Toward a Model of Creativity Based upon Problem Solving in the Social Sciences

  • James F. Voss
  • Mary L. Means
Part of the Perspectives on Individual Differences book series (PIDF)


Although creativity manifests itself in all areas of inquiry, most of the cited examples of creative thought involve the thinking of mathematicians, physical and biological scientists, writers, composers, and artists. In typical circumstances, few examples are cited in reference to social scientists. Yet creative acts may be found in virtually any domain, as, for example, in sports, when the forward pass was first used as an offensive weapon in football, or in business, when Henry Ford saw the implications of an assembly line and also realized that mass production would require mass consumption. Similarly, the work of March and Simon (1958) on organizational theory and the theoretical developments of Freud embrace creative work.


Social Science Prior Knowledge Creative Process Creative Thinking Creative Individual 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  2. Bassaches, M. (1984). Dialectical thinking and adult development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  3. Boorstin, D. J. (1983). The discoverers. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  4. Bransford, J. D., and Stein, B. S. (1984). The ideal problem solver. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  5. Bronowski, J. (1956). Science and human values. New York: Julian Messner.Google Scholar
  6. Bruner, J. (1962). The conditions of creativity. In H. E. Gruber (Ed.), Contemporary approaches to creative thinking (pp. 130 ). New York: Atherton Press.Google Scholar
  7. Crutchfield, R. S. (1962). Conformity and creative thinking. In H. E. Gruber (Ed.), Contemporary approaches to creative thinking (pp. 120–140 ). New York: Atherton Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deutsch, K. W., Platt, J., and Senghass, D. (1971). Conditions favoring major advances in social sciences. Science, 171, 450–458.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Getzels, J. W., and Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Gruber, H. E. (1981). Darwin on man: A psychological study of scientific creativity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hayes, J. R. (1981). The complete problem solver. Philadelphia: The Franklin Institute Press.Google Scholar
  12. Heisenberg, W. (1958). Physics and philosophy: The revolution in modern science. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  13. Henle, M. (1962). The birth and death of ideas. In H. E. Gruber (Ed.), Contemporary approaches to creativity. (pp. 31–62 ). New York: Atherton Press.Google Scholar
  14. Inkeles, A. (1983). The sociological contribution to advances in the social sciences. Social Science Journal, 20, 27–44. Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. New York: Dell.Google Scholar
  15. Larkin, J. H., McDermott, J., Simon, D. P., and Simon, H. A. (1980). Models of competence in solving physics problems. Cognitive Science, 4, 317–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Luchins, A. S. (1942). Mechanization in problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 54, (Whole No. 248).Google Scholar
  17. March, J. G., and Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. Murray, E. L. (1986). Imaginative thinking and human existence. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Newell, A. (1980). One final word. In D. T. Tuma and F. Reif (Eds.), Problem solving and education: Issues in teaching and research (pp. 175–189 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Newell, A., and Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  21. Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., and Simon, H. A. (1962). The processes of creative thinking. In H. E. Gruber (Ed.), Contemporary approaches to creative thinking (pp. 63–119). New York: Atherton Press.Google Scholar
  22. Perkins, D. N. (1981). The mind’s best work. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Perkins, D. N. (1984). What else but genius? Six dimensions of the creative mind. Paper prepared for the symposium on creativity in science, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico.Google Scholar
  24. Poincaré, H. (1946). The foundations of science: Science and hypothesis, the value of science, science and method (G. G. Halsted, Trans.). Lancaster, PA: Science Press.Google Scholar
  25. Reitman, W. (1965). Cognition and thought. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Rothenberg, A. (1979). The emerging goddess. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  28. Simon, H. A. (1966). Scientific discovery and the psychology of problem solving. In R. G. Colodny (Ed.), Mind and cosmos (pp. 22–40 ). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  29. Simon, H. A. (1973). The structure of ill-structured problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4, 181–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tweney, R. D. (1985). Faraday’s discovery of induction: A cognitive approach. In D. Gooding and F. James (Eds.), Faraday rediscovered (pp. 189–209 ). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. Vaughan, T. D. (1985). The balance of opposites in the creative process. Gifted Education International, 3, 38–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Voss, J. F. (1987). Learning and transfer in subject matter learning: A problem-solving model. [Special issue]. International Journal of Education Research, 11, 607–622.Google Scholar
  33. Voss, J. F., and Post, T. A. (1988). On the solving of ill-structured problems. In M. T. H. Chi, R. Glaser, and M. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. 261–285 ).Google Scholar
  34. Voss, J. F., Greene, T. R., Post, T. A., and Penner, B.C. (1983). Problem solving skill in the social sciences. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and instruction: Advances • in research and theory (Vol. 17; pp. 165–213 ). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  35. Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
  36. Weiss, I. R. (1978). Report of the 1977 national survey of science, mathematics, and social studies education. Report to the National Science Foundation and Contract No. C7619848. Center for Educational Research and Evaluation, Research Triangle Institute.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • James F. Voss
    • 1
  • Mary L. Means
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Learning Research and Development CenterUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations