The CRBI at the University of Copenhagen

A Participant—Therapist Perspective
  • Carla Caetano
  • Anne-Lise Christensen
Part of the Critical Issues in Neuropsychology book series (CINP)


The Center for Rehabilitation of Brain Injury (CRBI) is a postacute, holistic rehabilitation day program, of approximately 4 months duration, where 15 patients (referred to as students) participate in a combination of individual and group activities. The program is holistic and neuropsychological in orientation, allows for individualized goal setting, uses interdisciplinary planning and treatment, and provides a therapeutic milieu that addresses cognitive, emotional, and social concerns. See Christensen and Caetano (1999), Christensen and Teasdale (1998), and Trexler and Helmke (1996), for an extensive description of these types of programs.


Brain Injury Executive Functioning Task Completion Anterior Choroidal Artery Therapeutic Milieu 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Caetano, C. & Christensen, A-L. (1997). The design of neuropsychological rehabilitation: The role of neuropsychological assessment. In J. León-Carrión (Ed.), Neuropsychological rehabilitation Fundamentals, innovations and directions (pp. 63–72 ). Delray Beach, FL: St. Lucie Press.Google Scholar
  2. Christensen, A. L. (1975). Luria’s neuropsychological investigation. Manual and test materials (1st ed.). New York: Spectrum.Google Scholar
  3. Christensen, A. L. (1989). The neuropsychological investigation as a therapeutic and rehabilitative technique. In D.W. Ellis and A.L. Christensen (Eds.), Neuropsychological treatment after brain injury (pp. 127–153 ). Boston: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Christensen, A-L. & Caetano, C. (1997). Alexander Romanovitsch Luria (1902–1977): Contributions to neuropsychological rehabilitation. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, Special Issue 6, 279–303.Google Scholar
  5. Christensen, A-L. & Caetano, C. (1999). Cognitive neurorehabilitation: A comprehensive approach. In D. T. Stuss, G. Winour, & I. H. Robertson (Eds.) Neuropsychological rehabilitation in the interdisciplinary team: The postacute stage (pp. 188–199 ).Google Scholar
  6. Christensen, A. L. & Teasdale, T. W. (1993). A comprehensive and intensive program for cognitive and psychosocial rehabilitation. In E J. Stachowiak (Ed.), Developments in the assessment and rehabilitation of brain-damaged patients (pp. 465–467 ) Tubingen, Germany: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
  7. Christensen, A. L. & Teasdale, T. W. (1998). Rehabilitation assessment and planning for head trauma rehabilitation. In G. Goldstein and S. R. Beers (Eds.), Rehabilitation (pp. 171–180 ). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  8. Christensen, A. L., Jensen, L. R., & Risberg, J. (1990). Luria’s neuropsychological and neurolinguistic theory. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 4, 137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christensen, A. L., Pinner, E. M., Moller Pedersen, P., Teasdale, T. W, & Trexler, L. E. (1992). Psychosocial outcome following individualized neuropsychological rehabilitation of brain damage. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 85, 32–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deloche, G., North, E, Dellatolas, G., Christensen, A.L., Cremel, N., Passador, A., Dordain, M., & Hannequin, D. (1996). Le handicap des adultes cérébrolésés: le point de vue des patients et de leur entourage. (Point of view of patients and their close relatives on the handicap of brain damaged adults). Annales de Réadaptation et de Médicine Physique., 39, 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goldstein, K. (1952). Effects of brain damage on personality. Psychiatry, 15, 245–260.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Larsen, A., Mehlbye J., & Gortz, M. (1991). Kan genoptræning betale sig? En analyse of de sociale og okonomiske aspekter ved genoptræning of hjerneskadede. (Does rehabilitation pay? An anaysis of the social and economic aspects of brain injury rehabilitation) Copenhagen: AKF Forlaget.Google Scholar
  13. Teasdale, T. W, & Christensen, A. L. (1994). Psychosocial outcome in Denmark. In A. L. Christensen and B. P. Uzzell (Eds.), Brain injury and neuropsychological rehabilitation: International perspectives (pp. 235–244 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Teasdale, T. W, Christensen, A. L. & Pinner, M. (1993). Psychosocial rehabilitation of cranial trauma and stroke patients. Brain Injury, 7, 535–542.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Teasdale, T. W, Christensen, A-L., Willmes, K, Deloche, G, Braga, L, Stachowiak, F., Vendrell, J. M., Castro-Caldas, A., Laaksonen, R. K., & Leclercq, M. (1997). Subjective experience in brain injured patients and their close relatives: A European Brain Injury Questionnaire study. Brain Injury, 11, 543–563.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Trexler, L. E. & and Helmke, C. (1996). Efficacy of holistic neuropsychological rehabilitation: Progran characertistics and outcome research. In W. Fries (Ed.), Ambulante und teilstationär Rerehabilitation von hirnverletzten (pp. 25–39 ). (Outpatient rehabilitation for brain injury) München: W. Zuckschwerdt Verlag.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carla Caetano
    • 1
  • Anne-Lise Christensen
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Rehabilitation of Brain InjuryUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagen SDenmark

Personalised recommendations