Improved Compatibilization of Immiscible Homopolymer Blends Using Copolymer Mixtures

  • Yulia Lyatskaya
  • Anna C. Balazs


An analytical self-consistent-field theory and numerical self-consistent-field calculations are used to study the efficiency of binary mixtures of di- and comb block copolymers in reducing the interfacial tension between two immiscible homopolymers. In particular, we consider: 1) the mixture of diblock copolymers of two different molecular weights and 2) the mixture of diblock and comb copolymers, in which we vary the molecular weights for copolymers and the number of teeth for the comb. For the mixture of diblock copolymers of two different molecular weights, we show that the longer component controls the interfacial tension. For the mixture of the diblock and comb copolymers, we found that at a specific relationship between molecular weights of the copolymers and the number of teeth of the comb, the mixture can be more efficient than either of the pure components. The findings are important for tailoring the properties of immiscible blends.


Interfacial Tension Density Profile Pure Component Diblock Copolymer Relative Volume Fraction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1).
    Paul, D.R.; in Polymer Blends,Paul, D.R. and Newman, S., Eds., Academic Press, New York, 1978, vol.2, Chapter 12.Google Scholar
  2. 2).
    Noolandi, J.; Hong, K.M. Macromolecules 1984, 17, 1531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3).
    Leibler, L. Makromol. Chem., Makromol. Symp. 1988, 16, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4).
    See, for example, references in: Israels, R.; Jasnow, D.; Balazs, A.C.; Guo, L.; Sokolov, J.; Rafailovich, M.J. J.Chem. Phys. 1995, 102 8149.Google Scholar
  5. 5).
    Note, that recent synthetic efforts have yielded relatively direct methods for fabricating comb copolymers with well-controlled structures. See: Peiffer, D.G.; Rabeony, M. J. Appl. Poly. Sci. 1994, 51, 1283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6).
    Lyatskaya,Y.; Gersappe,D.; Balazs,A.C. Macromolecules 1995, 28, 6278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7).
    Lyatskaya,Y.; Jacobson, S.H.; Balazs,A.C. Macromolecules 1996, 29, 1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8).
    Lyatskaya, Y.; Gersappe, D.; Gross, N.A.; Balazs, A.C. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 1449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9).
    Lyatskaya,Y.; Balazs,A.C. Macromolecules 1996, 29, 7581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10).
    Fleer, G.J.; Cohen Stuart, M.A.; Scheutjens, J.M.H.M.; Cosgrove, T.; Vincent, B. Polymers at Interfaces; Chapman and Hall: London, 1993.Google Scholar
  11. 11).
    Helfand, E.; Tagami, Y. J. Polym. Sci., Part B 1971, 9, 741.Google Scholar
  12. 12).
    Birshtein,T.M.; Lyatskaya,Yu.V.; Zhulina,E.B. Polymer 1990, 31, 2185.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yulia Lyatskaya
    • 1
  • Anna C. Balazs
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemical and Petroleum EngineeringUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations