Creativity and Intelligence

  • Patricia A. Haensly
  • Cecil R. Reynolds
Part of the Perspectives on Individual Differences book series (PIDF)


Consideration of the relationship between creativity and intelligence during this past half-century has occupied the attention of psychologists with varied perspectives (e.g., Cattell, 1963a; Coler, 1963; Guilford, 1950, 1959, 1968, 1981; MacKinnon, 1962; Roe, 1951, 1963; Terman, 1954, 1955; Torrance, 1960, 1967). Scientists working in a variety of other disciplines from genetics to engineering (see Simonton, 1984, 1985; Taylor & Barron, 1963) also have been intrigued by the contribution of intelligence to creative discovery and invention. And philosophers from Aristotle and Plato to Immanuel Kant, Brand Blanshard, and Jacques Maritain (citing here only those of Western civilization) (Rothenberg & Hausman, 1976) have pondered the origin of creativity and its relationship to rational thought. Professionals and lay people alike are fascinated by the topic, and, even more so, by the consequences of applying creative effort and/or intelligent action, and by the implications for their nurturance and educability. This chapter will provide a brief overview of past perspectives regarding the nature and extent of a relationship between creativity and intelligence and will propose and support a view of the two phenomena as integrated in optimal mental performance.


Creative Process Creative Thinking Intelligence Test Divergent Thinking Creative Potential 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anastasi, A. (1958). Heredity, environment, and the question “How?” Psychological Review, 65, 197–208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anastasi, A., & Schaefer, C. E. (1971). Notes on the concepts of creativity and intelligence. Journal of Creative Behavior, 5, 113–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ausubel, D. P. (1978). The nature and measurement of creativity. Psychologia, 21, 179–191.Google Scholar
  4. Barron, F. (1963). Creativity and psychological health: Origins of personality and creative freedom. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  5. Bittel, K. R. (1964). Creativity in the visual arts in higher education. In C. W. Taylor (Ed.), Widening horizons in creativity. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Bloom, B. (1985). Developing talent in young children. New York: Ballantyne.Google Scholar
  7. Brigham, T. A., Graubard, P. S., & Stans, A. (1972). Analysis of the effects of sequential reinforcement contingencies on aspects of composition. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 421–429.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Case, R. (1978). Piaget and beyond: Toward a developmentally based theory and technology of instruction. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 167228 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Cattell, R. B. (1963a). The personality and motivation of the researcher from measurements of contemporaries and from biography. In C. W. Taylor & F. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development (pp. 119–131 ). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Cattell, R. B. (1963b). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coler, M. A. (1963). Essays on creativity in the sciences. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Conger, J. J. (June, 1957 ). The meaning and measurement of intelligence. Rocky Mountain Medical Journal, 54, 10–12.Google Scholar
  13. Crockenberg, S. B. (1972). Creativity tests: A boon or boondoggle for education? Review of Educational Research, 42, 27–45.Google Scholar
  14. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Robinson, R. E. (1986). Culture, time, and the development of talent. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 264–284 ). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. deBono, E. (1971). New think. New York: Avon Books.Google Scholar
  16. Dellas, M., & Gaier, E. L. (1970). Identification of creativity: The individual. Psychological Bulletin, 73 (1), 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. New York: Heath.Google Scholar
  18. Eisner, E. W. (1965). Children’s creativity in art: A study of types. American Educational Research Journal, 2, 125–136.Google Scholar
  19. Elliott, J. M. (1964). Measuring creative abilities in public relations and in advertising work. In C. W. Taylor (Ed.), Widening horizons in creativity. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  20. Estes, W. K. (1985). Learning, memory, and intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of human intelligence (pp. 170224 ). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Feldman, D. H., with Benjamin, A. C. (1986). Giftedness as a developmentalist sees it. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 285–305 ). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Fishbein, H. D. (1976). Evolution, development, and children’s learning. Pacific Palisades, CA: Goodyear.Google Scholar
  23. Gardner, H. (1982). Art, mind, and brain. A cognitive approach to creativity. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  24. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  25. Getzels, J. W., & Jackson, P. W. (1959). The highly intelligent and the highly creative adolescent: A summary of some research findings. In C. W. Taylor (Ed.), The Third University of Utah Research Conference on the Identification of Creative Scientific Talent. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
  26. Getzels, J. W., & Jackson, P. W. (1962). Creativity and intelligence: Explorations with gifted students. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Glover, J., & Gary, A. L. (1976). Procedures to increase some aspects of creativity. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 79–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Glover, J., & Sautter, F. (1977). Procedures for increasing four behaviorally defined components of creativity within formal written assignments among high school students. School Applications of Learning Theory, 9, 3–22.Google Scholar
  29. Goetz, E. M., & Baer, D. M. (1973). Social control of form diversity and the emergence of new forms in children’s block-building. Journal ofAppliedBehavioralAnalysis, 6, 209–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Golann, S. E. (1963). Psychological study of creativity. Psychological Bulletin, 60, 560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gough, H. (1961). Techniques for identifying the creative research scientist. In D. W. MacKinnon (Ed.), The creative person. Berkeley: Institute of Personality Assessment and Research, University of California.Google Scholar
  32. Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Guilford, J. P. (1959). Three faces of intellect. American Psychologist, 14, 469–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Guilford, J. P. (1963). An informational theory of creative thinking. Paper presented at the Convention of the Western Psychological Association, Santa Monica, CA. (Available in USAF Instructors’ Journal, 1, 28–33.Google Scholar
  35. Guilford, J. P. (1967). Creativity: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Creative Behavior, 1, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Guilford, J. P. (1968). Intelligence, creativity and their educational implications. San Diego, CA: Robert Knapp.Google Scholar
  37. Guilford, J. P. (1981). Potentiality for creativity. In J. C. Gowan, J. Khatena, & E. P. Torance (Eds.), Creativity: Its educational implications ( 2nd ed., pp. 1–5 ). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.Google Scholar
  38. Guilford, J. P., & Christensen, P. R. (1973). The one-way relation between creative potential and IQ. Journal of Creative Behavior, 7, 247–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Haensly, P. A. (1979). Behavior modification for problem solving: Originality and creative production expanded. Unpublished manuscript. Texas AM University, Gifted & Talented Institute, College Station, TX.Google Scholar
  40. Haensly, P. A., & Roberts, N. M. (1983). The professional productive process and its implications for gifted studies. Gifted Child Quarterly, 27, 9–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Haensly, P. A., Reynolds, C. R., & Nash, W. R. (1986). Giftedness: coalescence, context, conflict, and commitment. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 128–148 ). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Harper, T. (1983, October 4). Celebrated sculptor can’t even read (Associated Press). Boulder, CO: Bryan-College Station Eagle, page 1C.Google Scholar
  43. Hebb, D. O. (1972). Textbook of psychology ( 3rd ed. ). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.Google Scholar
  44. Jackson, P. W., & Messick, S. (1967). The person, the product, and the response: Conceptual problems in the assessment of creativity. In J. Kagan (Ed.), Creativity and learning (pp. 119 ). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  45. Kagan, J. (Ed.). (1967). Creativity and learning. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  46. Krippner, S. (1983). A systems approach to creativity based on Jungian typology. Gifted Child Quarterly, 27, 86–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Locurto, C. M. (1974). Verbal operant conditioning and self-reinforcement of originality. Dissertation Abstracts International, 35, 1945-B.Google Scholar
  48. MacKinnon, D. W. (1960). The highly effective individual. Teachers College Record, 61, 367–378.Google Scholar
  49. MacKinnon, D. W. (1961). Creativity in architects. In D. W. MacKinnon (Ed.), The creative person. Berkeley: Institute of Personality Assessment and Research, University of California.Google Scholar
  50. MacKinnon, D. W. (1962). The nature and nurture of creative talent. American Psychologist, 17, 484–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Maloney, M. P., & Ward, M. P. (1976). Psychological assessment: A conceptual approach. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Maltzman, I. (1960). On the training of originality. Psychological Review, 67, 229–242.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. May, R. (1975). The courage to create. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  54. Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–227, 232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mednick, S. A., & Andrews, F. M. (1967). Creative thinking and level of intelligence. Journal of Creative Behavior, 1, 428–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nash, W. R. (1975). The effects of warm-up activities on small group divergent problem solving with young children. Journal of Psychology, 89, 237–241.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., & Simon, H. A. (1962). The processes of creative thinking. In H. E. Gruber, G. Terrell, & M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to creative thinking (pp. 63–119 ). New York: Atherton Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Owens, W. A. (1972). Intellective, non-intellective, and environmental correlates of mechanical ingenuity. In C. Taylor (Ed.), Climate for creativity (pp. 253–268 ). New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  59. Pascuale-Leone, J. (1970). A mathematical model for transition in Piaget’s developmental stages. Acta Psychologica, 32, 301–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Piaget, J. (1972). Intellectual evolution from adolescence to adulthood. Human Development, 15, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Roe, A. (1951). A psychological study of physical scientists. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 43 (2), 121–235.Google Scholar
  62. Roe, A. (1952). The making of a scientist. New York: Dodd, Mead.Google Scholar
  63. Roe, A. (1963). Psychological approaches to creativity in science. In M. A. Coler (Ed.), Essays on creativity in the sciences (pp. 153–182 ). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Rossiman, T., & Horn, J. (1971). Cognitive, motivational and temperamental indicants of creativity and intelligence. Journal of Educational Measurement, 9, 265–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rothenberg, A., & Hausman, C. R. (1976). The creativity question. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Schubert, A. (1973). Intelligence as necessary but not sufficient for creativity. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 122, 45–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Simonton, D. K. (1979). The eminent genius in history: The critical role of creative development. In J. C. Gowan, J. Khatena, & E. P. Torrance (Eds.), Educating the ablest ( 2nd ed., pp. 79–87 ). New York: F. E. Peacock.Google Scholar
  68. Simonton, D. K. (1984). Genius, creativity, and leadership: Historiometric inquiries. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Simonton, D. K. (1985, December). Genius, creativity and leadership. EEE Potentials, pp. 31–32.Google Scholar
  70. Skager, R. W., Klein, S. P., & Schultz, C. B. (1967). The prediction of academic and artistic achievement in a school of design. Journal of Educational Measurement, 4, 105–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man: Their nature and measurement. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  72. Spearman, C. (1930). Creative mind. London: Nisbet.Google Scholar
  73. Sternberg, R. J. (1984). Toward a triarchic theory of human intelligence. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 269–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Sternberg, R. J. (1986). Identifying the gifted through IQ: Why a little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing. RoeperReview, 8, 143–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (1983). Insight in the gifted. Educational Psychologist, 18, 51–57.Google Scholar
  77. Sternberg, R. J., & Wagner, R. K. (1986). Practical intelligence: Nature and origins of competence in the everyday world. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Taylor, C. W., & Barron, F. (Eds.). (1963). Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  79. Taylor, I. (1975). A retrospective view of creativity investigation. In I. A. Taylor & J. W. Getzels (Eds.), Perspectives in creativity (pp. 1–36 ). Chicago: Aldine Publishing.Google Scholar
  80. Terman, L. M. (1954). Scientists and nonscientists in a group of 800 gifted men. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 68 (7, Whole No. 378 ).Google Scholar
  81. Terman, L. M. (1955). Are scientists different? Scientific American, 192(1), 25–29.Google Scholar
  82. Thorndike, E. L. (1921). Intelligence and its measurement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 12, 124–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Thorndike, E. L. (1926). Measurement of intelligence. New York: Teachers’ College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  84. Thurstone, L. L. (1931). Multiple factor analysis. Psychological Review, 38, 406–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Torrance, E. P. (1960). Eight partial replications of the GetzelsJackson study. Research Memorandum BER-60–15. Minneapolis: Bureau of Educational Research, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  86. Torrance, E. P. (1962). Guiding creative talent. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Torrance, E. P. (1966). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-technical manual. Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press.Google Scholar
  88. Torrance, E. P. (1967). Scientific views of creativity and factors affecting its growth. In J. Kagan (Ed.), Creativity and learning (pp. 73–91 ). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  89. Vernon, P. E. (1950). The structure of human abilities. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  90. Wade, S. (1968). Differences between intelligence and creativity: Some speculation on the role of environment. Journal of Creative Behavior, 2, 97–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wallach, M. A. (1985). Creativity testing and giftedness. In F. D. Horowitz & M. O’Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives (pp. 99–124 ). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  93. Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1972). Creativity and intelligence in children. In A. Rothenberg & C. R. Hausman (Eds.), The creativity question (pp. 208–217 ). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  94. Wallas, G. ( 1926, 1945). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt, Brace. Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary ( 1980 ). Springfield, MA: G. & C. Merriam.Google Scholar
  95. Wittrock, M. C. (1974). Learning as a generative process. Educational Psychologist, 11, 87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Yamamoto, K. A. (1964a). Role of creative thinking and intelligence in high school achievement. Psychological Reports, 14, 783–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Yamamoto, K. A. (1964b). Threshold of intelligence in academic achievement of highly creative students. Journal of Experimental Education, 32, 401–405.Google Scholar
  98. Yamamoto, K. A. (1964c). A further analysis of the role of creative thinking in high-school achievement. Journal of Psychology, 58, 277–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Yamamoto, K. A. (1965). Validation of tests of creative thinking: A review of some studies. Exceptional Children, 31, 281–290.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patricia A. Haensly
    • 1
  • Cecil R. Reynolds
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Educational PsychologyTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations