Skip to main content

Abstract

International trade flows in agro-food products have increased dramatically over the last three decades. Trade is likely to continue expanding now that agriculture is integrated into the overall framework of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). In addition to the increase in the volume of trade, there has been a considerable increase in the diversity of products traded. Food products now come from more distant and more various origins. They are imported from countries that differ in institutional structure and regulatory framework and, therefore, in their perceived ability to protect consumers from unsafe products and deceptive practices. As a result, the ongoing process of trade liberalization raises consumer concerns about the safety of food products.

The views expressed in this chapter are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of their respective institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akerlof, G. A., 1970, The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism, Q J Econ 84 (3): 488–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antle, J. M., 1995, Choice and Efficiency in Food Safety Policy, AEI Press, American Enterprise Institute, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J., Cropper, M. L., Eads, G. C., Hahn, R. W., Lave, L. B., Noll, R. G, Portney, P. R., Russell, M., Schmalensee, R., Smith, V. K., and Stavins, R. N., 1996, Is there a role for benefit-cost analysis in environmental, health and safety regulation?, Science 272: 221–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baghwati, J. N., and Hudec, R. E., eds., 1996, Fair Trade and Harmonization, Prerequisites for Free Trade?, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R. E., 1970, Non-Tariff Distortions in International Trade,Brookings Institute, Washington, DC. Beales, H., Craswell, R., and Salop, S., 1981, The efficient regulation of consumer information, J Law Econ 24(Dec.):49 1–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau, J. C., and Doussin, J. P., 2000, Sanitary and technical regulations: Issues for trade liberalization in the dairy sector, Can J Agric Econ 47 (5): 149–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau, J. C., and Marette, S., 2000, Accounting for consumers’ preferences in international trade rules, in: Incorporating Science, Economics, and Sociology in Developing Sanitary and Phytosanitary Standards in International Trade: Proceedings of a Conference,Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, ed., pp. 170–198, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau, J. C., Gozlan E., and Marette, S., 1999, Quality Signaling and International Trade in Food Products, THEMA series, Working Paper 99–13, University of Paris X-Nanterre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau, J. C., Marette, S., and Schiavina, A., 1998, Non-tariff trade barriers and consumers’ information: The case of the EU-US trade dispute over beef, Eur Rev Agric Econ 25(4):437–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzby, J. C., Roberts, T.,Lin, C.-T. J., and MacDonald, J. M. 1996, Bacterial Foodborne Disease: Medical Costs and Productivity Losses, Agricultural Economic Report 741, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caswell, J. A., and Mojduszka, E. M., 1996, Using Informational Labeling to Influence the Market for Quality in Food Products, paper presented at American Association of Agricultural Economists meeting, Jul. 29, 1996, San Antonio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., 1996, A sober second look at appellations of origin: How the United States will crash France’s wine and cheese party, Minn J Global Trade 5(1)19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crutchfield, S., Buzby, J. C., Roberts, T., 011inger, M., and Lin, C.-T. J., 1997, An Economic Assessment of Food Safety Regulations: The New Approach to Meat and Poultry Inspection, Agricultural Economic Report 755, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington, DC. Falvey, R. E., 1989, The composition of trade within import restricted trade categories, J Polit Earn 87: 1105–1114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, A. M., 1993, Measuring Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal-Or, E., 1989a, Quality and quantity competition, Bell J Econ 16: 590–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal-Or, E., 19896, Warranties as a signal of quality, Can J Econ 22(1):50–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gozlan, E., and Marette, S., 2000, Commerce international et réglementation optimale de la qualité des produits, Economie Internationale 52: 54–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski, H. G., and Vernon, J. M., 1983, The Regulation of Pharmaceuticals: Balancing the Benefits and Risks, American, Enterprise Institute, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G., and Shapiro, C., 1988, Counterfeit product trade, Am Econ Rev 75: 59–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, W., and Portney, P. R., 1987, Valuing the benefits of health and safety regulations, J Urban Econ 22 (1): 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, D., Shogren, J., Shin, S., and Kliebenstein, J., 1995, Valuing food safety in experimental auctions markets, Am J Agric Econ 77 (1): 40–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoban, T., 1998, Trends in consumer attitudes about agricultural biotechnology, AgBioForum 1(1):3–7, http://www.agbioforum.org/vollnol/hoban.html (accessed Jul. 27, 2001 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • James, S., and Anderson, K., 1998., On the Need for More Economic Assessment of Quarantine/SPS Policies,CIES Seminar Paper 98–02, University of Adelaide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joly, P-B., and Lemarié, S., 1998, Industry consolidation, public attitude and the future of plant biotechnology in Europe, AgBioForum 1(2):85–90, http://www.agbioforum.org/vollno2/joly.html (accessed Jul. 27, 2001 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Josling, T., 1998, EU-US Trade Conflicts over Food Safety Legislation: An Economist’s Viewpoint on Legal Stress Points That Will Concern the Industry, paper presented at Forum for US-EU Legal-Economic Affairs, Sept. 16–19, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopp, R. J., Krupnick, A. J., and Toman, M., 1997, Cost Benefit Analysis and Regulatory Reform: An Assessment of the Science and the Art, Discussion Paper 97–19, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krouse, C. G., 1990, Theory of Industrial Economics, Basil Blackwell, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P., 1979, Increasing returns, monopolistic competition and international trade, J Int Econ 9: 469–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landelfeld, J. S., and Seskin, E. P., 1982, The economic value of life: Linking theory and practice, Am J Public Health 6: 555–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magat, W. A., and Viscusi, W. K., 1992, Informational Approaches to Regulation,MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambridge, MA. Mahé, L. P., 1997, Environment and quality standards in the WTO: New protectionism in agricultural trade, Eur Rev Agric Econ 24 (3–4): 480–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mussa, M., and Rosen, S., 1978, Monopoly and product quality, J Econ Theory 18: 301–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 1996, Competition Policy and the Agro-Food Sector,Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 1999, Food Safety and Quality: Trade Considerations,Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2000a, Report of the Ad Hoc Group on Food Safety, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2000b, OECD Agricultural Outlook 2000–2005,Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2001, Designations of Origin and Geographical Indicators in OECD Member Countries: Economic and Legal Implications, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, R. A., 1995, Regulating risks, J Econ Lit 33 (1): 179–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, R. A., 1998, Imagined risks and cost-benefit analysis, Am Econ Rev, Papers and Proceedings 88 (2): 376–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, M., 1997, Science in Sanitary and Phytosanitary Dispute Resolution, Discussion Paper 97–50, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitzes, J. D., 1992, Quality choice, trade policy and firm incentives, Int Econ Rev 33 (4): 817–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D., 1998, The WTO SPS Agreement: Overview and Implications for Animal Health and Animal Product Decision Making, paper presented at the U.S. Department of Agriculture Workshop on Use of Economic Analysis in Evaluating Animal and Animal Product Import Request, Mar. 24–25, Riverdale, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, L., 1988, Mandated Science: Science and Scientists in the Making of Standards, Kluwer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shaked, A., and Sutton, J., 1983, Natural oligopolies, Econometrica 51: 1469–1484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, C., 1983, Premiums for high quality products as returns to reputations, Q J Econ 98: 659–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverglade, B., 1998, Should the SPS Agreement Be Amended? A Modest Proposal to Restore Public Sup-port, paper presented at the Ceres Conference on Politicizing Science: What Price Public Policy?

    Google Scholar 

  • Apr. 4, 1998, Georgetown University Public Policy Institute, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, M., 1975, Monopoly, quality, and regulation, Bell J Econ 6 (2): 417–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J., 1994, Whither Socialism?, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thilmany, D. D., and Barrett, C. B., 1997, Regulatory barriers in an integrating world food market, Rev Agric Econ 19 (1): 91–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. K., 1993, The value of risks to life and health, J Econ Lit 31 (Dec.): 1912–1946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. K., Vernon, J. M., and Harrington, J. E., Jr., 1995, Economics of Regulation and Antitrust, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C., 1980, The nature of equilibrium with adverse selection, Bell J Econ 5: 275–284.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bureau, JC., Jones, W., Gozlan, E., Marette, S. (2002). Issues in Demand for Quality and Trade. In: Krissoff, B., Bohman, M., Caswell, J.A. (eds) Global Food Trade and Consumer Demand for Quality. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5329-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5329-5_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3379-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-5329-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics