• Albert Valdman
Part of the Topics in Language and Linguistics book series (TLLI)


In concluding his review of Conwell and Juilland’s book Louisiana French Grammar I, William Bright (1966) declared, “The job on Louisiana French remains to be done.” Despite an impressive collection of studies produced in the three decades since Bright’s observation, the conclusion is still valid. In the absence of what might be termed classic studies of the linguistic situation of Francophone Louisiana, this collective volume is intended to fill that gap. However, it not only presents current knowledge about French and Creole in Louisiana, but also points the way toward new research questions and suggests novel avenues of inquiry.


Language Policy Language Planning Person Plural Language Shift Speech Variety 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bright, W. (1966). Review of M. Conwell & A. Juilland. (1963). Louisiana French grammar I: Phonology, morphology, syntax. Romance Philology, 19, 490–495.Google Scholar
  2. Byers, B. (1988). Defining norms for a non-standardized language: A study of verb and pronoun variation in Cajun French. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
  3. Carrière, J.-M. (1937). Tales fmm the French Folk-Lore of Missouri. Evanston/Chicago: Northwestern University.Google Scholar
  4. Chaudenson, R. (1989). Vers une révolution francophone. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  5. Conwell, M., & Juilland, A. (1963). Louisiana French Grammar I. Phonology, Morphology, and syntax. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  6. Dorian, N. (1977). The problem of the semi-speaker in language death. In J. Fishman (Ed.), International journal of the sociology of language: Language death, 12 (pp. 23–32 ). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  7. Dorian, N. (1981). Language Death: The Life Cycle of a Scottish Gaelic Dialect. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  8. Gravelles, M. U. de. [Marrante], D.] (1979). Mille misères—Laissant le temps rouler en Louisiane. Québec: Project Louisiane, Université Laval.Google Scholar
  9. Guilbeau, J. A. (1936). A glossary for variants from Standard French in Lafourche Paris. Master’s thesis, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.Google Scholar
  10. Guilbeau, J. A. (1950). The French spoken in Lafourche Parish. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
  11. Klingler, T. A. (1992). A descriptive study of the Creole Speech of Pointe Coupée Parish, Louisiana, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
  12. Marshall, M. M. (1982). Bilingualism in Southern Louisiana: A linguistic analysis. Anthropological Linguistics, 24, 308–324.Google Scholar
  13. Marshall, M. M. (1987). A Louisiana Creole speech continuum. Regional Dimensions, 5, 71–94.Google Scholar
  14. Mougeon, R., & Beniak, É. (1989). Language contraction and linguistic change: The case of Welland French, in Nancy C. Dorian (ed.), Investigating Obsolescence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Neumann, I. (1985). Le créole de Breaux Bridge, Louisiane: Etude morphosyntaxique, textes, vocabulaire. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
  16. Oukada, L. (1977). Louisiana French: A linguistic study with a descriptive analysis of Lafourche dialect. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.Google Scholar
  17. Poirier, C. (1995). Les variantes topolectales du lexique français: Propositions de classement à partir d’exemples québécois. In M. Francard & D. Latin (Eds.), Le régionalisme lexical (pp. 13–56 ). Paris: AUPELF, John Libbey Eurotext.Google Scholar
  18. Rézeau, P. (1976). Un patois de Vendée. Le parler rural de Vouvant. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
  19. Rottet, K. (1995). Language shift and language death in the cajun French-speaking communities of Terrebonne and Lafourche Parishes, Louisiana. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
  20. Ryan, R. (1989). Economie, régularité et différenciation formelle: Cas des pronoms personnels sujets acadiens. In R. Mougeon & E. Beniak (Eds.), Le français canadien parlé hors Québec: Aperçu sociolinguistique (pp. 201–212 ). Québec: Presses de l’Université Laval.Google Scholar
  21. Valdman, A. (1965). Review of M. Conwell & A. Juilland. (1963). Louisiana French grammar 1: Phonology, morphology, syntax. Linguistics, 12, 91–100.Google Scholar
  22. Valdman, A. (1991). On the socio-historical context in the development of Louisiana and Saint-Domingue Creoles. French Language Studies, 2, 75–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Valdman, A. (1994). La sitution actuelle du créole en Louisiane. Présence francophone, 43, 85–109.Google Scholar
  24. Valdman, A. (1996). Le rôle de l’enseignement dans la survie du français en Louisiane. Plurilinguisme, 11, 153–178.Google Scholar
  25. Vissière, I., and Vissière, J.-L. (1993). Peaux-Rouges et robes noires. Paris: ELA la Différence.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Albert Valdman
    • 1
  1. 1.Creole InstituteIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations