In this final chapter a summary and evaluation of the monograph are given. Section 7.1 provides a brief, yet comprehensive survey of the main results obtained. Subsequently, Section 7.2 evaluates these results and the method(s) employed to derive them, and advances some ideas for future research.


Interest Group Public Choice Game Model Electoral Competition Campaign Contribution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Austen-Smith, D. and J.R. Wright, 1994, Counteractive lobbying, American Journal of Political Science 38, 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Austen-Smith, D. and J.R. Wright, 1996, Theory and evidence for counteractive lobbying, American Journal of Political Science 40, 543–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldwin, R., 1987, Politically realistic objective functions and trade policy PROFs and tariffs, Economics Letters 24, 287–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumgartner, F.R. and B.L. Leech, 1996a, The multiple ambiguities of “counteractive lobbying”, American Journal of Political Science 40, 521–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumgartner, F.R. and B.L. Leech, 1996b, Good theories deserve good data, American Journal of Political Science 40, 565–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cho, I.K. and J. Sobel, 1990, Strategic stability and uniqueness in signaling games, Journal of Economic Theory 50, 381–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Conlisk, J., 1996, Why bounded rationality?, Journal of Economic Literature 34, 669–700.Google Scholar
  8. Coughlin, P.J., Mueller, D.C. and P. Murrell, 1990a, A model of electoral competition with interest groups, Economics Letters 32, 307–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coughlin, P.J., Mueller, D.C. and P. Murrell, 1990b, Electoral politics, interest groups, and the size of government, Economic Inquiry 29, 682–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crawford, V.P., 1995, Theory and experiment in the analysis of strategic interaction, Discussion Paper 95–37 ( University of California, San Diego ).Google Scholar
  11. Engers, M., 1987, Signalling with many signals, Econometrica 55, 663–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grossman, G.M. and E. Helpman, 1996, Electoral competition and special interest politics, Review of Economic Studies 63, 265–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnson, P.E., 1996, Corporate political offices in a rent-seeking society, Public Choice 88, 309–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lindbeck, A. and J. Weibull, 1987, Balanced budget redistribution as the outcome of political competition, Public Choice 52, 273–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lohmann, S., 1994, Electoral incentives, political intransparency and the policy bias toward special interests, Mimeo ( University of California, Los Angeles).Google Scholar
  16. Milgrom, P. and J. Roberts, 1986, Price and advertising signals of product quality, Journal of Political Economy 94, 796–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Milgrom, P. and J. Roberts, 1987, Informational asymmetries, strategic behavior, and industrial organization, American Economic Review 77, 184–193.Google Scholar
  18. Moloney, K. and G. Jordan, 1996, Why companies hire lobbyists, The Service Industries Journal 16, 242–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Persson, T., 1998, Economic policy and special interest politics, Economic Journal 108, 310–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Potters, J., 1992, Lobbying and pressure. Theory and experiments ( Thesis Publishers, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
  21. Potters, J. and F. van Winden, 1996, Comparative statics of a signaling game, International Journal of Game Theory 25, 329–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Potters, J. and F. van Winden, 1998, The performance of professionals and students in an experimental studying of lobbying, Working paper TI 98–008/1 ( Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
  23. Quinzii, M. and J.-C. Rochet, 1985, Multidimensional signalling, Journal of mathematical economics 14, 261–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ramey, G., 1996, Dl signaling equilibria with multiple signals and a continuum of types, Journal of Economic Theory 69, 508–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Van Winden, F., 1997a, Experimental studies of signaling games, Working Paper TI 97–033/1 ( Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
  26. Van Winden, F., 1997b, On the economic theory of interest groups: Towards a group frame of reference in political economics, forthcoming in: Public Choice.Google Scholar
  27. Wilson, R., 1985, Multi-dimensional signalling, Economics Letters 19, 17–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Randolph Sloof
    • 1
  1. 1.University of AmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations