Skip to main content

Interpreting the Dental Peculiarities of the ‘Robust’ Australopithecines

  • Chapter
Book cover Food Acquisition and Processing in Primates

Abstract

It is now widely recognised that during the early Pleistocene there were at least two distinct hominid lineages (Tobias, 1973; Leakey and Walker, 1976; White, Johanson and Kimbel, 1981; Wood, 1981). Whatever the nomenclatural devices used, there is also widespread agreement that one lineage contains, or leads to, the group we know informally as the ‘robust’ australopithecines. Most workers also accept that the specialisations which demarcate that lineage are most developed within the hypodigm of Australopithecus (Paranthropus) boisei. The first attempt to define the functional adaptations underlying the evolution of ‘robust’ australopithecines (what Tattersall and Eldredge (1977) call the evolutionary ’scenario’) was made three decades or more ago (Robinson, 1954) and since then nearly all such attempts have identified characteristic features of the teeth, jaws and cranium and stressed their likely association with particular dietary and feeding regimes (Robinson, 1963; Jolly, 1970; Du Brul, 1977; Walker, 1981). Before one can proceed to postulate hypothetical scenarios, however, it is most important to examine whether the basis for identifying the morphological sets, or phena, is a sound one. Even though the case for the distinctiveness of the ‘robust’ australopithecines is widely accepted, there is much less agreement about the taxonomic and functional implications of the features cited. In particular, there is discussion about whether the apparently distinctive morphological features are not simply the scale effects of a larger body size, rather than evidence of more profound functional modifications. In this paper I will discuss the general problem of how such assessments are made, and examine two examples which relate to dental morphology. The first is the relationship between canine and molar size and between canine/molar size and body size, and the second is the link, if any, between overall size and the relative cusp size of mandibular molar teeth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Cheverud, J.M. (1982) Relationship among ontogenetic, static and evolutionary allometry. Am. J. phys. Anthrop. 59: 139–149.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DuBrul, E.L. (1977) Early hominid feeding mechanisms. Am. J. phys. Anthrop. 47: 305–320.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gingerich, P.D., Smith, B.H. and Rosenberg, K. (1982) Allometric scaling in the dentition of primates and prediction of body weight from tooth size in fossils. Am. J. phys. Anthrop. 58: 81–100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. (1966) Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny. BioZ. Rev. 41: 587–640.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. (1975) Allometry in primates, with emphasis on scaling and_the evolution of the brain. In “Approaches to Primate Paleobiology” ( F.S. Szalay, ed.), pp. 244–292. Karger, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, P.H., Kavanagh, M. and Clutton-Brock, T.H. (1978) Sexual dimorphism in primate teeth. J. Zool. (Lond.) 186: 475–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, J.S. and Teissier, G. (1936) Zur terminologie des relativen Grössenwachstums. Biol. ZbZ. 56: 381–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, C.J. (1970) The seed eaters: a new model of hominid differentiation based on a baboon analogy. Man 5: 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, R.F. (1975) The functional adaptations of primate molar teeth. Am. J. phys. Anthrop. 43: 195–216.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leakey, R.E.F. and Walker, A.C. (1976) Australopithecus, Homo erectus and the single species hypothesis. Nature 261: 572–574.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McHenry, H.M. and Corruccini, R.S. (1980) Late tertiary hominoids and human origins. Nature 285: 397–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilbeam, D. and Gould, S.J. (1974) Size and scaling in human evolution. Science 186: 892–901.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J.T. (1954) The genera and species of the Australo- pithecinae. Am. J. phys. Anthrop. 12: 181–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J.T. (1963) Adaptive radiation in the australopithecines and the origin of man. In “African Ecology and Human

    Google Scholar 

  • Evolution“ (F.C. Howell and F. Bourliere, eds.), pp. 385–416. Aldine, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.J. (1981a) On the definition of variables in studies of primate dental allometry. Am. J. phys. Anthrop. 55: 323–329.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.J. (1981b) Interspecific scaling of maxillary canine size and shape in female primates: relationships to social structure and diet. J. Hum. Evol. 10: 165–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tattersall, I. and Eldredge, N. (1977) Fact, theory and fantasy in human paleontology. Am. Scient. 65: 204–211.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, P.V. (1973) Implications of the new age estimates of the early South African hominids. Nature 246: 79–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A. (1981) Diet and teeth. Dietary hypotheses and human evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B. 292: 57–64.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • White, T.D., Johanson, D.C. and Kimbel, W.H. (1981) Australopithecus africanus: its phyletic position reconsidered. S. Afr. J. Sci. 77: 445–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpoff, M.H. (1976) Primate models for australopithecine sexual dimorphism. Am. J. phys. Anthrop. 45: 497–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpoff, M.H. (1978) Some aspects of canine size in the australopithecine.. J. Hum. Evol. 7: 115–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpoff, M.H. (1982) Relative canine size. J. Hum. Evol. 10: 151–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, B.A. (1978) Models for assessing relative canine size in fossil hominids. J. Hum. Evol. 8: 493–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, B.A. (1979) An analysis of tooth and body size relationships in five primate taxa. Folia primatol. 31: 187–211.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, B.A. (1981) Human origins–fossil evidence and current problems of analysis and interpretation. In “Progress in Anatomy”, Vol. 1 ( R.J. Harrison and R.L. Holmes, eds.), pp. 229–245. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, B.A., Abbott, S.A. and Graham, S.H. (1983) Analysis of the dental morphology of Plio-Pleistocene hominids. II. Mandibular molars–study of cusp areas, fissure pattern and cross sectional shape of the crown. J. Anat. 137: 289–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, B.A. and Stack, C.G. (1980) Does allometry explain the differences between “gracile” and “robust” australopithecines? Am. J. phys. Anthrop. 52: 55–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wood, B. (1984). Interpreting the Dental Peculiarities of the ‘Robust’ Australopithecines. In: Chivers, D.J., Wood, B.A., Bilsborough, A. (eds) Food Acquisition and Processing in Primates. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5244-1_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5244-1_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-5246-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-5244-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics