The Delta Group Experience

TBI in France
  • Pierre North
  • Anne Passadori
  • Paul Millemann
Part of the Critical Issues in Neuropsychology book series (CINP)

Abstract

In France a good system exists for the early care of head injuries, thanks to an efficient emergency ambulance service created 20 years ago and a network of neurosurgical departments to receive patients. The rehabilitation and long-term care of such patients has lagged behind developments in some other countries. Few specialized units for head injury patients exist, particularly to assure their follow-up and to facilitate home return (social outcome) and work return.

Keywords

Traumatic Brain Injury Work Return Head Injury Patient Delta Program Behavioral Sequela 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bradley, V-A., Welch, J.-L., & Skilbeck, C.-E. (1993). The Newcastle Study: Background, Subject, and Method. In Cognitive retraining using microcomputers (pp. 210–227 ) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  2. Brooks, N. (1989). Closed head trauma: Assessing the common cognitive problems. In M. D. Lezak (Ed.), Assessment of the behavioral consequences of head trauma (pp. 61–85 ). New York: Alan R. Liss.Google Scholar
  3. Christensen, A. L. (1994). Visions for rehabilitation. In A. L. Christensen & B. P. Uzzell (Eds.), Brain injury and neuropsychological rehabilitation (pp. 293–299 ) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Girard, D., Brown, J., Burnett-Stolnack, M., Hashimoto, N., Hier-Wellmer, S., Perlman, O. Z., & Siegerman, C. (1996). The relationship of neuropsychological status and outcome following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 10, 663–676.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hamilton, M. (1960). A rating scale for depression. Journal of Neurology NeuroSurgery and Psychiatry, 23, 56–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Levin, H.-S., High, W: M., Goethe, K.-E., Sisson, R.-A., Overall, J.-E., Rhoades, H.-M., Eisenberg, H.-M., Kalisky, Z., & Gary, H.-E., (1987). The neurobehavioral rating scale: Assessment of the behavioral sequelae of head injury by the clinician. Journal of Neurology NeuroSurgery and Psychiatry, 50, 183–193Google Scholar
  7. Lezak, M. (1987). Assessment for rehabilitation planning. In M. J. Meier, A. L. Benton, & L. Diller (Eds.), Neuropsychological rehabilitation (pp. 41–58 ). New-York: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
  8. Mazaux, J. M., & Destaillats, J. M. (1994). Des troubles cognitifs aux troubles comportementaux, problèmes d’évaluation. In C. Bergego & Ph. Azouvi (Eds.), Neuropsychologie des traumatismes crâniens graves de l’adulte (pp. 207–221 ) Paris: Les Ateliers de Garches.Google Scholar
  9. Oppenheim-Gluckman, H., North, P., Dumond, J. J., Fayol, P., Bouvat, M. F., & Missonnier, P. (1997). Psychopathology, professional and social reinsertion in brain injury. Poster Session Second World Congress on TBI. Seville.Google Scholar
  10. Prigatano, G. (1986). Neuropsychological rehabilitation after brain injury. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Stein, D. G., Brailowsky, S., & Will, B. (1995). Brain repair. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Teasdale, T. W, Christensen, A.-L., Willmes, K., Deloche, G., Braga, L., Stachowiak, F., Vendrell, J.-M., CastroCaldas, A., Laaksonen, R.-K., & Leclercq, M. (1997) Subjective experience in brain—injured patients and their close relatives: A European Brain Injury Questionnaire study. Brain Injury, 11, 543–563.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Truelle, J. L., Brooks, N., Potagas, C., & Joseph P. A. (1994). A European chart for evaluation of patients with traumatic brain injury. In A. L. Christensen & B. P. Uzzell (Eds.), Brain injury and nuropsychological rehabilitation (pp. 281–291 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Van der Linden, M., Wyns, C., Coyette, F., von Frenckell, R., & Seron, X. (1989). Editest Bruxelles. Le Q.A. M. Questionnaire d’Auto-Evaluation de la Mémoire (pp 1–28). Personal communication.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pierre North
    • 1
  • Anne Passadori
    • 1
  • Paul Millemann
    • 1
  1. 1.The Mulhouse Center for ReadaptationMulhouse, CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations