personality. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  35. Eysenck, H. J. (1953). Uses and abuses of psychology. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  36. Eysenck, H. J. (1961). Psychosis, drive and inhibition: A theoretical and experimental account. American Journal of Psychiatry, 118, 198–204.Google Scholar
  37. Eysenck, H. J. (1970). The structure of human personality. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  38. Eysenck, H. J. (1973). Personality, learning and “anxiety.” In H. J. Eysenck (Ed.), Handbook of abnormal psychology (2nd ed., pp. 390–419 ). London: Pitman.Google Scholar
  39. Eysenck, H. J. (1983). The roots of creativity: Cognitive ability or personality trait? Roeper Review, 5,10–12.Google Scholar
  40. Eysenck, H. J. (1987). Personality and aging: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 3, 11–21.Google Scholar
  41. Eysenck, H. J. (1991). Dimensions of personality: 16, 5 or 3-criteria for a taxonomic paradigm. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 773–790.Google Scholar
  42. Eysenck, H. J. (1992a). The definition and measurement of psychoticism. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 757–785.Google Scholar
  43. Eysenck, H. J. (1992b). Four ways five factors are not basic.Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 667–673. Eysenck, H. J. (1993). Creativity and personality: A theoretical perspective. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 147–246.Google Scholar
  44. Eysenck, H. J., and Eysenck, M. W. (1989). Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  45. Eysenck, H. J., and Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
  46. Eysenck, H. J., and Eysenck, S. B. G. (1976). Psychoticism as a dimension of personality. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
  47. Eysenck, H. J., and Frith, L. D. (1977). Reminiscence, motivation and personality. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  48. Eysenck, H. J., and Gudjonsson, G. (1988). The causes and cures of criminality. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  49. Farmer, E. W. (1974). Psychoticism and place-orientation as general personality characteristics of importance for different aspects of creative thinking. Unpublished thesis, University of Glasgow, Scotland.Google Scholar
  50. Frey, P. W., and Sears, R. J. (1978). Model of conditioning incorporating the Rescorda-Wagner associated axiom, a dynamic attention process, and a catastrophe scale. Psychological Review, 85, 321–340.Google Scholar
  51. Friedman, A. F., Webb, J. I., and Lewak, R. (1989). Psychological assessment with the MMPI. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  52. Frith, C. (1979). Consciousness, information processing and schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 225–235.Google Scholar
  53. Furneaux, W. D. (1960). Intellectual abilities and problem-solving behavior. In H. J. Eysenck (Ed.), Handbook of abnormal psychology (pp. 167–192 ). London: Pitman.Google Scholar
  54. Gewirtz, J. L. (1948). Studies in word fluency. I. Its relation to vocabulary and mental age in young children. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 72, 165–176.Google Scholar
  55. Glover, J. A., Ronning, R. R., and Reynolds, C. P. (Eds.). (1989). Handbook of creativity. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  56. Goetz, K. O., and Goetz, K. (1979a). Personality characteristics of professional artists. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 49, 327–334.Google Scholar
  57. Goetz, K. O., and Goetz, K. (1979b). Personality characteristics of successful artists. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 49, 919–924.Google Scholar
  58. Gooding, F., and Jamison, K. (1990). Manic depressive illness.New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Gough, H. C. (1976). Studying creativity by means of Word Association Tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 348–353.Google Scholar
  60. Gray, J. A. (1975). Elements of a two-process theory of learning. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  61. Gray, J. A., Feldon, J., Rawlins, J. N. P., Hemsley, D. R., and Smith, A. D. (1991). The neuropsychology of schizophrenia. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 77–88.Google Scholar
  62. Griffiths, J. J., Mednick, S. I., Schulsinger, E, and Diderichsen, B. (1980). Verbal associative disturbances in children at high risk for schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 89, 125–131.Google Scholar
  63. Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.Google Scholar
  64. Hargreaves. H. L. (1927). The “faculty” of imagination. British Journal of Psychology,10(Monograph Suppl.), 74. Hebeison, A. A. (1960). The performance of groups of schizophrenic patients in a test of creative thinking. In E. P. Torrance (Ed.), Creativity: Third Minnesota Conference on Gifted Children. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  65. Heston, I. I. (1966). Psychiatric disorders in foster-home-reared children of schizophrenic mothers. British Journal of Psychiatry, 112, 819–825.Google Scholar
  66. Hull, C. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: AppletonCentury-Crofts.Google Scholar
  67. Huxley, J., Mayr, E., Hoffer, H., and Osmond, A. (1964). Schizophrenia as a genetic morphism. Nature, 204, 220–221. Karlsson, J. I. (1970). Genetic association of giftedness and creativity with schizophrenia. Heredity, 66, 171–182.Google Scholar
  68. Keele, S. W., and Neill, W. T. (1978). Mechanisms of attention. In E. C. Carberette (Ed.), Handbook of Perception (Vol. 9, pp. 3–47 ). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  69. Kessel, N. (1989). Genius and mental disorder: A history of ideas concerning their conjunction. In P. Murray (Ed.), Genius: The history of ideas (pp. 196–212 ). Oxford, England: Basil Blackford.Google Scholar
  70. Kidner, D. W. (1978). Personality and conceptual structure: An integrative model. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of London, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  71. Krechewsky, D. (1932). “Hypotheses” in rats. Psychological Review, 39, 516–532.Google Scholar
  72. Kris, E. (1952). Psychoanalytic exploration in art. New York: International University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Kubie, L. S. (1958). Neurotic distortions of the creative process. New York: Noon Lay.Google Scholar
  74. Lange-Eichbaum, W. (1931). The problem of genius. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  75. Lashley, K. S. (1929). Brain mechanisms and intelligence: A quantitative study of injuries to the brain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  76. Lawrence, D. N. (1949). Acquired distinctiveness of cues: I. Transfer between disorientations on the basis of familiarity with the stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 770–784.Google Scholar
  77. Lindgren, H. C., and Lindgren, E. (1965). Brainstorming and orneriness as facilitators of creativity. Psychological Reports, 16, 572–583.Google Scholar
  78. Lombroso, C. (1901). The man of genius. (6th ed.). New York: Scribner’s.Google Scholar
  79. Lovibond, S. N. (1954). The Object Sorting Test and conceptual thinking in schizophrenics. Australian Journal of Psychology, 6, 52–70.Google Scholar
  80. Lubow, R. E. (1989). Latent inhibition and conditional attention theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Lubow, R. E., Ingberg-Sacks, Y., Zalstein-Orda, N., and Gewirtz, J. C. (1992). Latent inhibition in low and high “psychotic-prone” normal subjects. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 563–572.Google Scholar
  82. Lubow, R. E., Weiner, I., Schlossberg, A., and Baruch, I. (1987). Latent inhibition and schizophrenia. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 25, 464–467.Google Scholar
  83. Maclntosh, N. J. (1974). The psychology of animal learning. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  84. Macintosh, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Revue, 82, 276–298.Google Scholar
  85. Maclntosh, N. J. (1983). Conditioning and associative learning. Oxford, England: University Press.Google Scholar
  86. MacKinnon, D. W. (1962). The nature and nurture of creative talent. American Psychologist, 17, 484–495.Google Scholar
  87. MacKinnon, D. W. (1965). Personality and the realization of creative potential. American Psychologist, 20, 273–281.Google Scholar
  88. MacKinnon, D. W. (1978). In search of human effectiveness. New York: Creative Education Foundation.Google Scholar
  89. Maddi, S. R., and Andrews, S. (1966). The need for variety in fantasy and self-description. Journal of Personality, 34, 610–625.Google Scholar
  90. Martindale, C. (1981). Cognition and consciousness. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.Google Scholar
  91. Martindale, C. (1989). Personality, situation, and creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, and C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  92. Martindale, C., and Greenough, J. (1973). The differential effect of increased arousal on creative and intellectual performance. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 123, 329–335.Google Scholar
  93. Martindale, C., and Hasenfus, N. (1978). EEG differences as a function of creativity, stage of the creative process, and effort to be original. Biological Psychology, 6, 157–167.Google Scholar
  94. Martindale, C., and Hines, D. C. (1975). Creativity and cortical activation during creative, intellectual, and EEG feedback tasks. Biological Psychology, 3, 71–80.Google Scholar
  95. Marlow, A. C. (1976). Creativity in self-analyzing people. In A Rottenberg and C. R. Haussman (Eds.), The creative question (pp. 86–92 ). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  96. McConaghy, N., and Clancy, M. (1968). Familial relationships of allusive thinking in university students and their parents. British Journal of Psychiatry, 114, 1079–1087.Google Scholar
  97. McNeil, T. F. (1971). Prebirth and postbirth influence on the relationship between creative ability and recorded mental illness. Journal of Personality, 39, 391–406.Google Scholar
  98. Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.Google Scholar
  99. Miller, E. N., and Chapman, L. J. (1983). Continued word association in hypothetically psychosis-prone college students. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 92, 408–478.Google Scholar
  100. Mohan, J. L., and Tiwana, M. (1987). Personality and alienation of creative writers: A brief report. Personality and Individual Differences, 8, 449.Google Scholar
  101. Moran, L. J. (1953). Vocabulary knowledge and usage among normal and schizophrenic subjects. Psychological Monograph, 67 (Whole No. 370).Google Scholar
  102. Neill, W. T. (1977). Inhibitory and facilitatory processes in selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 4.44–450.Google Scholar
  103. Ochse, R. (1991). The relation between creative genius of psychopathology: An historical perspective and a new explanation. South African Journal of Psychology, 21, 45–53.Google Scholar
  104. Oltmans, T. E, Otayan, J., and Neale, J. M. (1978). The effects of antipsychotic medication and diagnostic criteria on distractibility in schizophrenics. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 14, 81–91.Google Scholar
  105. Payne, R. W. (1960). Cognitive abnormalities. In H. J. Eysenck (Ed.), Handbook of abnormal psychology. London: Pitman. Payne, R. W., andGoogle Scholar
  106. Hewlett, J. H. G. (1960). Thought disorder in psychotic patients. In H. J. Eysenck (Ed.), Experiments in personality (pp. 3–104 ). London: Routledge and Kegan PaulGoogle Scholar
  107. Payne, R. W., Matussek, P., and George, E. I. (1959). An experimental study of schizophrenic thought disorder. Journal of Mental Science, 105, 627–652.Google Scholar
  108. Pearce, J. M., and Hall, G. (1980). A model of Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 532–552.Google Scholar
  109. Power, M. J. (1991). Cognitive science and behavioral psychotherapy: Where behaviour was, there shall co-operation be? Behavioral Psychotherapy, 19, 20–41.Google Scholar
  110. Prentky, R. A. (1980). Creativity and psychopathology. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  111. Rapaport, D. (1945). Diagnostic clinical testing. Chicago: Year Book.Google Scholar
  112. Rawlings, D. (1985). Psychoticism, creativity and dichotic shadowing. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 737–742.Google Scholar
  113. Richards, R. L. (1981). Relationships between creativity and psychopathology: An evaluation and interpretation of the evidence. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 103, 261–324.Google Scholar
  114. Roe, A. (1953). A psychological study of eminent psychologists and anthropologists, and a comparison with biological and physical scientists. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 67(Whole No. 352).Google Scholar
  115. Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person. Boston: Houghton and Mifflin.Google Scholar
  116. Runco, M. A. (1991). Divergent thinking. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Shaw, E. R., Mann, J. J., and Stokes, P. E. (1986). Effects of lithium carbonate in creativity in bipolar outpatients. American Journal of Psychiatry, 143, 1166–1169.Google Scholar
  117. Simonton, D. K. (1984). Genius, creativity and leadership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  118. Soueif, M. I., and Farag, S. E. (1971). Creative thinking aptitudes in schizophrenics: A factorial study. Scientific Aesthetics, 8, 51–60.Google Scholar
  119. Strelau, J., and Eysenck, H. J. (Eds.). (1987). Personality dimension and arousal. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  120. Tipper, S. R. (1985). Negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 571–590.Google Scholar
  121. Treisman, A. (1964). Verbal cues, language and meaning in selective attention. American Journal of Psychology, 77, 205–219.Google Scholar
  122. Upmanyu, V. V., and Kaur, K. (1986). Diagnostic utility of word association emotional indicator. Psychological Studies, 32, 71–78.Google Scholar
  123. Vygotsky, L. S. (1934). Thought in schizophrenics. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 31, 1063–1077.Google Scholar
  124. Wallach, M. A., and Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity and intelligence distinction. New York: Holt, Rhinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
  125. Ward, P. B., McConaghy, N., and Catts, S. V. (1991). Word association and measures of psychosis-proneness in university students. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 473–480.Google Scholar
  126. Welsh, G. (1975). Creativity and intelligence: A personality approach. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
  127. Wilson, G. D. (1990). Personality, time of day and arousal. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 153–168.Google Scholar
  128. Woody, E., and Claridge, G. (1977). Psychoticism and thinking. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16, 241–248.Google Scholar
  129. Zuckerman, M. (1991). Psychobiology of personality. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans J. Eysenck
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of PsychiatryUniversity of LondonLondonEngland

Personalised recommendations