Two-Phase Methods for Global Optimization

  • Fabio Schoen
Part of the Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications book series (NOIA, volume 62)


Virtually all methods for global optimization consist of two phases: a global phase, aimed at thorough exploration of the feasible region or subsets of the feasible region where it is known the global optimum will be found, and a local phase aimed at locally improving the approximation to some local optima. Often these two phases are blended into the same algorithm, which automatically switches between exploration and refinement. In this paper, some methods will be reviewed in which the two phases are well separated. A formal definition of two-phase methods will be given and some of the characteristics of these methods will be outlined.


Local Search Global Optimization Local Optimum Feasible Region Local Phase 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Becker, R.W. and Lago, G.V. (1970). A global optimization algorithm. In Proceedings of the 8th Allerton Conference on Circuits and Systems Theory, pages 3–12.Google Scholar
  2. Betrò, B. and Schoen, F. (1987). Sequential stopping rules for the Multistart algorithm in global optimisation. Mathematical Programming, 38: 271–286.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Betrò, B. and Schoen, F. (1992). Optimal and suboptimal stopping rules for the multistart algorithm in global optimisation. Mathematical Programming, 57: 445–458.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boender, C.G.E. and Rinnooy Kan, A.H.G. (1987). Bayesian stopping rules for multistart global optimization methods. Mathematical Programming, 37: 59–80.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boender, C.G.E. and Rinnooy Kan, A.H.G. (1991). On when to stop sampling for the maximum. Journal of Global Optimization, 1(4):331340.Google Scholar
  6. Hansen, P. and Jaumard, B. (1995). Lipschitz optimization. In Horst, R. and Pardalos, P.M., editors, Handbook of Global Optimization, chapter Lipschitz Optimization, pages 407–494. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  7. Hoare, M.R. (1979). Structure and dynamics of simple microclusters. Advances in Chemical Physics, 40: 49–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Leary, R.H. and Doye, J.P.K. (1999). Tetrahedral global minimum for the 98-atom Lennard-Jones cluster. Physical Review E 60, pages R6320 — R6322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Locatelli, M. (1996). On relaxing the hypotheses for the application of multi level single linkage. J. of Global Optimization, 13: 25–42.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Locatelli, M. (2002). Simulated annealing algorithms for continuous global optimization. In Pardalos, P.M. and Romeijn, H.E., editors, Handbook of Global Optimization volume 2, pages 179–229. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  11. Locatelli, M. and Schoen, F. (1999). Random linkage: a family of acceptance/rejection algorithms for global optimisation. Mathematical Programming, 85 (2): 379–396.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Locatelli, M. and Schoen, F. (2000). Fast global optimization of difficult Lennard-Jones clusters. Computational Optimization and Applications, to appear.Google Scholar
  13. Lucidi, S. and Piccioni, M. (1989). Random tunneling by means of acceptance-rejection sampling for global optimization. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 62 (2): 255–276.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mockus, J. (1989). Bayesian Approach to Global Optimization. Mathematics and Its Applications (Soviet Series). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  15. Price, C.J. (1997). A multistart linkage algorithm using first derivatives. In Bomze, M., Csendes, T., Horst, R., and Pardalos, P.M., editors, Developments in Global Optimization, pages 135–152. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rinnooy Kan, A.H.G. and Timmer, G.T. (1987a). Stochastic global optimization methods. Part I: Clustering methods. Mathematical Programming, 39: 27–56.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rinnooy Kan, A.H.G. and Timmer, G.T. (1987b). Stochastic global optimization methods. Part II: Multi level methods. Mathematical Programming, 39: 57–78.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schoen, F. (1998). Random and quasi-random linkage mthods in global optimization. Journal of Global Optimization, 13: 445–454.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schoen, F. (1999). Global optimization methods for high-dimensional problems. E.J.O. R., 119 (2): 345–352.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Törn, A.A. (1973). Global Optimization as a Combination of Global and Local Search. PhD thesis, Abo Akademi.Google Scholar
  21. Törn, A.A. (1978). A search clustering approach to global optimization. In Dixon, L.C.W. and Szegö, G.P., editors, Towards global optimization 2, pages 49–62. North-Holland.Google Scholar
  22. Törn, A.A. and Viitanen, S. (1994). Topographical global optimization using pre-sampled points. Journal of Global Optimization, 5: 267–276.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wales, D.J. and Doye, J.P.K. (1997). Global optimization by basin-hopping and the lowest energy structures of Lennard-Jones clusters containing up to 110 atoms. Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 101: 5111–5116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wales, D.J. and Scheraga, H.A. (1999). Global optimization of clusters, crystals, and biomolecules. Science, 285 (5432): 1368–1372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fabio Schoen
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Sistemi e InformaticaUniversità degli Studi di FirenzeFirenzeItaly

Personalised recommendations