Neuropsychological Postacute Rehabilitation

  • Anne-Lise Christensen
Part of the Critical Issues in Neuropsychology book series (CINP)


On the grounds of a lifelong experience with and research into brain injury, its sequelae, and restoration, it is the purpose of this chapter to present theoretical and practical tenets that have given evidence of the validity of neuropsychological rehabilitation.


Traumatic Brain Injury Brain Injury Brain Damage Cognitive Training Injured Person 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ben-Yishay, Y., and Diller, L. (1993). Cognitive remediation in traumatic brain injury: Update and issues. Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 74, 204–213.Google Scholar
  2. Brooks, N. (1991). Editorial. The effectiveness of post-acute rehabilitation. Brain Injury, 5, 103–109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruner, J. S. (1996). The culture of education. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., and Austin, G. A. (1956). A study of thinking. London: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  5. Bruner, J. S., Oliver, R. R., and Greenfield, P. M. (1966). Studies in cognitive growth. London: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  6. Castro-Caldas, A., Petersson, K. M., Reis, A., Stone-Elander, S., and Ingvar, M. (1998). The illiterate brain. Brain, 121, 1053–1063.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Christensen, A-L. (1975). Luria’s Neurosychological Investigation. Manual and test materials. New York: Spectrum.Google Scholar
  8. Christensen, A.-L. (1989). The neuropsychological investigation as a therapeutic and rehabilitative technique. In D. W. Ellis and A-L. Christensen (Eds.), Neuropsychological treatment after brain injury (pp. 126–156 ). Boston: Kluwer Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. Christensen, A.-L. (1998). 1997 Sheldon Berrol, MD, Senior Lectureship: Sociological and cultural aspects in post-acute neuropsychological rehabilitation. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 13, 79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Christensen, A.-L., and Caetano, C. (in press). Luria’s neuropsychological evaluation in the Nordic countries. Neuropsychological Review,special issue.Google Scholar
  11. Christensen, A: L., and Caetano, C. (1999). Cognitive neurorehabilitation: A comprehensive approach. In D. T. Stuss, G. Winour, and I. H. Robertson (Eds.), Neuropsychological rehabilitation in the interdisciplinary team: The post-acute stage (pp. 188–199). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Christensen, A.-L., and Teasdale, T. W. (1993). A comprehensive and intensive program for cognitive and psychosocial rehabilitation. In F. J. Stachowiak (Ed.), Developments in the assessment and rehabilitation of brain of brain damaged patients (pp. 465–467 ). Tübingen, Germany: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
  13. Christensen, A.-L., Jensen, L. R., and Risberg, J. (1990). Luria’s neuropsychological and neurolinguistic theory. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 4, 137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Christensen, A.-L., Pinner, E. M., Pedersen, P. M., Teasdale, T. W, and Trexler, L. E. (1992). Psychosocial outcome following individualized neuropsychological rehabilitation of brain damage. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 85, 32–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deloche, G., North, P., Dellatolas, G., Christensen, A-L., Cremel, N., Passador, A., Dordain, M., and Hannequin, D. (1996). Le handicap des adultes cérébrolésés: le point de vue des patients et de leur entourage. (Point of view of patients and their close relatives on the handicap of brain damaged adults). Annales de Réadaptation et de Médicine Physique, 39, 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goldstein, K. (1919). Die Behandlung, Fürsorge und Begutachtung der Hirnverletzten (zugleich ein Beitrag zur Verwendung psychologischer Methoden in der Klinik). Leipzig: E C. W. Vogel.Google Scholar
  17. Goldstein, K. (1939). The organism. A holistic approach to biology derived from pathological data in man. New York: American Book Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goldstein, K. (1942). Aftereffects of brain injury in war. New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
  19. Goldstein, K. (1952). The effect of brain damage on the personality. Psychiatry, 15, 245–260.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Goldstein, K. (1959). Functional disturbances in brain damage. In S. Arieti (Ed.), American handbook of psychiatry (pp. 770–794 ). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  21. Goldstein, K., and Gelb, A. (1918). Psychologische Analysen hirnpathologischer Fälle auf Grund von Untersuchungen Hirnverletzter. I. Abhandlung: Zur Psychologie des optischen Wahrnehmungs-und Erkennungsvorganges. Zeitschriftfür die gesamte Neurologie und Psychiatrie, 41, 1–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Larsen, A., Mehlbye, J., and Gartz, M. (1991). Kan genoptrcening betale sig? En analyse af de sociale og ekonomiske aspekter ved genoptrcening af hjerneskadede. ( Does rehabilitation pay? An analysis of the social and economic aspects of brain injury rehabilitation) Copenhagen: AKF Forlaget.Google Scholar
  23. Lazarus, R. (1998). Coping with age. Individuality as a key to understanding. In I. H. Norhus, G. R. von den Bos, S. Berg, and P. Fromholt (Eds.), Clinical gerontopsychology (pp. 109–127 ). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Luria, A. R. (1963). Restoration offunction after brain injury. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  25. Luria, A. R. (1965). Higher cortical functions in man. NewYork: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  26. Luria, A. R. (1970). Traumatic aphasia. Haag: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Luria, A. R. (1973). The working brain. An introduction to neuropsychology. Hammondsworth, England: Pengu in Books.Google Scholar
  28. Prigatano, G. P. (1997). Learning from our successes and failures: Reflections and comments on “Cognitive rehabilitation: How it is and how it must be.” Journal of International Neuropsychological Society, 3, 497–499.Google Scholar
  29. Rasmussen, G. (1994). A new approach to physical rehabilitation. In A-L. Christensen and B. P. Uzzell (Eds.), Brain injury and neuropsychological rehabilitation—International perspectives (pp. 161–172 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  30. Rubin, E. (1949). Experimenta psychologica. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
  31. Stein, D. G. (1988). Contextual factors in recovery from brain damage. In A-L. Christensen and B. P. Uzzell (Eds.), Neuropsychological rehabilitation (pp. 1–18 ). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stein, D. G., Glasier, M. M., and Hoffman, S. W. (1994). Pharmacological treatments for brain-injury repair: Progress and prognosis. In A-L. Christensen and B. P. Uzzell (Eds.), Brain injury and neuropsychological rehabilitation—International perspectives (pp. 17–39 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  33. Stein, D. G., Brailowsky, S., and Will, B. (1995). Brain repair. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Teasdale, T. W, and Christensen, A.-L. (1994). Psychosocial outcome in Denmark. In A.-L. Christensen and B. P. Uzzell (Eds.), Brain injury and neuropsychological rehabilitation—international perspectives (pp. 235–244 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  35. Teasdale, T. W, Christensen, A.-L., Willmes, K., Deloche, G., Braga, L., Stachowiak, F. J., Vendrell, J. M., CastroCaldas, A., Laaksonen, R. K., and Leclercq, M. (1997). Subjective experience in brain injured patients and their close relatives: A European Brain Injury Questionnaire study. Brain Injury, 11, 543–563.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Teuber, H-L., and Weinstein, S. (1958). Equipotentiality versus cortical localization. Science, 127, 241–242.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Trexler, L. E., and Helmke, C. (1996). Efficacy of holistic neuropsychological rehabilitation: Program characteristics and outcome research. In W. Fries (Ed.), Ambulante and teilstationär Rehabilitation von hirnverletzten (pp. 25–39 ). ( Outpatient rehabilitation for brain injured) München: W. Zuckschwerdt Verlag.Google Scholar
  38. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne-Lise Christensen
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Rehabilitation of Brain InjuryUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagen SDenmark

Personalised recommendations