Skip to main content

Nature, Applications, and Limitations of Neuropsychological Assessment following Traumatic Brain Injury

  • Chapter
International Handbook of Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

Part of the book series: Critical Issues in Neuropsychology ((CINP))

Abstract

Neuropsychological assessment can provide information about the personality, behavior, mental abilities, learned skills, and rehabilitation potential of persons who have sustained traumatic brain injury (TBI). It is a psychological assessment procedure in that its primary data come from behavioral observations and its goal is to enhance understanding of behavior. It is neuropsychological in its use of specialized examination techniques requiring an educated appreciation of brain—behavior relationships and in its goal of elucidating behavioral manifestations of brain functions, both impaired and preserved. It is an assessment procedure in that it involves a comprehensive evaluation of the subject by means of a process that integrates test and other examination findings with information from other sources (e.g., data from the individual’s social, educational, employment, and psychological history). Neuropsychological assessments will usually include direct observations of the subject but may or may not involve formal (i.e., standardized, published) tests (Lezak, 1995). The information obtained through neuropsychological assessment may help clinicians and research scientists to understand the nature of the underlying insult to the brain. In making apparent the neuropsychological competencies and deficiencies of TBI patients and the course of their neuropsychological functioning, appropriate assessments can guide the rehabilitation process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anastasi, A. (1988). Psychological testing ( 6th ed. ). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder, L. M. (1986). Persisting symptoms after mild head injury: A review of the postconcussive syndrome. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 8, 323–346.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, J. M., Smith, S. A., and Imhoff, C. L. (1989). The response styles of post-acute brain-injured patients on MMPI. Brain Injury, 3, 35–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A., and Kaemmer, B. (1989). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2: Manual for Administration and Scoring. Minneapolis: Univeristy of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capitani, E. (1997). Normative data and neuropsychological assessment. Common problems in clinical practice and research. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 7, 295–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, A.-L. (1979). Lurias neuropsychological investigation (2nd ed.). Copenhagen: Munksgaard. Cronbach, L. J. (1984). Essentials of psychological testing ( 4th ed. ). New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodglass, H. (1980). Disorders of naming following brain injury. American Scientist, 68, 647–655.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gronwall, D., Wrightson, P., and Waddell, P. (1990). Head injury. The facts. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Hathaway, S. R., and McKinley, J. C. (1951). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory Manual (Revised). New York: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, R. K., Chelune, G. J., Talley, J. L., Kay, G. G., and Curtiss, G. (1993). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, E., Fein, D., Morris, R., and Delis, D. (1991). The WAIS-RNI. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation. Krug, R. S. (1967). MMPI response inconsistency of brain damaged individuals. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 23, 366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lezak, M. D. (1982). The problem of assessing executive functions. International Journal of Psychology, 17, 281–297. Lezak, M. D. (1993). Newer contributions to the neuropsychological assessment of executive functions. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 8, 24–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lezak, M. D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment ( 3rd ed. ). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matarazzo, J. D. (1986). Computerized clinical psychological test interpretation. Unvalidated plus all mean and no sigma. American Psychologist, 41, 14–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prigatano, G. P. (1991). Disturbances of self-awareness of deficit after traumatic brain injury. In G. P. Prigatano and D. L. Schachter (Eds.), Awareness of deficit after brain injury (pp. 111–126). New York: Oxford University Press. Sattler, J. M. (1988). Assessment of children ( 3rd ed. ). San Diego: J. M. Sattler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shallice, T., and Burgess, P. (1991). Higher-order cognitive impairments and frontal lobe lesions in man. In H. S. Levin, H. M. Eisenberg, and A. L. Benton (Eds.), Frontal lobe functions and dysfunction (pp. 125–138 ). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, J. M., Hales, R. E., and Yudofsky, S. C. (1997). Neuropsychiatrie aspects of traumatic brain injury. In S. C. Yudofsky and R. E. Hales (Eds.), American Psychiatric Press textbook of psychiatry (pp. 521–560 ). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, S., and Ponsford, J. (1995). Assessment of cognitive difficulties following TBI. In J. Ponsford (Ed.), Traumatic brain injury. Rehabilitation for everyday adaptive living (pp. 65–102). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum. Sohlberg, M. M., and Mateer, C. A. (1989). Introduction to cognitive rehabilitation. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuss, D. T., Ely, P., Hugenholtz, H., Richard, M. T., LaRochelle, S., Poirier, C. A., and Bell, I. (1985). Subtle neuropsychological deficits in patients with good recovery after closed head injury. Neurosurgery, 17, 41–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trexler, L. A., Webb, P. M., and Zappala, G. (1994). Strategic aspects of neuropsychological rehabilitation. In A.-L. Christensen and B. P. Uzzell (Eds.), Brain injuiry and neuropsychological rehabilitation (pp. 99–124 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lezak, M.D. (2000). Nature, Applications, and Limitations of Neuropsychological Assessment following Traumatic Brain Injury. In: Christensen, AL., Uzzell, B.P. (eds) International Handbook of Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. Critical Issues in Neuropsychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5569-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5569-5_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3324-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-5569-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics